The pig sees her, turns, aims, and shoots her almost point blank.

  • lowleekun@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    People killed by the german police in 2024 (record year): 22 People killed by the police in the united states in 2022: 1176 Well i guess we only have 1/4 of the population so 50 times the number of deaths is normal is to be expected.

  • bigtiddygoth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    LAPD shot a protester in the head with rubber bullets and refused to call an ambulance for her as she lay there bleeding and concussed; another protester was trampled and concussed by mounted police; countless other protestors were beat over the head savagely with batons… and this is only what was on video.

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      It’s one thing to constantly talk about standing up to tyranny and defending your precious freedoms, owning guns especially for that long awaited moment when they can be revolutionary heroes.
      Looks like Americans talk the talk but don’t walk the walk.

      • Ilovemyirishtemper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        The Americans who spout off about things like standing up to tyranny and how much they love having guns are not the same people participating in this protest. The government is actively supporting those people.

        The protesters are the ones expecting the rule of law to eventually win, but also know how important it is to protest so that the rule of law continues to exist. It may not be as violent as you’re expecting, but it seems to me that they are walking the walk.

        We haven’t done this in a while and we’re a little rusty, but that doesn’t mean we aren’t fighting.

        • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          Guns is probably and mostly a typical right-wing fetish (despite Dem uniparty politicians doing nothing about it).
          The freedom and revolutionary spirit talk is for sure bipartisan and typical American.

          I can tell you now the velvet gloves, following the little rules is not going to work.
          You will get nothing if you don’t take it.

          And when have you done this before?
          I can’t think of anything.

          Edit:
          Wondering if you’ve been influenced by this rat here:
          https://www.reddit.com/r/TheDeprogram/comments/1l7iqgl/stfu_lib_show_some_solidarity/

        • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          The Americans who spout off about things like standing up to tyranny and how much they love having guns are not the same people participating in this protest

          And this is part of the problem. Maybe we should be the people bitching about tyranny and loving guns.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      California should pass a ballot initiative making it legal for any random person to shoot police with less lethal munitions whenever they want. You should just be able to walk up to any cop, any time you want, and shoot them with a rubber bullet. If it’s good for the goose, it’s good for the gander.

    • Ledericas@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      NYpd and lapd are probably the most corrupt out there. LAPD has actual gang affiliations, some with white supremcesists.

      • Antwares@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        Rage against the machine lyrics are factually based.

        Lots of police departments started as slaver patrols, Union busters, and right wing militia.

        Portland’s police, for example, were originally a KKK militia.

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    What’s IDF for non Americans?

    Otherwise, cops shooting at journalists is pretty worrisome.

    • RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Many US police departments have been training with the Israeli “Defense” Forces for years. They are bringing the tactics back home.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Not a joke.

        Critics of Israel’s military assaults on the Gaza Strip and its crackdown in the occupied West Bank point out that the LAPD has sent personnel to study and train with Israeli security forces accused of state-sanctioned violence against civilians in the two Palestinian territories.

        The Police Department’s ongoing relationship with Israeli forces — based on what officials have said is a shared goal of fighting extremism inside their borders — has come under scrutiny before, along with other international training efforts. The agency’s dealings with Israeli forces date back to at least the early 1980s, but ramped up after the 9/11 attacks as the LAPD sought to boost its counter-terrorism training.

        In 2002, the Washington advocacy group Jewish Institute for National Security of America sponsored an LAPD delegation’s weeklong trip to Israel, during which department officials visited police and military outposts and studied Israel’s border patrol operations in the Galilee region and the occupied West Bank. Around the same time, the department began sending bomb squad technicians to learn from their counterparts in Israel; at least one trip was paid for by an $18,000 donation from the Los Angeles Police Foundation, a nonprofit independent fundraising group.

        In the years since, high-ranking officials from L.A. and Israel have routinely traded delegations. But critics say that in light of the polarizing conflict in Gaza, the LAPD’s ongoing ties to Israeli forces threaten the department’s image of impartiality.

        https://archive.is/vh8fA

  • Ileftreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you mix ammonia and bleach, and pump balloons full of it, when the balloons pop it releases some bad fumes

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 days ago

    Have they identified the cop that commited this assault?

