The first Jurassic Park movie is all time one of the greatest films ever made with the special effects still holding up to this day. The 2nd film was still very enjoyable in my opinion but it was just a cookie cutter sequel not bad, not good. The 3rd film wasn’t great at all. But compared to the rest of the series the 3rd film is basically the godfather.

As another personal pick the 1st blade movie is a hood classic good. The other 2 not so much.

    • Karjalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      I feel like the matrix 2 is similar to jurassic park 2. Very clearly inferior, but enjoyable enough to not be a complete waste of time.

      I’m saying that, I’ll say that JP 2 is better than matrix 2. I’ll happily watch JP 2 again, probably with my kids at some point, but if not then on my own… But I would be happy whether I see matrix 2 again or not.

  • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    4 days ago

    The Matrix.

    Not sure how that isn’t mentioned yet!

    First movie was a masterpiece that became a classic, the rest were completely unnecessary.

    When my brother showed The Matrix to his kid, she asked “Is there another one?” and he said “No.”

    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I can respect the fourth one. Sure, it was a terrible movie but it feels like a deliberate piss take on the idea of reviving the franchise. And I can respect that.

      • yyprum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m glad I’m not the only one thinking that. It was so bad, so so bad… But yeah I couldn’t help but feel the wachowski sister that did it (if I’m not wrong the other one didn’t participate) just dit it to spite the studio for trying to make a moneygrab movie.

        Having said that, despite the 2nd and 3rd movies not being great by any means compared to the first one, I do still enjoy them, like a guilty pleasure kinda thing.

        • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          IIRC in the first half hour they explicitly shit talk the execs wanting a sequel so it’s quite obvious it’s a middle finger to Warner bros.

        • WhoIsTheDrizzle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          The 2nd and 3rd ones are still fun, action-packed movies with ground-breaking effects. The Matrix set an impossibly high bar and it was not originally planned to be a sequel, let alone a trilogy. They also whipped them together much faster, so in that context, I think they did a great job.

        • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Huh. Douglas Adams did something similar when his publisher kept pressuring him to make another Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy book.
          “STOP MAKING ME WRITE THESE”

        • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I said I can respect it, not that it’s good. It feels like a deliberate attempt to torpedo the revival of a series that really didn’t need to be revived. That’s what I can respect, not the movie on its own merits.

    • DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I saw the original Matrix like once and never watched the sequels, so I sat down and watched them all recently. The hate for the sequels is way overblown. Apart from the bad CGI in the second, I thought they were great sequels that took the story in interesting directions.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        The problem I have with the Matrix sequels…1. they’re too far up their own ass. The original was a little up its own ass but it was up the part of its own ass that mattered for the story it was telling. Reloaded and Revelations are up their whole ass. “Love is a word.” 🙄 2. The original is a very straightforward hero’s journey in which deciding to answer the call is the ultimate key to the hero’s power. The sequels are about fate and inevitability and how basically no decision can ever matter. So we’re sorry to have bothered you.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think some of the fights just started feeling extra stupid. In particular I’m thinking of the multiple smiths in the park and the final one with him in the rain.

        • DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, the multiple smith fight is the most egregious. Trim that down and take out the most offensive CGI and I feel like Reloaded would have been vastly improved.

          • Zahille7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            As much as I personally love all the over-the-top action, I agree on the first Smith fight in the park. It’s about 3 minutes too long imo.

    • osanna@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      don’t even get me started on resurections. Holy shit. It is bullshit that that movie is now canon :/

      • WhoIsTheDrizzle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m not 100%, but I’m pretty sure Lana undertook it to destroy the series and get the movie studio to stop asking for sequels. It’s like the central theme of the movie.

        • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          The latest Gundam series is like that. The GQUUUUX one. “LET THINGS DIE AND MAKE NEW THINGS INSTEAD” says the original Gundam from the original series in the same art style while looking directly into the camera.

  • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    At this point Jurassic Park movies are whatever. The first one is awesome, the sequels disappoint.

    I was like 9 when Jurassic Park came out. My impression of any movie will never be topped simply due being a jaded old man now. The Jurassic World movies aren’t as good but it’s still dinosaurs. I’m entertained for a couple hours and that’s enough.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 days ago

    It would be far more interesting to ask, what movie franchise DOESN’T get worse with each new film.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Aliens, Terminator 2, The Dark Knight are the first three that come to mind - but yes, in general sequels tend to be inferior.

    • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      John Wick? They are not like the best movies in the world but they do get better.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Alien at least had the second film better than the first, which was a hell of an accomplishment since the first film was great. Fortunately they never even made any movies after the second one.

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Come on, now. The third was OK, the fourth was enjoyable, and Romulus was phenomenal. It was basically “let’s take the best bits from Alien and Aliens and stick them together” and they did it brilliantly.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          C’mon, killing off Newt and Hicks at the start of the third was unconscionable. It’s in the same category as “somehow, Palpatine returned”.

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            “Somehow Palpatine returned” is lazy writing forced on them due to Snoke dying in the previous film.

            Hicks and Newt dying is perfectly reasonable in the world the action takes place in.

        • detren@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          If you go by release date then that can’t be true considering the prequels (even though I love them). TFA was also so bland compared to the rest. The Last Jedi was the only decent one since the original trilogy imo.

          But oh my god rise of skywalker is so fucking bad.

          • BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            rise of skywalker was so terrible they should have let rian johnson just do his thing again, even if people hated it like TLJ at least it would have had some thought put into it

        • osanna@lemmy.vg
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          i liked TFA. It was a decent flick. But then they just got so. much. worse.

            • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              TLJ would’ve been a great third film in a trilogy. It absolutely sucks balls as the second film. It killed practically all the story lines from the first, leaving basically nothing for the third, including the main bad guy. Hux would’ve never been a good “ultimate enemy”, and if Kylo Ren became one, it would completely overturn everything the previous eight films worked on.

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            TFA TLJ would’ve been a great third film in a trilogy. It absolutely sucks balls as the second film. It killed practically all the story lines from the first, leaving basically nothing for the third, including the main bad guy. Hux would’ve never been a good “ultimate enemy”, and if Kylo Ren became one, it would completely overturn everything the previous eight films worked on.

  • osanna@lemmy.vg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    honestly, star wars. I’m a HUGE star wars fan, but they’re the same movie repeatedly. blow up death star, blow up bigger death star. blow up BIGGEST death star. BAM. 9 movies.

    • weew@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      If you take each trilogy as a set, sure.

      But Empire and Return were both amazing films that one-upped the original.

      And I think Clones was better than Phantom.

      The final trilogy was a straight fucking cliff both by itself and in comparison to the other trilogies.

    • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hmm… Kind of a weird take considering the Prequels had no blowing up of any super weapons, and the Sequels had only one, in the first film.

  • hobata@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    4 days ago

    Is there any what gets better? There are good sequels, but once it becomes movie franchise, it all turns to shit. Sometimes faster, sometimes slower.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        4 days ago

        Alien and Aliens. But only because Aliens was deliberately a different genre: so it’s a bit of a stretch.

      • Bonifratz@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        4 days ago

        Terminator 2 was better.

        I see this view everywhere all the time, but personally I strongly disagree. Terminator 2 is good no doubt, but the original had a sense of dread and urgency literally from start to finish that is unmatched in any of the sequels, in my opinion.

        • Klear@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Terminator 2 is the perfect sequel - expands on the original and shakes things up while maintaining the general feel. I don’t think it would be as highly praised if it wasn’t a followup on the first movie. It would still be a great movie in a vacuum, though, don’t get me wrong.

          As such, it’s pretty hard to compare the movies, it will always come down to personal taste.

      • hopesdead@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m sure there are people who will argue that Back to the Future Part II was the worst of the trilogy. Part III might be the best.

      • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Indiana Jones got better and better for the first 3. Then dumb.

        If the Cornetto trilogy counts I think hot fuzz was the peak.

      • WanderWisley@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        Definitely terminator 2. As well as the original Star Wars trilogy and back to the future trilogy are the few that I consider good all the way through.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        It being filmed together is it being a 6+ hour movie in 3 chapters. I think it’s a single project not successive films. Just how I frame it, I concede to technicalities if you must

        • Klear@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          I watched them back to back once and can confirm. They work perfectly as a single long movie.

    • Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Spiderman 2 was arguably better than Spiderman 1. 3 was worse tho.

      And being extremely malicious, I like two towers and return of the king more than the fellowship of the ring :)

    • Klear@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      Evil Dead, at least for me. I enjoyed the first movies but absolutely love Army of Darkness.

