This is basically the onion article : Teens Migrating From Facebook To Comments Section Of Slow-Motion Deer Video

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/52434607?scrollToComments=true

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1428372/kids-turned-the-comment-section-of-an-npr-podcast-into-a-group-chat-blocked-from-other-s

Transcript

Ira Glass: Dave Blanchard runs the public radio show Wild Card. And one of the less exciting and, in fact, rather tedious parts of his job is that he has to keep an eye on the comments that people post about the show online. And one day last fall on Spotify, he saw all this activity about this episode they did with the writer Elizabeth Gilbert. And Dave thought, oh, her book was controversial. It must have struck a nerve, this episode. And then he looked at the comments.

Dave Blanchard: And it was just, like, gibberish. There was a bunch of new comments, but I couldn’t make heads or tail of any of them. They’re just these clipped, weird, incoherent postings that I was just like-- it screamed bots, just because anytime that I see just gibberish in a comment on the internet, I assume it’s a bot. But the fact that they were all from different accounts seemed very weird. And the fact that they also maybe seemed to be interacting in some way also seemed weird and not like typical bot behavior.

Ira Glass: Can I ask you to read some of those comments?

Dave Blanchard: So yeah, I’ve got some from a later batch. We’ve got some where it’s like, someone says, “Ah, OK, M-H.” And two people have hearted that. Someone says, “Gilgamesh quit and I’m crying.” “Last Friday I broke up with my GF.” “Your cats are so cute.” “You’re gorgeous in that dress. OML, pink heart.”

Ira Glass: So OK, bots, he thought, some newfangled kind of bots that respond to each other somehow. He deleted the posts.

Dave Blanchard: And I went back to the Spotify comments again. And there was a new comment that said, uh, so it deleted my com. And that felt not botty. That felt very strange that a bot would be able to recognize that the thread got deleted and post it, letting people know that it had been deleted.

Ira Glass: And then there were other responses to that.

Dave Blanchard: So someone says, username cotton/amity, parentheses, I’m back, bitches, commented, “Weird.” Aubrey commented, “That’s weirdss,” two S’s.

Ira Glass: This is really not looking like any bot behavior he’d ever seen. So he goes to NPR’s Slack channels, post some screenshots, describes what these comments are. And one of the higher-ups, Matilde, suggests reporting it to Spotify, which Dave does. And then somebody younger at NPR reads the thread. They’re 10 years younger than Dave-- Gen Z, not millennial, named Hannah Chinn.

Hannah Chinn: And I click into the screenshots, and almost immediately I’m like, oh. My conclusion is really, really different than Dave’s and Matilde’s, because I’m like, these are kids. And I think that part of that is because I was a middle schooler on the internet, posting on forums and stuff.

And so I look at their display names. Their display names are, like, Ella with five emojis. And they’re the special character emojis. They’re the ones that you have to go onto the internet and type your name into a special text generator, and then it comes out as a special character, and then you have to special paste it into your profile.

Ira Glass: Their profile pictures are all cartoon characters Hannah’s never seen before. And then there’s the way that they’re commenting back and forth with each other, short little phrases. I’m sorry. That’s weird. Lots of hi’s, lots of extra exclamation points. Hannah recognized it. They grew up in a conservative home, was homeschooled, with limited access to social media.

Hannah Chinn: And so I was a kid who used weird parts of the internet not as they were originally designed to talk to my friends. I talked back and forth with my friends on Google Docs. And we would type things and then delete them, and then type things and then make them invisible by making the text white on the white background. So I think this is familiar behavior to me.

Ira Glass: So Hannah writes out a comment to post on Slack, shows it to their housemate before posting because they’re worried about coming off maybe too harsh with these much higher-ranking, older NPR bosses who Hannah had never met in person.

Hannah Chinn: And I say, OK, maybe I’m wrong, but I think these are just kids hanging out and we shouldn’t report them as bots. My guess is that they’re just using Spotify comment threads as their group chat, maybe because other apps on their phones are blocked. Who knows? And they happen to have chosen a wild card episode to do it, LOL. These are middle schoolers.

Ira Glass: Middle schoolers specifically, not high schoolers?

Hannah Chinn: Yeah, these are people who are new to chatting with each other on the internet and in real life. They’re kids who are excited to talk to other people on the internet. The goal is just to connect with people. You have nothing to talk about. You don’t know each other very well. You’re just seeing each other and acknowledging each other’s presence in the chat.

Ira Glass: Dave reads Hannah’s Slack message. And, well, he is not convinced. He posts–

Dave Blanchard: That’s an interesting theory.