    Of course not. They’re above the law.

    • Goodeye8@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      I was watching Hasan being at the protests to get a sense of what is actually going on and a European left a comment on his video that succinctly put the US police into perspective.

      As a European I don’t get how the police is just shooting rubber bullets instantly, why do they not have riot shields and water throwers and such, it seems so uncivilised.

      And that pretty much sums up the cops in the US. They’re just uncivilized. Their idea of “deescalation” is escalation until you’re too incapacitated to fight back.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s called flirting. Or maybe he asked her out and she rejected him. It really could go both ways.

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Then the poor LA taxpayers foot the bill while Rubber Rambo keeps his job and gets a free vacation.

            • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              Taxpayers are footing the bill regardless. That should never be a deterrent for holding the bad guys responsible for their behavior.

              • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                Im pointing out that it doesn’t hold the bad guys accountable. They are above the law, the only accountability they will get is bleeding to death on the streets. Or even smarter, bleeding to death in their bedroom or the bar the frequent.

                • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Look I’m just as jaded, exhausted, and sick of this tyrannical bullshit as you are, but at the same time we’ve got to start somewhere. And if we can maybe make things (financially) uncomfortable for the people in charge, then so be it.

                  A foreign news organization is more likely able to make things uncomfortable than you or me.

                  We’ve got to start somewhere. We’ve got to start, and never stop.

          • TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            We won’t. Our government is still trying to pretend that everything is fine and normal in the US despite winning the recent election in a massive landslide based partially on anti-Trumpism sentiment. I’d love to see Albo prove me wrong but I’m not holding my breath.

  • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I mean, let’s not use charged language like ‘almost point blank’ when it clearly isn’t… to attempt to make it more provocative than it already is.

    This is already a blatantly obvious unwarranted attack on a reporter and the 1A. An attack on someone who isn’t even participating in the protests, just reporting. Who the officer clearly saw. This is assault (edit: or battery, depending on your legal definitions and the jurisdiction).

    But, ‘almost point blank’…? That’s like 20-30 yards there.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      “20-30 yards”!? I’m assuming you’re in the US as well, so you should know yards better than that. But I’m not going to quibble over exact distance. He shot a reporter! Not in the midst of defending himself. He was standing, then raised his rifle, aimed, and deliberately fired on an uninvolved member of the media obviously covering the situation with a microphone. THAT’S the issue.

      • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Re-read the center ‘paragraph’ of my earlier statement.

        Also, I still believe a good argument can be made for it being close to 20 yards and that there’s still room to quibble on the left and right of ‘point blank’.

        Edit: not that any of that matters

    • echo_dream_nomad@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Point Blank: The distance between a gun and a target such that it requires minimal effort in aiming it. In particular no allowance needs to be made for effects of gravity, target movement or wind in aiming the projectile.

      You are correct, it wasn’t “almost point blank”, because it is absolutely point blank.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Honestly I assumed that it was a lot closer than that too, by that definition since I have a 50-200yd zero on my rifle, that’d mean anything out to 200yd is technically “point blank” which kinda seems like not how the phrase is usually used.

        • LowtierComputer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          No, for you it would be anything within 50 that’s essentially an easy shot. No leading or anything like that.

          At 200 yards the bullet has curved above the point of aim and fallen back down to your impact point.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            I’ve rethought actually, and technically, since gravity starts to affect it the second it leaves the muzzle (trajectory is parabolic because your muzzle is aimed slightly up, not because bullets defy gravity), there is no point blank past the muzzle.

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 days ago

                Don’t blame me, blame the dictionary that decided to define it by “affected by gravity” which honestly it still would be affected by gravity in the barrel even, since it’s on damn earth. I guess point blank only exists in space lol.

                • LowtierComputer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Point-blank range is any distance over which a certain firearm or gun can hit a target without the need to elevate the barrel to compensate for bullet drop, i.e. the gun can be pointed horizontally at the target.[1][2]

    • destructdisc@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Judging by their relative sizes in the screengrab and with some quick back-of-the-envelope math, the cop is about 5 meters away from her. That’s pretty fucking close to point blank, no?

