• MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m shocked! Shocked I say!

    … Well, not that shocked.

    I mean, really, who didn’t see this one? It was pretty blatant. The fact that we have confirmed reports of it is nice, but c’mon.

  • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    You mean to tell me that going from the street to trial in less than a month, from what would normally be a single murder charge isn’t the normal way of things??

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      He’s only made his plea. Yes, that part happens quickly.

      EDIT: Look at the upvotes on the parent comment. Y’all are really dumb enough to think this man is going to trial right now.

      It’s misinformation, it’s ignorance, it may even be a lie. Downvote this crap.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    165
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    the top three DOJ officials under Attorney General Merrick Garland have all represented massive healthcare companies during their respective stints in private practice before joining the DOJ.

    Because of COURSE they did! 🤦🤬

    • Logi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      People keep conflating health care providers with the insurance companies which are in the health care denial business. These are not at all the same.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Lisa Monaco, the Deputy U.S. Attorney General previously worked as a partner at the law firm O’Melveny & Myers LLP. At O’Melveny & Myers, Monaco represented Humana–the fifth largest U.S. health insurance company–according to her financial disclosures. Notably, O’Melveny & Myers also successfully defended United Health in a suit brought by United health group insured patients earlier this year.

        Health “insurance” company, not provider.

        The number three at DOJ, Acting Associate AG Benjamin Mizer, also represented healthcare and pharmaceutical giant Sanofi-Aventis, among others firms.

        While not an insurance company, Sanofi-Aventis (now Sanofi) was provably corrupt and predatory on multiple occasions in multiple countries and was/is VERY much part of the same problem as United Health and the rest of the health insurance leech industry.

        Finally, #4 at DOJ, Solicitor General Elizabeth Prolegar, reported Lumos Pharma, Syneos Health, and Amgen, as former clients on her disclosure.

        Syneos have been sued for firing people who take family leave that they’re legally entitled to and Amgen pleaded guilty to guilty to improper marketing that put patients at risk

        In conclusion: while you’re technically right that only one of them worked for INSURANCE companies, they all worked for health sector companies that were and are part of the problem, so it’s a distinction without importance in this case.

        • Logi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’m not saying there isn’t a problem here. But we need to be a bit more precise in the language.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The club you are in it’s bigger though, they don’t want you to find out about it.

        • zephorah@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          41
          ·
          1 day ago

          The awareness is lovely to see.

          Interestingly enough I don’t think we’d have arrived here without COVID. It broke the routine, slowed the inertia, pushed self reflection.

          And it made the house of cards that is the healthcare system visible to all.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            29
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I agree completely.

            It also disproved the “once the crisis is big enough, everyone will hold hands and work together for the common good” myth that pro-establishment people used to trot out to mollify critics of the status quo.

            The people radicalized by a combination of the inequities of the status quo and the gaslighting of opportunistic far right politicians (who are of course themselves very much part of the establishment) didn’t suddenly set their collective delusions of self-sufficiency and their scapegoating of vulnerable people aside to help themselves and other people get through the pandemic as safely as possible. They only got WORSE.

            • orcrist@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              1 day ago

              On a local level, we really do see humans band together to overcome crises. But not everyone, not all the time. And on a national level, stopping the rich motherfuckers is a struggle that goes back millenia.

              Some people think that “progress will happen” as if it’s inevitable that society improves over time. But a quick glance at history proves otherwise.

              • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 day ago

                A quick glance at history also shows which methods are the most effective. Which is why we have had decades of conditioning to push us in the other direction, for strategies that are loud and easily ignored.

          • sudo42@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            This also helps explain the Texas Lt. Governor’s (?) plea to, “Let all the old people die. We need to get the economy moving again.” Health Care Insurance Inc. doesn’t want to pay money to treat people if we can convince everyone its cheaper to let them die.

    • anachronist@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nah he’s not a white collar criminal who destroyed the lives of millions.

      Biden might be willing to posthumously pardon Brian Thompson for his insider trading crimes though.

    • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Can he? Honest question. Can he pardon someone who hasnt actually been convicted of anything?

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          accepting the pardon is an admission of guilt

          Logically and in the eyes of public opinion? Most likely. Legally, though? Nope

          You’re right about there being consequences, though: you can’t invoke your 5th amendment right against self-incrimination for a crime that you’ve been pardoned for.

          So technically being pardoned for the federal terrorism charge COULD make it more difficult for him to defend against the other charges, but I’m pretty sure that not even a NYC prosecutor can argue that the murder charge is independent of it…

          Moot point, though, since Joe Biden is as likely to pardon Luigi as he is to drop trou and smoke a joint with his ass during a WH press briefing.