From the report: “The Committee determined there is substantial evidence that Representative Gaetz violated House Rules and other standards of conduct prohibiting prostitution, statutory rape, illicit drug use, impermissible gifts, special favors or privileges, and obstruction of Congress.”

More: “The record overwhelmingly suggests that Representative Gaetz had sex with multiple women at a 2017 Florida party, including the then-17-year-old, for which they were paid… Victim A recalled receiving $400 in cash from Representative Gaetz that evening, which she understood to be payment for sex. At the time, she had just completed her junior year of high school. Victim A said that she did not inform Representative Gaetz that she was under 18 at the time, nor did he ask her age.”

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Pretty sure both of those things violate federal laws too. Not that laws matter with Donvict in charge.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      3 days ago

      They didn’t matter with Garland in charge and that’s at least as big of a problem. Whoever manages to remove Trump from office needs to finally hold the whole criminal apparatus that has propped up the Republican party for decades accountable.

        • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          You set a shocking precedent and then write into law that it can never be done again. Pretty much play the Republican game except better. In fact, this could fix pretty much everything. Enact incredible, and sometimes extremely grey, choices and decisions to repair things. Then make sure it could never legally happen again.

          The person or people doing this would have to immediately step down. I would prefer if they took a hit for the team to really cement the sacrifice. Alas, we do not live in that sort of world.

        • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          The official answer is a constitutional amendment. It seems wild to me that these ever had a chance of passing.

        • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Charge them for their criminal conduct (e.g. taking bribes), arrest and jail them, impeach them, convict them, and finally imprison them. After that, we should think about reforming the way we select our federal judges and adding seats to different benches.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      I dont think there are comparable federal laws for rape. Human trafficking and wire fraud, sure but rape is dependant on the laws of the state. The Federal case was hampered by the lack of credible witnesses. The state of Florida will do nothing because DeSantis and Rapey are good friends.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not many people seem to know about the lack of witnesses and think dropping the case was garden variety corruption.

        But! The (former) minor in question and his good buddy Joel have both been happily singing their little hearts out. Wish they had sung early enough to nail him, but I’m happy enough they finally talked. And boy did a bunch of other people talk!

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Joel stole millions of dollars while being tax collector of a Florida county. What did he do with that money. He, and his good friend Matt used it as fuel for coke and sex parties. So he rolled on Matt. He’s now in jail for federal fraud charges.

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s a trafficking charge. But, as far as I know, the Feds had a problem with credible witnesses. The victim is now working as a porn star. The DOJ thought that they shouldn’t prosecute a case they would lose.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Sex trafficking is the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, obtaining, patronizing, or soliciting of a person for the purposes of a commercial sex act, in which the commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such an act has not attained 18 years of age (22 USC § 7102).

          None of that applies here.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The article I read earlier said he broke federal laws too. Yet I keep seeing the headline worded this way, seemingly to soften the truth. So fucking disgusting, this country

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The age of consent is 18 in only 10 states, Florida being one of them. And I’m certain you can’t be nailed for past drug use. Also, they cleared him on interstate sex trafficking.

      So what can we nail him for? Florida can surely proceed with statutory rape. Not sure what else. How about hiring prostitutes?

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, so basically because he kept his statutory rape to a single state, and that states corrupt governor will never prosecute him then he gets away with it. Ron DeSantis needs to be fired. Preferably out of a cannon into the sun.

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            In theory or in practice? In theory I’m sure a whole laundry list. In practice absolutely nothing because literally everyone in a position to do something is either corrupt or incompetent.