• grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    14 days ago

    If you don’t know any better, ie haven’t lived long enough, then it sounds like a logical and compelling ideology

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      14 days ago

      yeah, until they pull out their machine god they absolutely have to build, because otherwise trillions of simulated humans will be tortured forever and that’s not mathing in their sum of all happiness. also it never occurred to them that maybe billionaires shouldn’t exist and instead post things like this:

      totally not a cult btw

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        I’m with you, but someone who kills the CEO of a health insurance company does not strike me as someone who dismisses real/immediate suffering out of hand.

      • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        14 days ago

        Ironically the trolley problem meme here is a great example of the objection: the same set up that puts him in the position to pull the lever also requires that people be tied to the track.

        • Soyweiser@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          Also they could pull a lot more levers, but those other levers are not pulled. See how musk paid 6.5 times fixing world hunger for twitter.

      • V0ldek@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 days ago

        Realistic version: pulling the lever would save five lives but that decision would cost shareholders $7.23. What should you do?

        10/10 CEOs fail this test!

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      14 days ago

      No, if you’re from the same socioeconomic sphere as him and haven’t lived long enough. The only people I’ve ever met or heard of that are effective altruists are “upper middle class” or properly wealthy…and younger than 50…

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        14 days ago

        I guess because I was an idiot cringe atheist rationalist realist (you know the type) when I was his age, and thanks to an open mind and some very patient very wise people in my life, I was able to grow out of it, I give people like that the benefit of the doubt as long as they’re otherwise kind and open-minded.

        • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          14 days ago

          My issue isn’t with the basic ideals of effective altruisim, it’s with how it’s used by the wealthy to fleece people with the idea of helping people.
          There’s not a single thing wrong with being a starry-eyed idealist. Especially if you act, bring your beliefs and ideals into fact.