Go to my original post and point to where I said anything about letting anyone off. Actually said it. Not didn’t respond the way that you apparently need people to respond to make you comfortable.
You didn’t recently come here via Reddit by chance, did you? Because this is absolutely the most Reddit coded response I’ve seen lately.
When a simple statement gets attacked for not including EVERY possibility for an “um akshually” guy. ::orbital eye roll::
Were you truly not able to deduce that if I made the statement about PREDATORY MEN who used Grok that this included the PREDATORY MEN who enabled that use by Grok as well?
Because “yes that’s bad too” is only the opposite of that in YOUR head, buddy.
I’m not dumbing down how I write and I expect a modicum of intelligence and discernment to elicit anything more than derision on my part. Especially accusations like yours so massage your holier-than-thou attitude.
So just let me know how much help you need understanding simple statements of fact next time before you get yourself all hot and bothered.
That goes for the morons who apparently agreed with this guy.
Sure, and that’s bad too.
But Elon isn’t making those pervs do pervy things. He’s just making it easier.
If being a producer of child pornography earns a “sure, that’s bad too” I’m going to just assume you are cool with the whole thing.
The person producing the child porn is infinitely worse.
You got lost buddy. “Sure that’s bad too” was referring to the makers of Grok.
I point of fact my first response was exactly about the predators using Grok.
Hope this helps.
Nope, I got it, I just am now realizing there is something very wrong with you.
You are letting the cp peddler off lighter than it’s users. That means that you are morally deficient. That is the point I was trying to make earlier.
Hope this helps.
Go to my original post and point to where I said anything about letting anyone off. Actually said it. Not didn’t respond the way that you apparently need people to respond to make you comfortable.
You didn’t recently come here via Reddit by chance, did you? Because this is absolutely the most Reddit coded response I’ve seen lately.
When a simple statement gets attacked for not including EVERY possibility for an “um akshually” guy. ::orbital eye roll::
Were you truly not able to deduce that if I made the statement about PREDATORY MEN who used Grok that this included the PREDATORY MEN who enabled that use by Grok as well?
Because “yes that’s bad too” is only the opposite of that in YOUR head, buddy.
I’m not dumbing down how I write and I expect a modicum of intelligence and discernment to elicit anything more than derision on my part. Especially accusations like yours so massage your holier-than-thou attitude.
So just let me know how much help you need understanding simple statements of fact next time before you get yourself all hot and bothered.
That goes for the morons who apparently agreed with this guy.
Jesus.
Ok, cool story.
Hmm, ok how about “six, seeeeven”?
That more your speed?
LMAO