Summary

Donald Trump criticized Panama Canal fees as “ridiculous” and demanded lower costs or the canal’s return to the US.

In a Truth Social post, Trump also expressed concern about potential Chinese influence over the waterway, despite no direct Chinese control of canal operations.

The canal, transferred to Panama in 1999, is vital for global trade, handling 5% of maritime traffic.

Trump’s comments follow record revenues of $5 billion announced by the Panama Canal Authority. Panama has not yet responded to his statements.

  • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    176
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    The UK criticized US presidents mental health as ridiculous and demanded to increase the IQ requirements or the USA return to the UK

      • LordCrom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        In the late 1700s it took months to get election results. Things that seemed normal hundreds of years ago…such as allowing bearing of arms in the form of a musket that maybe shot 1 bullet every 3 minutes… Today they are crazy…same rule applies to a machine gun that can spray hundreds of bullets in same time frame. The founding fathers had no idea what was to come.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          They also saw the constitution as a living document that should change with the times. The bill of rights was already in the pipeline when it was signed. There have been barely any changes since due to the impossibility of getting 3/4 of states to agree on if water is wet, let alone something important.

        • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          such as allowing bearing of arms in the form of a musket that maybe shot 1 bullet every 3 minutes… Today they are crazy…same rule applies to a machine gun that can spray hundreds of bullets in same time frame.

          I get where you’re coming from but in regards to the above, this isn’t remotely true.

          Old powder fired guns made before a certain date (I think it’s like 1850?) can be owned by anyone, even felons.

          Modern firearms require a background check and other requirements to be purchased from a legit store.

          Short barrel rifles and suppressors require additional ATF checks, forms and taxes.

          Machineguns have even more regulations on top of all that.

          In addition, the seller is required to abide by additional rules, regulations, inspections, etc.

          Source: https://regulations.atf.gov/

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        Lots of things about our elections were designed with the assumption that it would take ages for people to get anywhere, hence the delay. Not really relevant anymore, though.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          In the future, the US will finally make a constitutional amendment that fixes this, and a decade later we’ll develop human teleportation, but it’ll be another 100 years before they get to updating the constitution again.

          • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            The constitution requires 3/4 of states to agree to an amendment. This kinda made sense when it was written. Now, unless something changes drastically, I can’t see the constitution amended ever again.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 days ago

          This specific problem, probably not, but in general the 2 month lame duck session is a problem. It creates a period of no accountability for the president giving up their power, and the window makes doing things internationally more difficult as the incoming president may do things differently and cancel/change things.

          • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            That’s one of the things about Trump that I think isn’t talked about enough. Now any agreements signed by the US seem like a crapshoot because the next guy in is just going to pull out or cancel them. Trump will do it for a second time to the Paris climate agreement. What about a peace treaty? Or a mutual defense pact? Why should another county trust us?

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        The only thing getting trump in office sooner would get us is ending the “american experiment” sooner. I’m not looking forward to that. Its evidently time for republican traitors to push us off the cliff we have collectively pushed so many other peoples off of. Not used to the idea that we have real consequential pain coming.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      As are we… As are we.

      Our own government is so deeply corrupted with corporate interests, hate, and fascism it feels hopeless.

      I can only hope that this government tries to make too many bad decisions and America gets the backlash it deserves.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Why is my government, not even in office yet, so offensive that I usually support “the enemy”? Even the fact that so many normal countries and institutions are “the enemy” is so effing ridiculous.

      Next thing you know, we’re picking a fight with World Health Organization, because apparently sick and dying kids are “the enemy”

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      If its any small consolation, the evil, lies, and idiocy built into our system are finally causing us to turn the violence inward toward the system itself, and increasingly toward Americans. History shows that its the nature of this sort of corrupt governance always turns inward on itself eventually. It just takes far, far too long, and there is no restorative justice at the end. And the cycle continues without learnings from our history.

      I wish american citizens could give you something better than that, but we honestly don’t know how. From one human being to another, I’m sorry, and what happened to your people should not have happened.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s not that there’s someone intentionally deciding when and what Mr Trump should say that is the most insulting and offensive thing possible from one minute to the next … but that’s impossible to prove with the evidence at-hand.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        and another 50 cleaning up the huuuge shit pile left behind.

        and that’s an optimistic estimate, requiring voters to choose planet and (all) people over party and self from here on.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            5 days ago

            The shit that he broke last time still hasn’t been fixed yet.

            It takes a lot more time, effort, and money to build or repair than it doesn’t to break stuff.

            Even if Trump Vance and Musk all die in a plane crash, the rest of the MAGA-GOP would still be there being insane, and Project 2025 would still be grinding along puppetering whoever the next republican leader is.

