Before AI Doomer Coxon’s ‘hilbertspaess’ account was made this year, an account by that name had previously been created and deleted at least two times prior. And, according to the Internet Archive, the first display name on that account was ‘Jacob Coxon’. So it’s reasonable to say that it was his account then too, and thus its posts are his unfiltered intellect.

Someone on Twitter by the name Dugan Nash put together a dedicated archive of hilbertspaess’s old tweets from the internet archive, hosted at https://hilbertspaess.pages.dev/

The things a rationalist doomer bro was posting on twitter in 2022 might surprise you! If you somehow weren’t expecting to see anything about IQ, the Holocaust, AI, or NFTs.

Via Futurism, via Reddit SneerClub

  • lurker@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Gotta say, the climate change denier/AI doomer combo never ceases to baffle me. Though the climate change denial is actually the most pedestrian thing here. what the fuck do you mean ‘the entire discipline of ‘geography’ is made-up’

    • Architeuthis@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      EAs need to downplay climate change because otherwise it becomes really hard to explain why preventing it isn’t the main focus of the organisation, since it should break their utilitarian calculus just as much as imaginary future robots with a hard on for paperclips do, with the additional problem that it would make their relationship with capital providers far more adversarial.

      Plus they probably think that if they oppose industrial build out even indirectly it will piss off the basilisk.

      • diz@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I would argue that the root cause is that they are complete morons who wouldn’t recognize paperclip maximization if it put a gas turbine in their backyard.

    • lurker@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Many other catastrophic panics in the past have been just fearmongering,” he added.

      Heyyy, he’s self aware!

      “I agree with president Trump’s tweet that global warming doomsday scenarios were overplayed,” he told Fox’s Sean Hannity. “It’s a very slow process. We’re talking about doomsdays — completely absurd.”

      ”The reason this is unique is AI is moving so incredibly quickly, we won’t have time to respond to it before it’s too late.”

      The speed of the event doesn’t disqualify its seriousness? Climate change is still a very big deal even if it’s moving slower than the awakening of the Robot God. Also, AI developing “incredibly quickly” is still mostly bullshit because we STILL haven’t gotten anything the big tech companies promised

      • diz@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Not to mention that if we didn’t give up on global warming, that would have slowed down AI development, giving more time to prevent AI doomsday.

        Plus on the would be dooms day the AI would have less computing power available to it, meaning it would take it longer to figure out how to build another datacenter overnight. Plus if it is more distributed there’s greater latency.

        The thing about Yudkowsky’s cult is that like any religion it is really all about not actually thinking anything through.

        Everyone accuses them of not really believing what they say, because they can’t think straight about anything that they “believe”. To such an extreme extent it comes off as some sort of cynical ploy with a hidden agenda to convert the oxygen in the atmosphere into paperclips.

        • lurker@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Not to mention that if we didn’t give up on global warming, that would have slowed down AI development, giving more time to prevent AI doomsday.

          Well we haven’t given up on global warming since we still devote trillions of dollars into climate change solutions plus the rapidly growing clean energy transition that’s overtaken gas in power generation. But I understand the main point-which is that AI and climate change are linked problems, so ignoring climate change to focus on AI is kinda impossible since data centres are a big warming contributor

        • diz@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Also i used to point out that the real “foom” is how we are fucking up the planet after billions years of evolution. Practically in an instant. Like yeah it feels slow to us because we run pretty fast.

          But on geological timeframe it really could just as well be their stupid AI dismantling the planet in 6 days (and on the seventh day, resting).