Yeah fuck this take. Doxxing happens to decent people all the time. I’m not about to stand against it happening to one of the worst.

Some Republican fuckwad will screenshot your comment and use that to argue that Democrats are not accepting the election results. I’m not disagreeing with you, just expressing my endless cynicism, newly expanded Wednesday morning

You seem confused. Their reporting here was that trump claimed not to be associated with the document, but in reality is. Maybe you don’t like their wording?

Oh yep I gotcha, that does make sense

Hmm, interesting. I couldn’t tell you really, other than I selected an option that is supposed to be slightly on the higher-risk/high-growth potential side

He read the sentence he wanted, essentially summarizing Trump’s claim, and ignored everything else. What is AP supposed to do about that kind of idiocy? You could do that with practically any source of information

What you all are really saying is that you want media to be more left leaning. The example people keep citing is AP, but they literally called out that he was associated with the creators of the document. Should they have used the word “lie”, well, yes I think so personally, but there is a danger in further appearing biased. I can settle for refuting his claim the way they did despite my preference. This is not some obvious right wing leaning like people ITT seem to think.

Nope. Not what you’re saying it is. They call out its origin even.

The plan was written up by many of his former aides and allies,

They also briefly mention what he claims. That is in no way corroborating it. They are simply trying to avoid seeming biased. The other time “2025” appears in that page, it’s a quote from Harris about how dangerous it is.

This is normal and decent journalism.

sceptical

susceptible*

So it’s a foregone conclusion that resistance or even discussion is futile?

Besides fox News and the like, who said that?

What am I missing here? Two sentences telling us his claims isn’t the complete failure of journalism y’all seem to be insinuating it is…

That is absolutely horrifying

Sounds like a perfectly great idea /s

“Nah guys, we’re good on money, thanks. Got enough.”

Well shit color me Trupid – I missed one of the braindead anti-ideas

I might know which user said that to you. I had a run in like that too. They kept telling how I was objectively a fascist for agreeing with the sentiment – was explicitly explaining that I am not sure how you would implement it precisely, but that it was understandable. NO ITS fAsCisT and UnCoNsTitUtIoNaL!!!

This honestly makes so much more sense than anything else. I think you nailed it. Republicans are motivated by money and exerting social control so they write up manifestos (p2025), take over the courts, work hard to disenfranchise voters, lie, cheat, anything is on the table. The DNC does indeed seem fairly comfortable with losing by comparison, despite the fact that the leftist ideals they supposedly dabble in create a moral imperative to never lose. I wonder if Republicans fucking pay the DNC money to run these candidates we all know aren’t the best. They’re just good enough to get votes against mother fucking Trump. But not always good enough to win, barely good enough when they are, typically.

It’s downright sad that I can’t think of any argument against this.

:crying_blood: