Do you know why that would be a positive evolutionarily trait? Clearly, if they try to retract it, at some point in the history they must have been able to do so.
Do you know why that would be a positive evolutionarily trait? Clearly, if they try to retract it, at some point in the history they must have been able to do so.
Valid reason to bring it back.
You should be. On average, 1 in 6 children will be abducted by the Dutch.
Subscription for Internet access is the one that’s always baffled me. What a stupid business model. I guess devices not belonging to their buyers is not a new thing.
Firstly, the issuing authority’s abbreviation is there. In all the languages. Secondly, the denomination is printed in a way that’s intelligible to all nations :)
Why would it be 200? Imo it should be either 400 or 401.
And that’s why I’ll never give up my domain. Those vultures will immediately snap it.
I don’t recommend hosting a Lemmy just for yourself. How federation currently works is it mirrors EVERYTHING. Your disk will be filled up with images you never even view and you put yourself at risk of having illegal imagery on your machine if you don’t actively keep up with which instances you must ban.
Nobody is about to redesign it again. I think having exactly TWO designs ever is completely fair and you cannot speak of any unnecessarily frequent changes here. The redesign that did happen was crucial for security (a lot of new anti-forgery features added, included ones that are meant to be easy to check for tourists or otherwise) and accessibility.
You’re right, my bad.
OP’s security concern is valid. Different CAs may differ in the challenges used to verify you to be the domain owner. Using something that you could crack may lead to an attacker’s public key being certified instead.
This could for example be the case with HTTPS verification (place a file with a specific content accessible through your URL) if the website has lacking input sanitization and/or creates files with the user’s input at an unfortunate location that collides with the challenge.
This attack vector might be far-fetched, but there can certainly be differences between different signing authorities.
Not quite. Picture an immutable map in your programming language of choice (something like const map). You cannot reassign the map object to a new one, but you totally can change its keys and values.
These are approximations at best. Not every flour type has the same density and even the same type can differ as the thread op pointed out.
Do you still need help with docker?
An ee-mail? Do I need to go to the post office for that?
While I believe they really could, that would be really stupid. Is creating a hotspot with your phone suddenly also not allowed? Because that’s all it essentially is.
Haaaaaiiiiiiiiii
How close to vim’s functionality is evil mode? I’ve been toying with the idea of learning Emacs but I rely on Vim’s langmap and that is rarely implemented in Vim emulations / bindings.
Yet the review time is exponential with the size.