And it should. What AC proposed is seen as shit by most Flight Attendants I know.

Edit : Also the national union crying victory after the first strike was an asshole move, they should have closed their mouth and wait this vote. Now they have everything to lose from worker that want to go back on strike.

I like the fighting mechanics of Honor+Intrigue

In a gist, you have Health Point and Stances, you can « dodge » an attack by decreasing your Stance (which give you penalties) or accept the blow. When you’re out of Stances or HP you have lost

By law they’re obligated to pay for arrangements, but since they didn’t make plans and hoped that the 107 force their workforce to work for free, they, now, try to paint themselves as the good guys. Don’t believe this shit, AirCanada is obligated to do this

Look like an asshole (no gender here) that tried to used law for it’s advantage

Because Tim Hortons is the Burger King of Canada, after all they merge …

At the Beginning Tim Horton (the hockey player) started a pretty decent Dunkin Donuts like restaurant but at some point his actioneers oust him and he died without money for what he build. Now Tim Horton’s at this time was still something okay I guess, in Montreal language watchdogs asked Tim Horton’s to comply with French Language Law which they refuse and transforme the Tim Horton’s to Tim Hortons (because now it’s a name I guess).

Like you can see they always were shitty corporate citizen

Somewhere in the 2010s McDonald Canada tried to stole their market parts with better coffee and donuts. They partially succeeded because Tim Hortons at the time did great pub to bolster patriotic sentiment (they appears in How I met Your Mother after all). Since then they never really tried to be better and after that they merged with Burger King

Exactly. Didn’t want to look like they publish a tonne of puff piece about the poor travellers that didn’t get their flight

Now CBC is painting it like it … but they didn’t do it last week when the flight attendant were bullied by the work minister Patty Hadju. They didn’t point it as an act of defiance when Postal Worker and Rail Worker bring the gouv to court for the same thing.

Defund the SPVM

Pis ça presse

seven hours

So AC already had an option, they choose to force the strike

Yeah … they worked unpaid too. Not at the same rate but statistics show that women’s work relies heavily on some form of unpaid labor

Here’s a better article with way more information but you’ll have to work your better French

This should be enough to call for his resignation and Patty Hadju’s.

Just talked with one of my friend journalist in Quebec City. Turns out that on the 50 recommendations that Google made, only 13 were usable for a grand total of 8 streets corner lights (for nearly 900 lights in Qc city). This is a fucking puff piece by CBC/RC for Google

Quebec City is the first municipality in the country to partner with the web giant’s Green Light project, which the company offers free of charge to cities.

When something is free it’s because you’re the product

Finally a « media » that say what we already know :

Every single one of these [27] workers, expressed a common belief that Air Canada had been in contact with the CIRB before the strike was declared, and that the government was prepared to intervene prior to the strike commencing. The union itself has not endorsed this view, noting it remains unverified. […]

Michael Rousseau, the CEO of Air Canada seemed to be completely blindsided. “We thought, obviously, Section 107 would be enforced, and that they wouldn’t illegally avoid (it),” he said in an interview with Bloomberg. In the interview, he admitted that he had made no provisions for the passengers who are currently stranded. […]

Canadian law provides that any individuals who are stranded in the event of a strike are owed a fully paid flight back on another airline, regardless of whether they have an inter-airline agreement or not. It is encouraged by experts to refuse any offer of a refund, since other airlines have exponentially increased their prices to take advantage of consumers who don’t know their legal rights. […]

I’m pretty sure that’s the proper procedure. They will charge him, the procurer will choose to follow up or not IF the crown choose to prosecute he will plead self defence (likely win) and will have to prove that he had properly store his firearm.

I’m not a lawyer so maybe I’m in the wrong but I’m pretty sure that’s how it works

But then I had an Alexander

Tacky Cardassian fascist eyesore!

« They » will tried to prove that Union Leader said that workers shouldn’t go back to work and defy the order, which they did not. Anyway that’s not the goal here, they will force the Union to go to court which will cost money to the union and the taxpayers for a judge to say what we already know : the Liberal gov overstep. Now the gov will probably not be obligated to pay the Union legal council which make them poorer.

This shit will take months maybe years