Ira Glass: Yeah, that’s an interesting theory. There’s an exclamation point at the end of it, at least to give it that much credit.

Dave Blanchard: Yes. Admittedly, I was still like, really? Again, this is Wild Card with Rachel Martin on NPR-- not our target demo to have a bunch of middle schoolers in our comment section. It just felt so completely implausible that these people would have found this particular episode as their place to chat.

Hannah Chinn: Dave is like, oh, that’s an interesting theory. And I, at this point-- sorry, Dave. I don’t know you in real life. I’m a little bit annoyed. Because I’m like, I know that I said “maybe I’m wrong,” but I was so sure that I was right.

Ira Glass: Hannah does more digging, which makes them even more convinced than before. What the kids seemed to be doing was one kid would create a playlist on Spotify with a name like “Let’s chat here.” And inside that playlist would be one podcast episode.

And you know how you can see other people’s playlists on Spotify if they make them public? Other kids would see that playlist. They’d see the episode. And then they would go to the podcast episode and start posting in the comments.

Hannah got back on Slack and pointed out that the kids were using a playlist that was named New Chat. The kids had also posted a Google Form with some kind of quiz on it and said, “Fill this out. Only cool people can fill this out.”

Hannah Chinn: Bots don’t really spam Google Forms in my experience, whereas Gen Alpha might use them in the same way that my generation would use uQuiz or the BuzzFeed Make Your Own Personality Quiz feature.

Ira Glass: And reading that was the turning point for Dave.

Dave Blanchard: When they were like, this is something that I did, that’s what unlocked it. I think it was so implausible to me. And then when Hannah was like, no, I did this, I was like, oh, wow. I guess it makes sense.

And then it was like, I could go back and look at it again. And it was like, I had the lens on to see it. And I was like, oh, my god, they are kids. In retrospect, it looks so obvious.

Ira Glass: So how exactly did those commenters end up in the comment section of an NPR podcast? What exactly happened here? Well, we reached out to a bunch of the commenters. Only one of them agreed to talk to us.

As suspected, she is not a bot. She’s a 14-year-old girl who talked to me from the car with her parents’ permission and her dad at the wheel. Her name is Ella. When I asked her to describe herself, she said this.

Ella: I would say that I’m definitely a bit hard to get to know because I don’t know a lot about myself yet. But I think if you do get to know me, you’ll find out I’m a pretty cool person.

Ira Glass: Ella says this all started with a video podcast that played TikTok videos. Ella thinks a kid started it. The video seemed to be chosen specifically for kids who weren’t allowed on TikTok, but were allowed on Spotify. That was Ella. She was allowed on Spotify, but on no social media. And she and the other kids would watch this girl’s podcast on Spotify and then chat in the comments of the podcast.

Ella: And her podcast ended up getting banned. And we wanted to keep talking to each other, so people would make playlists.

Ira Glass: She described exactly the system that Hannah figured out. Kids would name their playlist “chat here” or something like that, and then there’d be some podcast, and everybody would go to that podcast and talk in the comments. She says it was maybe 20 kids in the core group-- lots of theater kids, she says, mostly girls, most of them with strict parents who didn’t let them on regular social media.

Ira Glass: And can I ask, why did you guys pick NPR shows to be the ones where you went to in the comments?

Ella: I think we just looked for podcasts that didn’t have many comments.

Ira Glass: I see. So you picked NPR because it didn’t seem very popular.

Ella: Yeah, so that we wouldn’t get caught up in other people’s comments.

Ira Glass: I tell you, buddy, I do a public radio show, and that hurts a little to hear it.

Ella: [CHUCKLES] Sorry.

Ira Glass: That’s OK. Are your parents NPR listeners?

Ella: Yeah, my mom is. She listens to podcasts all the time.

Ira Glass: Was any of this that your parents were NPR listeners, and this felt like this is the perfect cover? Like, if they catch you doing this, you can be like, look, I’m just doing this for an NPR show.

Ella: Yeah.

Ira Glass: Is that true? Did you think about that?

Ella: Yeah, a little bit.

Ira Glass: It’s funny. There was this guy named Dave who works for NPR, and he’s in his 30s. And he saw the comments that you guys were doing. And they made no sense to him at all. He really had no idea what they were. And he thought you guys were all bots.

Ella: Yeah. Some of them were really young, like 11 years old and stuff. So some of them definitely were a little bit not good at talking English that well. Or using slang.

