• jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    You spent days coming up with that reply?

    And you take offense at “If you want to do X, maybe look for a system that does it out of the box”? You’re ignoring the “add a house rule” option, too. Did someone hurt you by telling you to play another system, and this is trauma shutting down your brain?

    You’re a mess.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You ignored the house rule option by being a baby about “ad-hoc rules”. And I’m the mess lol

      • jtrek@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yes. You are a mess. An embarrassment, even. The only one being a baby here is you.

        Furthermore, a house rule is not the same as an ad-hoc on-the-spot ruling that may or may not be repeated later.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          All I said was that the DM should understand how setting expectations works, chief. And yea, to account for a change in expectations they may need to do something mildly creative. That’s not a rule and it doesn’t need to be anything special.

          Big yikes.

          • jtrek@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            You also said to go fuck yourself over the idea that if you want rules for something, you could play a system that does that out of the box. You also called people massive pieces of garbage. So “all I said” is some bullshit.

            You’re so mad over some imaginary scenario and that other tables play differently.