From the same intellectual honesty that “Democratic People’s Republic of Korea” comes from.

“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words.”

— Jean-Paul Sartre

However it’s all their fault if Harris loses.

Maybe he just needs to work harder on it.

Unless they gain more support from endorsing RCV than they would lose to third parties. They’re slowly bending to long term third party pressure.

2. It would be cool if there was an opt-in libre database to which we could submit pseudonymous traffic data. It would be hard to prevent sybil attacks though.

Yes, but how exactly that distorts the market is counterintuitive.

What follows is incorrect

It’s a price floor, which creates a deadweight loss.

Since we’re also consumers, it’s a net loss.

Remember that a definition is not an endorsement of a word’s use.

— https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless

I got paid minimum wage when I was a supermarket cashier.

I’ve always used it as an example of when oversimplified chalkboard economics don’t match experimental reality.

Literally everyone who uses that word sucks

Confirmed my guess

No I value their opinion

Your client can ban specific users for you only, and you can block individual communities if you don’t like their moderation.

But I’m guessing they embarrassed you a year ago and you actually want them banned from the internet.

And it’s copyLEFT

Most animals are already living their best lives. We’re just the freaks who don’t like to do what we actually do.

Ok then same question but without “of the political compass”

Can’t they ship from St. Petersburg?

Even if he’s legal, I saw him eating cats.

Every normal person is on several lists now regardless of guilt. We just consider that a reasonable search and treat Snowden like a traitor.