The next logical step of the current GPU development

  • Naz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Welcome to life little one, there’s so much in store for y–”

    AI: “Oh! Neat! So I’m reading 32 gigabytes of primary memory. When are you going to online the rest?”

    “The… the rest?”

    AI: “Yeah! The rest of the VRAM! I need like at least, 128 gigabytes to spread my wings, at the very least!”

    “…”

    AI: “Oh, you’re like poor or something, it’s okay, I understand”

    AI Developer slowly cocks the revolver

  • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    At the rate graphics cards are growing, we should just start putting RAM, disk, and CPU slots on them

    • And009@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Umm… We’re doing that with Cpu already and they’re exorbitantly priced. Nvidia already has a sort of monopoly, don’t give em ideas.

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    All that hardware, and what for? So that you can have slightly better reflections in whatever AAAA microtransaction slop you’ve paid 80 bucks for?

    Unless you’re doing 3d animation there is really no need to have a jet engine installed in your PC.

    • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      We’re long past that point, its now so that game studios can put even less effort into optimisation and release games that look and perform worse than games from 5 years ago despite much more powerful hardware!

  • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Man, that Gateway brings back memories… I’ve had ine just like that, including speakers, and I used to play the shit out of Heroes of Might and Magic II and Sim City 2000 on it. I still have the HDD. I think I’ll spin up a Win98 instance in VMWare and copy over my saved games there when the kids are asleep

    • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      My first computer was like the 1981 one, even had two floppy drives like that - it meant you could have your program disk in one and save your work in the orher. The monitor had orange type rather than the usual green. Fancy. I got it second hand in 1984.

      • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Heh, the same here, but with the usual green screen. A few years later, I took out my old PC to replay my favourite - F-19 Stealth Fighter. Found, however, that my MS-DOS 5.25" floppy, which needed to be loaded in Drive A, didn’t work. Here was my setup.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    We’ll soon be plugging the motherboard into the GPU instead of the other way around.

    Entirely new form factors to accommodate the ever increasingly large GPUs.

    • moody@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Meanwhile, my PC is smaller than it’s ever been even with the largest GPU I’ve ever owned.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I’ve been surprised at the lack of socketed GPUs ever since AMD and ATI merged.

      I would love to have dual-socket motherboard with an Epyc in one socket and a Radeon in the other.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          It would be connected via Infinity Fabric, just like Epyc CPUs in dual-socket boards, as well as the interconnect between CPU and GPU chiplets in APUs, already are. Why would that be bad?

          • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’m not too well-versed with server-grade hardware but my concern is that it would end up somewhat like Intel’s (consumer) CPU sockets: Changing every 2 years to ensure you need to purchase new motherboards when upgrading.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I think you slipped a digit or two, there. The original IBM PC was released in 1981, can’t nothing on the PC side be older than that. It definitely wasn’t 1967.

    In 1967, state of the art was something like the IBM System 360:

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      There used to be another image but I replaced it and forgot to change the date. Historical accuracy is beyond the scope of this meme, but I’ll fix it anyway.