Hopefully PG learned this skill in the last 20 or so years.
LOL.
LMAO.
I hope this was sarcastic.
Hopefully PG learned this skill in the last 20 or so years.
LOL.
LMAO.
I hope this was sarcastic.
And in either case, the aura of being a tech company instead of a company is lost
I don’t understand this and am kinda afraid of what hides behind this
one might be tempted to assume it’s something that’s readily replicable by the competition (and they need to prevent that as long as they can) instead of any sort of notably important breakthrough.
ah yes, open AI
The only invidious instance that works this week is nadeko:
We had different childhoods
Passenger! I wanted to drive people to their cool vacations and whatnot. Also passenger trains go vroooom and freights are like super slow and lame, and carry coal or some other boring stuff.
developers are scrutinising AI-written code less than they would scrutinise their own code
Wait, is this how Those People claim that Copilot actually “improved their productivity”? They just don’t fucking read what the machine output?
I was always like “how can Copilot make me code faster if all it does is give me bad code to review which takes more than just writing it” and the answer is “what do you mean review”???
I wanted to be a train.
This year, to put their coins on the map (…) a pair of creators rubbed up against one another in their underwear
Okay, those two clearly just wanted to do that but were so deep in the closet it had to be a “crypto marketing scheme”.
I also had some extremely cringeworthy and not-even-wrong opinions 23 years ago, but at least I was 3yo then.
The terms, concerningly, don’t give a firm data retention time frame, and say that LineLeap may be “unable to fully delete or de-identify” user data due to “technical” or “other operational reasons.”
My villain arc is going to be turning into Thanos and collecting them stones just to enforce GDPR forever into cosmic law with a snap of my fingers.
Kay mate, rational thought 101:
When the setup is “we run each query multiple times” the default position is that it costs more resources. If you claim they use roughly the same amount you need to substantiate that claim.
Like, that sounds like a pretty impressive CS paper, “we figured out how to run inference N times but pay roughly the cost of one” is a hell of an abstract.
Literally the same shit as during the war against work from home.
Hey look, they are more productive, get their work done faster, don’t have to spend 10% of their life commuting, and have more freedom. OUTRAGEOUS!
(Only this time there’s no actual productivity boost, but they’re still preemptively mad?)
Posteo is from Germany
That’s significantly less comforting than Proton’s Switzerland. It’s in 14 Eyes after all.
I immediatelly knew who and what you were talking about without even clicking.
May the fact that he also lives inside my head rent-free be some solace to you.
Appreciate, but flamethrowers on jets still sounds somehow less idiotic than tracking CO2 emissions with BLOCKCHAIN
I was reading David and Amy’s stuff on energy costs of AI and ended up skimming the MSFT “environment sustainability report” and… god
Like I don’t even know how to satirise this. Help me sneer pros, for I am too depressed to make fun of this.
Probably, but I would probably also never have heard the phrase “generative AI”, so win?
ye that’s how most normal people use the internet? what’s the alternative strategy, checking it out if it doesn’t interest you?