• gdog05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    197
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s still the option that it was a faked death. That much wealth and power, if it could be done, that’s who and when it would be done. I’m not giving it much credence without more evidence, but I’ve got no reason to think that it’s not possible given the series of absurd happenings that morning.

      • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Is there any reason to believe it wasn’t hacked? If I’m murdered then my account being accessed doesn’t prove I’m secretly alive. Especially if I used insecure passwords like Epstein is reported to have done.

        It’s not impossible, but if he was still alive I find it hard to believe he’d just access it once and never again. Stupid billionaires with bad passwords probably happens all the time and we just don’t know about it because they’re not at the center of an international child sex exploitation crime ring.

        • Mirshe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          See, this is my take as well - other people knew/guessed his passwords and used his account that way. Keeping him alive really doesn’t do anything for the “it’s all a coverup” story, especially when a LOT of his associates and contacts are getting tangled up in this release of his files. Additionally, this guy was talking so openly about manipulating markets, sex crimes, and all sorts of legal and quasi legal shit that I find it hard to imagine that EVEN IF he was connected to Israeli intelligence like has been suggested, EVEN IF he got spirited out of prison and away to Tel Aviv, I find it hard to imagine Mossad would want to keep such a DEEPLY compromised asset alive instead of driving him into the Negev and putting two bullets in the back of his head.

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          ·
          2 days ago

          Trump’s Twitter password was maga or something like that. After it got hacked I’m pretty sure it was maga2020 when it got hacked again

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That someone was exposed as a teenage “hacker”.

        I used quotes because it was more social engineering and lying than any sort of hack.

        • 3abas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          “hacker”… According to Epic, someone changed their handle to Epstein’s handle that was exposed in the files. There was no hacking involved.

          I would absolutely believe it that he was walked out and flown to Israel where he lives as a hero of the pedo-genocide state, but his brother who identified his body is vocal about evidence it wasn’t a suicide. I’m not sure what incentive he’d have to both lie about identifying his brother’s body and making so much noise about it being a murder…

          • 0x0@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            his brother who identified his body is vocal about evidence it wasn’t a suicide.

            He was killed! He’s dead, but killed! Dead, you see? Dead. Don’t go looking for him.

          • JustinTheGM@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’ve been hearing that the “changed handle” thing isn’t valid, because when an account handle is changed you can still see the original on the user’s profile (and that wasn’t the case for the littlestjeff account). With all the misinformation flying around, I have no idea about the accuracy of this though.

            • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah, it seems implausible to me that such a gaping security hole would be in a hugely popular game that long, but I guess that’s also not impossible. Stupider things have happened.

              • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                it’s a very common security issue. it’s usually not a problem because deletions aren’t very common: usually accounts are just inactive, and it’s not a problem that really effects the company itself so there’s no really big reason to focus on fixing it

                i’m not arguing either way on this specific case; i’d not heard about it until right now… but it’s pretty plausible from a software and security standpoint

                • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Does it sound plausible from the perspective of a company that has probably at minimum thousands of accounts getting deleting or renamed per day? This seems like something that would have caused much bigger problems much earlier, just due to the number of people involved.

                  • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    imo still very plausible… the key thing is deleted… accounts are rarely deleted, especially when they contain purchases and things like fortnight accounts do. more often than not, they’re suspended or just inactive which means the public ID remains used

          • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m not sure what incentive he’d have to both lie about identifying his brother’s body and making so much noise about it being a murder…

            Remember that he was deeply involved in Epstein’s businesses, including holding the position of president over the J Epstein & Co investment firm.

            • 3abas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Then if he went far enough to lie about identifying the body, it would serve him to not make a lot of noise about there being a big government conspiracy around it…

              • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                True, assuming this is rational behavior. People can do some pretty crazy things out of hubris or pressure though.

                I’m not going to definitively state that Jeffery isn’t dead. It really is most plausible that he died that night. I just, wouldn’t be surprised if he showed up alive.

      • almost1337@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I read somewhere that it was somebody else who changed their username to match his, and not the same account. Can’t find a source for it either way though.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’m sure it was possible to swap Epstein out. I just don’t think there was the motivation for it

      No one wants Epstein alive. The rich and powerful want to bury their crimes, normal people want retribution. The only motivator I can imagine would be a deadman switch, but even if Epstein were smuggled out, the rich and powerful would have dismantled any blackmail Epstein had by now and finished the job

      I see no path that still has Epstein alive at this point

    • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      If I had that much money I know I would have a “Hail Mary” boobytrap that released a bunch of incriminating evidence in case of my death.

      That might be Ghislaine’s job.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Like when Andy Kaufman did an entire show at the Apollo with ‘his grandmother’ rocking back and forth in a chair off to one side, only to pull off the wig and it was Robin Williams (in his quietest role ever) all along?

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Man comedy has gone so downhill.

          Like there were the greats… Abbott, Costello…Kaufman, Belushi.

          Millennials got fucked again. Foxworthy. Dunham. Cable Guy. Eddie Murphy’s later years. What have you done for me lately, Eddie?

          We could’ve kept Chris Farley, but he had to die. And without him, David Spade is worthless.

    • cattywampas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not impossible, but I don’t see what advantage there would be to keeping him alive vs just getting rid of him entirely.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        A simple trade, destruction of evidence in exchange for his life. Mind you I’d still kill him regardless but I also wouldn’t make any deal with slime like that to begin with.

        • gdog05@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m guessing a guy like that who traded in relationships and secrets would be smart enough to set up a dead man drop in the event he goes quiet for too long. It keeps his life valuable.

          • Goodeye8@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            That would make sense if he wasn’t arrested, convicted, interrogated and with a mountain of evidence in the hands of the FBI. A dead drop isn’t going to keep you alive if the person who wants you silenced thinks you’re already spilling the beans.

            But even if that’s the case he’s alive until he clears the dead drop because he’d still be a loose end.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            That too. Really it would depend how stupid he and his handlers were/are, I can’t really make any statements on stupid or smart rich assholes are though since I come from a place of assuming everyone of these profligates are universally just above braindead.

      • fizzle@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Who knows.

        Like someone else said there might have been a dead man’s switch ready to release all the kompromat.

        Death is obviously very final, if he’s stashed somewhere then you could wheel him out to testify although I can’t really think of a circumstance where that would be advantageous.

        I tend to think murder is the far simpler objective and therefore the most likely.

    • ronl2k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s still the option that it was a faked death.

      I love watching credible conspiracy theories turn into pure garbage conspiracy theories right before my eyes in one thread.