Was recently banned from a whole bunch of DB0 communities for, as best as I can gather, downvoting once when I viewed by All (potentially accidentally while scrolling).

Important notes:

  1. I don’t use scripts.
  2. I don’t mass-downvote Communities. If I see a post I generally don’t like when browsing All, I may downvote one post, block the Community and move on.
  3. Some of the communities I was banned from don’t have any posts in them so I wouldn’t have been able to downvote anything.
  4. Of all of these Communities, in my history I downvoted one post in one of them. Voting in this manner is not vote manipulation. It’s quite literally a feature of the platform and as a mod of another Community, I would consider it pretty good etiquette.
  5. One of my bans reads “Appeal Granted, not a brigading member” but I’m still banned.
  6. I don’t troll.

WTF is going on here?

EDIT - Updated Info from the conversation below: In the initial image, you can see two “ban waves.”

The 10 bans three months ago stem from a single downvote in one Community. It was @Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com See here: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/34853477

I was called out by name for a single downvote and culled from a score of Communities I did not participate in by them.

The other bans from two months ago are from four total downvotes over a 10-month timeframe in one Community.

I have also stated in this thread that I don’t have issues with AI-gen images, but there are shoddy ones and well-done ones.

EDIT 2: Now unbanned from the ten Communities listed as “3 months ago” in my initial image, but have been banned from three more because of this thread with the reason given being “self-proclaimed anti-AI brigader” which are two things I didn’t claim to be. God dammit Lemmy…

  • Ace T'Ken@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I don’t make it a habit of downvoting images simply because they’re AI-gen, but there are well-done ones and horrible ones just like any images. Do they really ban for simply downvoting ANY AI image? That’s… kind of a lot.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes, a few of the mods will ban anyone who downvotes AI or misinformation without making a comment or because you downvoted ‘too many times’ or some other bullshit. My ‘systemic downvoting’ and ‘anti-ai harassment’ community bans are for downvoting a few posts and not being sorry about it.

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        i discovered i have several community bans for being an anti-ai troll. i find that so odd because like… i’m not trolling, i genuinely have concerns about a litany of issues surrounding ai such as the environmental cost, the double standard of corporate theft being okay and piracy being a serious crime, the ways the ai corporation ceos want to use ai vs how any technology should benefit the populace. i have a viewpoint, not an agenda. i also think and post about a wide variety of other topics. that said, if an ai community wants to block me, that’s fine, i was probably going to block them too. not because i think they’re wrong to have their community, but because i have zero interest in engaging there. it’s like how i block all communities in languages i don’t speak. it’s not an act of me censoring or hating them. it’s just me cleaning up my feed because it doesn’t make sense to be there

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m still trying to get my head around people giving votes that much attention. Maybe Lemmy has started getting refugees from other places that live and die by the arrows.

      Someone go in there and do the same thing and see what happens. I would but you’ve probably picked up on my apathy by this point.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The mods that banned me for ‘systemic down voting’ and ‘anti-ai harassment’ because I down voted a few AI posts and didn’t feel bad also lectured me about how horrible down voting is and how much it hurts the fediverse.

        My upvote to down vote ratio is far better than either of those two mods.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Because votes = views.

        If you make something and it instantly gets to -2 within seconds because of bot/trolls it means no one will ever see it.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Well luckily it was just AI slop and they didn’t actually make anything.

          • Deceptichum@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Creativity is in the idea.

            Drawing is dexterity not creativity.

            What is important is that what they made reflected what they wanted to, not that they used a pencil or a stylus.

            • Mac@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Disagree. Creativity is in the idea, the composition, and the execution.
              A prompter hardly even has the idea in the first place.

              On top of that: “drawing” is labor.

      • Skavau@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Not related to the OP here, but downvote trolls can be a problem for small communities trying to build up. I managed to discover the serial downvoters on my old lemm.ee comm and when I banned them (about 4 of them?) it had a huge impact. They didn’t all downvote /everything/ but they downvoted a lot of things, and no contribution. And if they got in early, they could sink new threads. Now, I wouldn’t just ban randoms for occasional downvotes - but if I kept seeing the same names on threads (and they never actually engaged with the community) with no discernable patterns - I might.

        Made a huge difference.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Thank you for limiting your bans to people who were actual serial down voters and not just someone who happened to down vote a single post.