• Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is the future that those who are controlling the conservative platform are trying to prevent.

    Male no mistake this is and always will be a class war about stealing the value of workers for their own personal gain.

  • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m seriously shocked the Fox media team didn’t bother photoshopping horns on his head, distorting his pleasant, lovely smile into a menacing grimace, or altering his skin color into the brimstone-red spectrum.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Or, to be even more crude, him as a caricature of Mohamad.

      (Please don’t ban me mods, we live in a world where this could actually happen on national TV).

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Its crazy that NYC still can’t afford free public transportation. City literally has more expensive apartments than yearly cost of operating busses.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The point is you need pretext to remove people who use the system as a living room instead of transit.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Sure but why would a fee do that? If anything that would encourage this behavior because if I pay 2$ I feel entitled to spend there as much time as I want.

        This is pretty well established theory now in behavior economy:

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivation_crowding_theory

        We already invented the most effective and humane fix for this - social workers. I don’t think anything can work better then another person trained in handling social situations correcting the issue themselves.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Free buses aren’t something you really need to “afford” because even in smaller cities the economic value returned through that way of operating is given back and then some. Like, they’ve been throwing free money on the ground for decades upon decades and it’s about time shit catches up to reality.

      • Xenny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Bus fares make up only like 2% of the income for my cities public transit system. They can afford to go free.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Right but I think you’ve missed my entire point somehow. Literally it is cheaper to not charge anything for transit. You don’t need to afford it, you just have to do it. It is free money, understand?

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Americans will just go “this guy wants to instate free healthcare, cleanse police corruption, and to stop bombing the middle east!” and expect you to reel back in disgust.

    • Wilco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because their MAGAt base will in fact reel back in disgust if any of those things are proposed. If “the libs” want it, then MAGA is programmed to hate it.

      See how the fox piece looks? It has the politicians face, then they let MAGA know the guy is a “lib”, likely with the set up talking points. That is all MAGAts need, a face and to know the person is on the other side … from there anything else mentioned about the person is automatically bad.

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    This might be a humor magazine, but I’ll be honest on my perspective out here in NJ.

    That $30 minimum wage thing scares the living daylights out of me, especially with the congestion pricing still in effect. Raising the minimum wage in the City that far will make the already ridiculous costs in NYC skyrocket. It’s going to make it functionally impossible for average people who work outside NYC to regularly go in and do things. You know that business owners aren’t going to eat the loss of profits, the prices will just go up to match. Rents will go up, costs will go up. I do respect the idea of trying to get to a living wage. I’d love to see a viable plan, but the best way to do it is to keep all costs down, not massively increase labor costs.

    I think the bus idea is a better use of tax money than 90% of what NYC has right now, as long as the funds are focused on maintaining vehicles and paying drivers who perform well, rather than lining some suit’s bank account. I don’t know if that’s going to be possible, but hey, the worst that happens is they try it, it fails, and the buses go back to being fare-based.

    It’s that wage idea that’s going to really, really suck.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      He’s not going to get $30 minimum wage. He’s starting high so he can negotiate to a middle ground. He’s not going to be King of NYC. He’s doesn’t just get what he wants that easily.

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fair enough. He beat the party establishment. If he wins the general, he’ll still have to deal with the City establishment. Still, increases in NYC’s minimum wage do typically end up hurting those of us stuck in the orbit. So like I said, I’m scared. All I can do is brace for the impact, and hope that the increase in costs don’t give NJ business owners ideas about how much more profit they can gouge because of the NYC cost for goods and/or services. Note that I don’t actually have high hopes on that. If there’s a chance they can make more profit, most places won’t risk leaving money on the table. They’ll raise the prices, and then lower them partway later on so they’re still increased but it feels like a discount.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Here’s how I think they see this:

    Landlords will go out of business. For-profit grocery stores will go out of business. People I don’t know won’t suffer (there’s even more letters at the end and I don’t know what they mean; that scares me). Businesses will have to pay more to operate, therefore prices will rise for me to protect profits. Brown people will still be where I have to see and interact with them.

    Conservatives are fearful. They think when someone gets something good, it’s by taking from them. Fuck 'em.

    • tfm@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Brown people will still be where I have to see and interact with them.

      They don’t even try to hide their racism anymore.

  • Sumocat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Access to food, transportation, housing, it’s almost like he thinks the job of government is providing decent infrastructure.

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    People act like $30/hr is high. Note this would be the mayor of NYC, so it would be raised for NYC only if he got his way. The cheapest place you can get to live on your own there I am finding is 2600 a month. So say you made 30/hr. That’s $62,400 working 40 hours a week. Take out Federal/state/city taxes ends up being around $46,112 take home. The place costed $31,200. Making the lowest rent findable in Manhattan 2/3 of $30/hr.

    They wouldn’t be able to get approved to even live there if they tried. They would have to rent a room from someone else with a 4 bedroom place renting to 4 people for around $1200/ month. And share bathrooms/kitchen/living space with people. And they would still struggle to get by if they paid for health insurance, travel costs to and from work, food, and the whole living crap.

    $30 isn’t radical for NYC, it’s like base needed salary… And hope you have a good stable relationship with someone else making the same, then maybe you can get your own place together, just don’t do something stupid like get pregnant because you can’t afford to not go to work, and can’t afford to put them in daycare so you would both have to uproot and move real quick finding jobs elsewhere.

    • crumbguzzler5000@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wait, we are gonna vote for a guy who is going to make renting a room more affordable?! COMMUNISM!! I WONT STAND FOR SUCH LUXURY LIVING CONDITIONS! /s

    • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It says $30 by 2030. What is the term for Mayor? Is he promising something that literally cannot be done by him?

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Minimum wage is current around $16 there. Standardly you put a plan in place with a set date and partial increases up to that day to allow companies time to plan and get ready. For instance the last time federal minimum wage increased, it rolled out as such

        "The 2007 amendments increased the minimum wage to $5.85 per hour effective July 24, 2007; $6.55 per hour effective July 24, 2008; and $7.25 per hour effective July 24, 2009. "

        7.25 was what they said they were going to go to, but rolled it out slowly to prepare everyone.

        16-30 in a 4 year roll out makes sense

        • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wow, insane that it’s that low right now. Minimum wage in Seattle is $20.76 and grows based on inflation every year. It’s grown from $15 in 2017.

  • shplane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes but many of these would require taxing the rich, which I’m against because I might somehow become rich one day through virtually no effort or understanding of how one becomes rich to begin with

    /s

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s it right there. Just mentioning the phrase tax the rich has become enough of a catalyst for the punching down to intensify. Keep the pressure on.

  • BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Jesus would NEVER Approve of ANY of these! AFFORDABLE housing? Jesus would BURN it to The Ground! PROTECTING your Neighbor? LAUGHABLE! This is the MOST Anti Jesus Platform EVER! Where’s the ELIMINATING Healthcare? Where’s the ELIMINATING Homes? Where’s the HURTING your Neighbors? Where’s the JESUS!