Compare 232+ Tabletop RPG Systems — TTRPG Wiki
ttrpgwiki.com
Compare 232+ tabletop RPG systems side by side: filter by genre, complexity, cost, and play style. From D&D and Pathfinder to Call of Cthulhu and indie games.
  • Scallops@ttrpg.network
    2·
    5 days ago

    I hate the name, though. Nothing about that site is a Wiki. Call it TTRPG Catalog, Folio, whatever. If there’s no way to directly edit anything, it’s not a wiki. (And no, I don’t think a wiki would be a good idea for a website of this kind.)

  • iamthetot@piefed.caEnglish
    3·
    5 months ago

    See Pathfinder 2e is “high” complexity, check Lancer, “high” complexity… Bruh what is very high then?

  • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
    2·
    5 months ago

    Do you know what is meant by accessibility? I would have thought it is just an inverse score for complexity (high complexity -> low accessibility and vice versa)

    • copacetic@discuss.tchncs.deOPEnglish
      2·
      5 months ago

      The site has this description:

      Complexity — How many rules and subsystems players need to learn

      Accessibility — How easy it is to find rules, starter sets, and learning resources

      Community — Size and activity of the player community and third-party content

      • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
        2·
        5 months ago

        Thanks, I couldn’t find it… But I do not understand their rating of Savage worlds. You can play it with really basic rules and it still works fine. Its one of the core strengths of that system 😅

    • roflo1@ttrpg.network
      1·
      5 months ago

      Huh. Didn’t pay much attention myself, but perhaps they meant to convey “availability” instead?