Egypt and Morocco Ws.

But various bros told me here on Lemmy that action at the international law level is meaningless.

Fascinating lack of good faith. Paired with your penchant for open ended leading questions, I’m ready to make the call: you’re trolling.

Edit: just to clarify by “word salad” I meant calling the Palestinians, i.e., a stateless, disposessed, oppressed, subject to apartheid, and genocided people… “moderately successful”. While at the same time making the assumption your interlocutor does not know the history. I mean, to be as polite a Greek as I can: go to the port and come back to tell me if the boats are bobbing.

Nice word salad. If you want people to learn more, say that (ideally also pointing to specific resources) instead of derailing discussions with open ended loaded questions.

The unsaid implication of your loaded question is that the absence of a Palestinian state is “the fault of the Palestinians”. The further implication is that “Israel has no partner for peace” even now. Basically, the implication being we need to keep doing whatever the Israeli right wants in perpetuity.

If by some miracle you’re not just parroting right wing pro-Israeli talking points, please elaborate what the hell you mean with your question instead.

You think that’s some kind of gotcha. It isn’t.

Reminder that teenagers are children.

Strange how this talk of “collateral” damage only applies to when Israelis kill civilians and not when, say, Hamas or Hezbollah do it.

Using your own despicable and dehumanizing approach, October the 7th merely had 797 “collateral victims” for the 379 legitimate Israeli security forces targets. And after all, the 2:1 civilian to military casualties ratio is basically the same as the IDF’s own record in Gaza.

Ah what to do, such is war…

No.

Fuck that barbaric way of devaluing the loss of human life.

Source: IDF said trust me bro.

Netanyahu desperately needs a regional war. How many people must die so that this bag of shit doesn’t face an Israeli judge for his scandals?

If the third parties abide by Brazilian law, they should have legal representation in the country and therefore can be pursued for circumventing the law?

And your evidence that Israel only targetted active duty Hezbollah combattants?

What a load of ghoulish warmongering. Oh it’s war? If Hezbollah had done this to Israelis, the world would be crying blood and vowing for Israel’s right to defend itself.

Jew media

Fuck off.

So like killing a “handful” of Israeli civilians would be “exceptionally good” if the target was a bunch of IDF reservists?

So, like, are Israeli reservists fair game for terror attacks?

Hm, sure taxes went up in that sense, but ultimately they funded some good social programs, such as universal daycare, expanded dental care etc. Plus the whole CERB thing during the pandemic. So, you know, the overall bottom line is not as clear cut. Unless we’re talking about your particular account.

I don’t know is any political party talking about bringing back the spousal split? All I’ve heard from Bitcoin Trump-lite is the “axe the tax” nonsense about the carbon tax.

None of them electoral politicians, like the ones we’re talking about here. Try again.

I’ve heard that the young’uns call “ohio” things that are weird and cringey.

Name specific policies. Otherwise, I dunno man, maybe you quit a good job or something.