David Gerard@awful.systemsM to SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish · 2 months agoyour Bayesian yacht is an outlier adn should not be countedwww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up131arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: goodlongread@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
arrow-up131arrow-down1external-linkyour Bayesian yacht is an outlier adn should not be countedwww.nytimes.comDavid Gerard@awful.systemsM to SneerClub@awful.systemsEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square28fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: goodlongread@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
minus-squareswlabr@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoOk so if hubris somehow becomes a synonym of bayes I’d be all for it
minus-squareDavid Gerard@awful.systemsOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agobayesian epistemology for sure
minus-squareColl@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·2 months agoWell naive bayesianism, as practiced by the rationalists. Bayesianism itself can be reformed to get rid of most its problems, though I’ve yet to see a good solution for the absent-minded driver problem.
Ok so if hubris somehow becomes a synonym of bayes I’d be all for it
bayesian epistemology for sure
Well naive bayesianism, as practiced by the rationalists. Bayesianism itself can be reformed to get rid of most its problems, though I’ve yet to see a good solution for the absent-minded driver problem.