Gork@sopuli.xyz to The Epstein Files@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agoEFTA00705860 🤮🤮🤮sopuli.xyzimagemessage-square102linkfedilinkarrow-up1726arrow-down13
arrow-up1723arrow-down1imageEFTA00705860 🤮🤮🤮sopuli.xyzGork@sopuli.xyz to The Epstein Files@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 days agomessage-square102linkfedilink
minus-squareJ92@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up62·8 days agoIt should be made known to the administration, that any time a redaction like this occurs, the public should and does imagine the sender to be Donald Trumpedo.
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·8 days agoThen he’s successfully protecting his owners.
minus-squareboonhet@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·8 days agoThat was way too coherent for Trump. No, this sender should be revealed. It may not be Trump at all, but whoever it is should be investigated thoroughly.
minus-squareBlackDragon@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 days agoNah, honestly at this point I’m done. Feed whoever wrote this email into a woodchipper. We’re past normal shit at this point.
minus-squareSailorMoss@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 days agoThe more productive thing for the public to think is “Who is going to prison for contempt of congress for this redaction?”.
It should be made known to the administration, that any time a redaction like this occurs, the public should and does imagine the sender to be Donald Trumpedo.
Then he’s successfully protecting his owners.
That was way too coherent for Trump.
No, this sender should be revealed. It may not be Trump at all, but whoever it is should be investigated thoroughly.
Nah, honestly at this point I’m done. Feed whoever wrote this email into a woodchipper. We’re past normal shit at this point.
Fair
The more productive thing for the public to think is “Who is going to prison for contempt of congress for this redaction?”.