        • seejur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 days ago

          You forget Musk-fuelled presidencies that set us back even more while we try to repair the damages, because morons keep voting R no matter what

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      When he’s the President of the United States, yes we will. Unfortunately.

      We were so fucking close to never having to hear about this piece of shit ever again.

      • fxomt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Not all of us are American, I for one would love to block all news from the US; It’s extra salt in the wound that this was posted on WORLD news.

          • fxomt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            5 days ago

            It’s about trump threatening panama, is that not US politics to you?

            The main focus here is clearly the US, panama is just the subject.

              • fxomt@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                19
                ·
                5 days ago

                What would US politics be, then?

                This is about the US, and its diplomacy with panama. It is not, by definition, international politics. The US and trump, as i said, are clearly the focus in this article. If it was vice versa, ie, X country interacting with the US, for example, it would be passable. This is US internal politics.

                Why couldn’t have this been posted to a US news community? why this of all places?

                • njm1314@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  23
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Yes by definition the diplomacy between two Nations is International politics. If it was internal us politics then it would be United States politics. I’m not sure what’s complicated about this, it’s common sense.

                  Of course it could also be posted to a US News community. It could also be posted to a Panama news Community I suppose. Sometimes posts are appropriate more than one community.

                • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  By your own logic, that wouldn’t be international news - it would be x country news and shouldn’t be posted here either. Why would it be “passable” if the news was about another country doing it?

                  When Trump starts threatening to glass the EU with ICBMs, would that be US news only and not international? After all, it would be about the US and its arsenal of nuclear weapons.

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  What would US politics be, then?

                  Anything related to domestic policy? News from the regional, state and/or local levels?

            • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              5 days ago

              When one country’s (soon to be) leader directly threatens another country, this is by definition “international”.

              I agree that Trump is getting far more attention that a person like him deserves, but him being the next head of a major nation makes him impossible to completely ignore.

              • fxomt@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                Yup, as i said in another comment, i’ve changed my mind. I just really am annoyed of hearing of trump all the time, and made this comment.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              This does seem important globally. We know from history, and this shows he’s starting again from before he matters, that US diplomacy will be threaten first. Unfortunately this what y’all have to look forward to as our way of doing business, with allies, independents, and competitors

        • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 days ago

          This one may not be that important, but I would like to remind you that unfortunately the bullshit 'murica does does affect the rest of us.

          • fxomt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yep, i agree. It’s just really tiring to see US news most of the time. This was probably a knee jerk reaction from me. Sorry.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    5 days ago

    I wonder who even brought up the Canal and why? You know there’s no way in hell he thought of that on his own.

  • NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    The next 4 years are gonna be a blast. Thanks America!

    The trauma of 2016-2020 was still raw, but you guys really love sequels!

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Get armed, take a safety class, and be ready with your weapons and first aid supplies. Get some wound vacs and learn how to use them, you could save someone’s life.

        If you really want to help fix it, join or start a local mutual aid group. This is where I stall out. I work and travel so much I need my days off to make my back not hurt so much and reset my brain.

    • Luci@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      4 years eh? Didn’t he already signal that he wanted to kill the term limit??

          • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Exactly it’s just a piece of paper if it’s not actually enforced it means nothing.

            Just like all the laws and regulations that are regularly broken and ignored by the rich and have no enforcement.

            The law doesn’t mean anything anymore if you have enough money and power. And when the law and justice system fail the citizenry it’s the citizens job to take the law into their own hands.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    At this point, I’m on board with a global trade war against the US. Build your stupid wall, surround yourselves with it and rot in the Maga stew you voted for. Come back out to talk to us when you’re ready.

  • BoofStroke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Trump is that old lady in a backed up check out line arguing with the cashier over her expired coupon. And paying with a check.

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 days ago

    The canal is on a crash course with climate change. They’re going to need absolutely massive investment to operate once the lake dries up, and they’re not pulling in massive profits to pay for that. If Trump wants lower fees, he best be ready to pay for them. The reality though is that he’s probably just betting on failure.

    • wjrii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      So I guess the drought finally eased, and the reservoir that supplies the fresh water for the locks is doing better, but yeah, even with a new dam that should finally get started soon, the canal probably has 50 years or less as a viable commercial route, though honestly 150+ years isn’t a bad run as an economic project, and one of Jimmy Carter’s most humane legacies was overseeing its transfer back to the people who were dominated into letting Americans build it in the first place.

      • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think someone looking to milk billions in government contracts has been talking to Trump, and offering kick backs.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I watched a documentary that the canal also tamed the yearly monsoon. I think that’s where they get the water. Granted we’re in for a rollercoaster on rain too.