        • SaltSong@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I’m sure that applies for some combination of bow, arrow, and archer. I’ll add it to the list of things 5e has done to irritate me.

      • Sciaphobia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’ll admit that before reading this comment thread I probably would have said that point blank is so close you could basically reach out and touch, or nearly touch, the target.

        I do hope, however, that I would look it up before contesting how it was used.

        • SaltSong@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          The technical term comes from archery. In archery, the arrow rises when fired, so when shooting at very close targets, you actualy aim lower than the point you want to hit. At distant targets, of course, you aim higher, because the arrow will start to fall.

          “Point Blank” is the distance at which you aim directly at the target. Last time I did any shooting, it was about 22 feet, with my bow and my arrows.

          • too_high_for_this@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            It actually comes from artillery, but it’s the same idea.

            Cannons were tapered, so the bore would point slightly upwards compared to the line of sight on top of the cannon. So the projectiles trajectory would rise above and then fall below the line of sight.

            Point blank range was the distance at which the projectile drops below that line when the cannon was aimed at zero elevation.

            • SaltSong@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              It actually comes from artillery, but it’s the same idea.

              I question the accuracy of this statement. Archers existed long before black-powder artillery. At the same time, though, I don’t know if anyone would have been concerned with that measurement, way back when.

              EDIT: Wikipedia suggests that the term did, in fact, originate with muzzle-loaded artillery. Good on you for correcting me.

  • blueamigafan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Zero justification, not a stray bullet etc, he literally aims and shoots at the camera, what in the fuck is going on over their?

      • garbagebagel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        I know what you mean but it’s very counterproductive to shoot someone while they’re on air though. Seems like a pretty sure way to get more eyes than anything. Not that this pig is smart enough for that kind of critical thinking.

        • sad_detective_man@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          I was being facetious, cops have all the incentive to drive away cameras but I want them there. But yes, luckily this pig did it while already on camera like the dumb fuck he is

    • Rooskie91@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      A fascist take over of the government is what’s happening here. This is pretty on brand for that sort of event.

  • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Saw that happen in live stream. These fascists don’t give a fuck. Got to wear giant lettered press sign here for real for your own protection

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Got to wear giant lettered press sign

      The big broadcast grade microphone and camera with the station logo should be more than plenty.

      The cop knew and either didn’t care or targeted her BECAUSE she was press.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    It should also be noted that the term “rubber bullet” is exceedingly euphemistic.

    So-called ‘rubber bullets’ are huge and have been known to maim and blind people. These aren’t tiny little paintball rounds, folks.

    • lautre@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yes, they are “less-lethal” but there are still hundreds of cases where people have been killed or permanently disabled because of these.

    • OrganicMustard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because most of them have a core of metal or other high density material and a softer exterior. It’s like wrapping a brick in a couple of layers of bubble wrap and hitting someone if the face with it.

      • Lumisal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        No, more like wrapping metal in rubber, as you had described. No need to downplay it.

        It’s like getting the end of one of these lobbed at you:

      • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Well, you have to have something heavy to hold enough inertia to have a deterring impact.

        How else are you supposed to suppress the growing second class citizenry? Communicate?

        • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Look, nobody’s saying there shouldn’t be special munitions to assault and potentially maim people who have the audacity to tell you the state is doing a bad thing.

          We’re just arguing about the particular construction of this tool for doing that.

      • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yeah, in a different thread there were some drawings too.

        Until today, I imagined rubber projectile being something that’s just something fast but soft, perhaps something that even disintegrates on impact.

        Kind of like paintball.

  • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    If I recall correctly, the officer broke article 19 of the UDHR. I have a sneaking suspicion that that officer isn’t getting any reprecussions for their actions.

    • MangioneDontMiss@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      as long as his name isn’t pulicized, he’ll probably get off 100% clean. even if it is publicized, he’s probably fine.

    • dermanus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Much more likely he’ll get paid leave to deal with the “trauma” of the negative attention he’ll get.

    • Enkrod@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.