• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What is the use case for 127000 PPI?
    AFAIK retina start about 450 for phones, that are already pretty close view.
    The closest id probably VR that can utilize 1000+. (AFAIK 2000 is REALLY good!)
    But that leaves more than a factor 60 that I can’t see much of a use case for?
    VR can maybe use 5000, I seriously doubt it will make any difference above that.

    So where is more than 5000 necessary?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’m thinking lithography. The higher the DPI the smaller you can make your components.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Maybe for low end lithography, you can’t use normal light for anything high end, already at 7nm it requires EXTREME ultra violet. And the lamps for that cost 100s of millions, to make the shortwave light necessary.

        But for low end, it could possibly be used for ultra fast and cheap cycle between tape-out and production?

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Non-human use cases, would be one. Like, having the ability for machines to “see” highly detailed imagery via camera. Just spitballing. My eyes are shit, so a screen that cool will never be of use.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Maybe, but it would be more logical to simply bypass screen to eye camera, to just transmit the signal from the original camera directly.
        But hypothetically yes, that could possible be a use in a future scenario.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        That’s it! An ultra fine web of microscopic lights simulating the Christmas tree shrouded in fog.
        They have to hurry up and make that, I want to see what that looks like.

        What a cool idea. 👍

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        Very creative, maybe some day. But I think it will require serious developments in other areas too. Like technologies we don’t even have yet.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          we already have tiny flexible screens and the means to beam video data to it wirelessly. we also have microscopic chip litography to handle it.

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              the obvious solution to this problem is running a convenient wire from your eyeball 🤪

              • SeekPie@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                How would you power them without a battery? It doesn’t matter if it’s really power efficient if it isn’t getting any power.

                • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  you can beam tiny amounts of it ota. it just needs to be very power efficient.

                • umbrella@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  im not saying it wouldnt be a challenge, but isnt solar panel tech possible here?

                  it just has to be really power efficient.

                • monarch@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  Wirelessly. Like an NFC tag.

                  Not saying it would be super practical but if you custom shaped them you could put a wire coil around all of the non seeing parts of the eye.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        You can’t make lenses to focus properly at shorter distances I think, or you would get an extremely narrow FOV.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        I think 8K can be made with 2k ppi.
        That would be 4 inches or about 10cm wide screen.

        • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          The bigscreen beyond used 1 inch displays so this could be useful for getting much higher resolutions in a smaller form factor. I don’t think my Index displays are even as big as 4 inches so I guess that explains why all the super high res headsets are so huge.

          Edit: my index screens are under 3", just did a lens swap so I have the old eye tubes handy

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            There are many considerations like FOV would be better with a bigger screen, I think 4" would probably be the max, but still that’s only at 2k ppi, there’¨s a looong way to 127K. Even with a 4k ppi screen you can do 8k view with just 2".