      The James Bond franchise gets better over time arguably. It has ups and downs, but I definitely wouldn’t say it’s downward trend overall.

      Mad Max.

    • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      The Sergio Leone trilogy with Clint Eastwood arguably gets better. The first one was almost a shot-for-shot remake of Yojimbo - good but derivative. The third movie stood up well against the early ones and the music was maybe the best.

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Franchises where the second film is more broadly acclaimed than the first: Star Wars, The Godfather, The Dark Knight, arguably Alien, Terminator, Star Trek, Paddington, Rocky, James Bond, The Pink Panther, Mad Max. Ones where the third film is the most acclaimed: arguably Indiana Jones, maybe Toy Story, LOTR (kind of all a merged movie so doesn’t count), The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, Star Wars prequels

      • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Hahaha. Now do a set where the second movie was better than the first but the third movie was absolutely awful.

    • Ace T'Ken@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’d argue the original Evil Dead trilogy get progressively better with each movie.

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not a fan of the Scream movies, but just saw a video of a guy talking about how each one gets better than the last one mainly because they are self aware of being sequels and use that to enrich the narrative

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Tron, if you care about the music. Going from peak (Wendy Carlos) to peak (Daft Punk) to peak (Nine Inch Nails) even if the movies are bad.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ouija 2 Origin of Evil by Mike Flannigan is the rare exception where the sequel trounced the OG in every way.

      The Librarian also all three movies are good, with the third being arguably the best.

    • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      So long as you can put yourself in the headspace, the fast and furious movies do get better when you realize that every movie is the exact same film (besides Tokyo drift anyway), but with higher stakes than the last one, to kind of absurd levels - starts with street racing, ends up in space, through so many movies.

      But that’s kind of a meta analysis based on what they are, not the actual quality, none of them are amazing, but fine if you can turn your brain off for a bit

  • Ilixtze@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Alien has been in slow decline but it’s steady, the puppy dog alien of alien:earth was the latest offender.

    Also: do we really need so many terminator movies?

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Any of the classic Disney animated movies. First movie is a ripoff of classic fairy tales so most of the heavy lifting writing wise was done for them, the instant Disney has to write the whole thing is when it goes to shit. If it’s “Disney presents [insert fairy tale here] 2” you know it’ll suck.

      • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        It should have ended at the -1th movie

        I joke. I ironically love those films because they are terrible.

        Nobody likes the tuna here, asshole!

        • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          The first movie was serious, but as they progress they lean in on the silliness. Going to space was the cherry on the cake.

          • Zahille7@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            The goddamn spinoff dealing with a rogue supersoldier, and the two leads basically being superhuman already.

            I only watched a couple minutes, but that was more than I could handle.

        • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          The lord of the rings trilogy could be a single long movie. I feel like it fits but really isn’t in the spirt of the question.

          I feel like it needs to be “First movie was so good, so they made a sequel”

          • fizzbang@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I think the mainstream opinion is that the two towers is the best. I’m curious, why do you favor the fellowship?

            • DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 days ago

              This is a bit rambly, but bear with me. I am very much enamored with the Hobbits and the Shire. Though I prefer the theatrical release (the pacing in that version is perfect), Concerning Hobbits is a fantastic inclusion in the extended version and I love getting that extra time in the Shire. There is a feeling of quaint magic in that movie that isn’t present in the other ones. I like that the film is told from the perspective of Hobbits. It makes the world outside the Shire that much more mysterious and foreboding, some of which I feel is lost when the Fellowship splits up. I think Gandalf the Grey is a vastly more interesting character than Gandalf the White. I personally find underground spaces incredibly fascinating, so everything in Moria is just incredible. That moment where they’re surrounded by goblins and you hear the rumble of the Balrog, and the goblins flee and Gandalf is just, “Run.” Ugh, its got a great sense of terror and is just perfect.

              • fizzbang@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I’m here for the rambles.

                I think you have an interesting perspective. The shire kind of grounds the world as a reader / viewer. It’s the place you want to get back to.

        • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, the last 3 movies and TV series were amazing right? Like I didn’t fall asleep after 30min of each hobbit movie and the first 2 episodes of the series or anything. I have no recollection of anything that happened in any of those movies, other than that it was massive CGI circle jerk slop.

    • Q The Misanthrope @startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Equalizer series stayed consistent. John wick is probably close enough. Being the same movie over and over isn’t the same as declining.

      Bourne series too.