• lemmylump@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    There’s show be protesters at the studio, this fascist psycho shouldn’t have a moments peace.

    Every homeless person in the city should setting up and living at Fox news headquarters.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    8 days ago

    Someone should make a bot that responds to all of his socials with that clip for eternity.

    • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 days ago

      We’ve never been the target audience, so boycotting this dumpster doesn’t really cancel anything. Their audience is fine with his rethoric.

      • Anakin-Marc Zaeger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        As much as I like Michelle Obama, her idea of “when they go low, we go high” is really slitting is in the wrist right now. It really doesn’t work when the low side’s bar is non-existent. Personally, I’ve always been a fan of “when they go low, we curb stomp them out of existence”.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    But Kirk or that United Health CEO or a politician or a business leader are all off the table. Calling for the killing of masses of undesirables is fine but don’t dare suggest that for the people who decide to actually kill those masses.

  • Corelli_III@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    8 days ago

    he’s still on the air because he’s a fascist on a fascist, pro-state news channel

    the country is run by fascists

    “despite”

    the USA is a fascist empire this is normal in a fascist empire because this (a pogrom against the unhoused) is already occurring

    for fucks sake outrage is very 2000-late, you’re the fucking VOLK

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    8 days ago

    DespiteBecause of his public call to “just kill” unhoused people, Brian Kilmeade continues to host “Fox & Friends.”

  • MisterCurtis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 days ago

    I think we should really put numbers to this and highlight the severity of his statement. According to numbers reported in The 2024 Annual Homelessness Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress, he casually suggested killing around 771,480 people. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/pdf/2024-AHAR-Part-1.pdf

    That’s close to the population of Seattle. https://www.seattle.gov/opcd/population-and-demographics

    Near the death toll of the American Civil War. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 days ago

    Anyone on the left would have lost their job in a heartbeat.

    It’s time to stop holding those on the left to an entirely different, higher standard. It isn’t working and it only gives the fascists more power. This country is absolutely pathetic right now. Time to start putting some feet down and holding the line.

        • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          7 days ago

          They are not pro genocide. They just understand nuance. You can be pro-Israel and anti-genocide. It requires mental capacity to also understand we can’t just abandon our ally because they have a shitty leader(s).

          Should our allies abandon us because we elected Trump?

          Purity tests are dangerous.

          Do you really think Harris would be this hands off on Israel had she been elected?

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            You can be pro-Israel and anti-genocide.

            That requires a series of mental controtrions that no sane person is capable of.

          • philosloppy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 days ago

            Purity tests are dangerous.

            Gotta love how it’s only a purity test when it’s progressives asking for concessions from the center. When the center doesn’t want to compromise it’s never obstinacy, it’s merely “pragmatism” but the left is expected to concede nearly everything. Phooey!

              • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 days ago

                We do know, because they had a year to stop it and instead they illegally gave Israel every bomb and bullet they wanted, even diverting weapon shipments from our other (slightly less) fascist puppet during a literal invasion, even going around congress to keep the weapons flowing, using diplomatic pressure and literally bombing other countries who tried to stop it.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            You can be pro-Israel and anti-genocide.

            That’s like saying you can be pro-nazi-germany and anti-nazi. There is no nuance in sending billions of dollars in weapons to a country actively committing genocide. That can only be taken to mean support for genocide.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 days ago

    But if you make a mean comment about an open white nationalist Nazi who got 360 quickedscoped they want to dox your job. You can’t make this reality up.

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 days ago

    It used to be that advertiser boycotts sometimes worked. They even worked on Fox News in the past. In 2009 all it took for a boycott against Glenn Beck was for him to say that Obama was racist. That resulted in a huge advertiser boycott, which then resulted in them cancelling his show. In 2017 advertisers pulled out of Bill O’Reilly’s show, but it wasn’t his hateful views that resulted in the boycott, it was the sexual misconduct allegations. Tucker Carlson’s show was cancelled eventually too, there were some advertiser boycotts, but it really seemed like what hurt Fox was that they lost a defamation case that he caused and it cost them nearly $1 billion.

    OTOH, often boycotts don’t work. The boycott against Laura Ingraham didn’t seem to work. Her show is still on the air. She was forced to apologize though. Jeanine Pirro was lightly punished with her attacks on Ilhan Omar, but her show was never cancelled. It stayed on the air until she became (and it’s hard to believe this is real) the US Attorney for DC.

    It seems like sometimes a loss of money works. But, it seems to work better if it’s a defamation suit vs. an advertiser boycott. Still, an ad boycott might help.

    Here are some lists of who advertises on Fox News:

    https://whoadvertiseson.org/foxnews/

    https://www.trueusa.org/boycott

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      Fox News is able to survive advertisement boycotts more easily than other outlets because they charge a higher rate to cable providers to carry their channel. They know their viewership will sign up with the company that has their channel and not the competitor that doesn’t. So all providers need to have it because their audience is huge. So they collect a larger percentage of their revenue from these companies than other channels do.and because of that, they don’t need as much money from advertisers and can more easily absorb an advertiser boycott.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        They also know that a lot of really old people have no idea what’s on their cable bill and just pay when it arrives, even if they never watch Fox News.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    You fire Dowd because he made a very non-offensive offhand remark, which kind of turned out to be true, sure seems like he was a fan at one point, prior to making well reasoned point that a person who make a living fomenting political violence as a solution would unintentionally be on the receiving end of political violence from someone that shared his sentiment.

    But hey, literally advocating for people to be killed due to being homeless and in need of mental health care, is perfectly fine.

    SMH. Honestly the “Left” is absolutely pathetic in not pushing back and playing the damn game of Calvinball when the stakes are this freaking high.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s not the left, those are liberal news organizations who absolutely prefer fascism to any economic system that would threaten the privilege of their owners. I will direct you to the wild disconnect between the average person, who identifies with not being able to receive healthcare, and the average pundit or oped writer who identifies with the CEO who profits off human suffering.