• foxwolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 hours ago

    As someone who drafts for a living, these drawings are shit and provide absolutely no useful information. This looks like a drawing from a project manager they did on the back if a napkin at lunch which they’d then bring to me and ask me to make actual useful drawing of.

  • DivineDev@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    God I’m such an idiot, I always thought gravity pulled rockets downwards and you need to apply thrust to take off, but it’s the other way around! You run the engines to stay on the ground and board the rocket, then just switch them off to start!

    And the recursive raptor engine that contains itself three times, genius!

    • dmention7@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I think the really visionary point is that the crew goes inside the engine.

      All these fucking nerd engineers have been putting the crew outside the engine for decades, to the point that some even put the crew on the opposite end of the rocket!

    • Varcour@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Well, you see the gravity thing only works for the lower third of the rocket. Then gravity changes direction, that’s why you need the engines to create thrust

    • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      I genuinely thought this was someone upset someone had said it was at first. Then the absolute gap in understanding that made that person think someone might actually mistake the picture for one.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The text is just the output of a “make an insightful LinkedIn post about the power of generative ai”

  • fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 day ago

    I kinda wonder what this person thinks people with jobs actually do all day.

    Just kinda goof around, make doodles in your sketch book, you know… engineer stuff.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 day ago

      Legit yes. AI boosters really think that.

      They think programmers just type stuff. They think engineers just draw stuff. Mechanics just turn wrenches till stuff works again.

      It’s because these people don’t know shit about fuck. That’s why they think everyone’s job can be done by AI. After all, AI can doodle and type and turn wrenches. Unlike their job, which is complex and nuanced.

      • fizzle@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Unlike their job, which is complex and nuanced.

        I don’t think the person who wrote this does anything technical for a living. I think their job is some BS training shit show “we will teach you how to write prompts for LLMs” or something.

    • Not a newt@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Oh shit, at first I thought the person in the screenshot was mocking the AI’s product, but they actually believe it’s a good result?!

      • fizzle@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Yeah. Their their grift is teaching people how to write prompts apparently.

  • Æ@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    Aerodynamic drag helps accelerate the rocket up. Got it. And the rocket takes its own oxygen with it, and sucks methane from the air and space. I didnt realise gravity changes direction from top to bottom, then goes sideways (obviously the methane alters gravity). And great idea having the crew compartment in the combustion chamber… must stop the crew from getting cold.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes a lot of modern engines run on methane. It doesn’t have to be as cold as H2 and its much more volume-dense.

      Combustion is much less complicated than with kerosene and other big hydrocarbons.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yep, they went to the moon on fuel that could also run a truck (if you don’t particularly care about still running it next week)

          • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Sure, the burning part isn’t the problem.

            Diesel has small amounts of lubricants, and those are very much needed for all the tiny little moving parts in fuel injectors and probably even in the engine itself. RP-1 doesn’t have those.

            Also, I know jet fuel will absolutely destroy just about every rubber not specifically designed for it, and that may apply to RP-1 as well.

            Also, starting your rocket fuel car in winter is probably going to be a real chore, since the vaporization point is much higher, and modern cars don’t come with preheaters that can handle that anymore (thanks to those fuel injectors).