Ira Glass: I got to say, I thought that was a very generous answer. Dave thought they were bots. And she was like, yeah, well, some of us kind of talked like bots. Ella told me she’s sure someday she’ll be clueless like Dave is now, which, of course, isn’t much comfort if you’re Dave. Dave says that once he understood that it was kids writing all those comments, it didn’t feel great.

Dave Blanchard: One, I felt bad for having reported them. I definitely felt guilty. And two, old. I just felt very old, very dumb, very out of touch. I literally needed Hannah to be my generational translator. It was such a clarifying realization of my age and obsolescence.

  • goodboyjojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    That’s very creative way to bypass school restrictions. The laptops in school are usually heavily monitored by software by the school

    • hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 hours ago

      That requires specific knowledge and skill that they haven’t needed up to this point. Maybe it’ll come with time.

      The irc days were great.

    • lakemalcom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Kids are fairly locked down on their school computers. Connecting to an irc server via some random URL is almost certainly blocked.

      If they aren’t on school computers then they probably have a phone anyway

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It would be trully spectacular if the age validation and social media restrictions laws yielded a rebirth of 90s-style Internet (which was vastly superior and yay more decentralized than the hypercomercialized grift-central bot-riddled shit we have now)

  • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Kids are ingenious.

    I had a Dreamcast when they released but my parents didn’t want me to have the web browser disk in my room (I was a teenager).

    I noticed that some menus in some online games look suspiciously like a web page. As it turns out some of the online games shipped with a lite version of the browser which was used for account maintenance stuff (I think it was an MMO, e: Phantasy Star Online a commenter pointed out below, but it’s been a while) but you couldn’t access the address bar so it seemed like it wasn’t very useful.

    I eventually discoveted that if you found the Help -> About screen with the lite browser open there was a link to the official forums.

    On the official forums, I searched the comments until I found a Google link and once I had a Google search bar, I didn’t need the address bar anymore.

    I only used these powers for good. (I was a teenager)

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I only used these powers for good. (I was a teenager)

      First time I’ve seen that specific spelling of “porn”.

    • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      14 hours ago

      my parents used to take the mouse away sometimes when they would leave me alone in the house. Turns out windows has a function where you can use the numpad to replicate the mouse called “mousekeys”. I also only used this power for good

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      In high school we had the old imacs running macOS 9. Some accounts had the web browser icons removed for the crime of observing tits on a CRT. Those guys figured out if you open PowerPoint you can abuse it into opening Internet explorer for you, no need for at ease’s cooperation.

      Simpler times with similarly motivated teenagers.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        We were little shits in high school, I have lots of these.

        There was a time (Windows 98ish?) where you could just type a URL into the Explorer window (the thing that opened when you clicked My Computer) and it would transform into Internet Explorer.

        We used Word and ran VBscript statements in the ‘immediate’ window. They completely ignored a lot of group policy restrictions around launching other applications.

        Network discovery was disabled, but if you knew the machine’s name then you could connect to shares directly via the UNC path.

        Cisco donated 20 PCs to our school to teach their CCNA course. The course only used the lab about an hour a day so that lab was empty most of the time and at the end of a hallway that nobody had reason to walk down. My last 2 years of high school we loaded those PCs down with games (Starcraft, Total Annihilation, Unreal Tournament, Worms, Diablo 2) and we would skip class and use our lunch time to LAN party in the cisco lab.

        We were almost busted once when one of the guys used ‘the tricks’ in the Library to run Unreal Tournament off of our lab’s network share on several of the ‘Internet computers’ which, for obvious reasons, faced the libearians desk. Everyone played dumb so they didn’t know WHO did it, but we (the MTG nerd group) were questioned and sacrificed a blank CD-R with “Unreal Tournament” written on it to appease the librarians.

        Teachers, by procedure, stored their grades in spreadsheets on floppy disks on their teacher PC. Well, if you know the PC name (which was just the ‘room number-teach’) you could access the drives on the PC via adminstrative shares (//server/A$). That kept us from having attendance issues at least (🤫)

        We had a 120GB (a lot at the time) file server where we’d pool the fruits of our piracy and all 20 PCs had fast Lite-on CD-RW drives so we were all selling burned CDs. We couldn’t do DVDs but movies on piracy sites were often xvid encoded tuned to be just small enough to fit on a CD-R (650MB, I think).

        So anyway, I went into cybersecurity

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      (I think it was an MMO, but it’s been a while)

      I bet it was phantasy star online (2?)

      • excess0680@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The original. I played the GameCube version. There was a separate menu in the game that let you setup the Internet connection in order to play online.

        I do remember being able to access the web browser through some tricky steps when setting up the billing. There wasn’t an address bar anywhere on the UI by default but some combination of forward/back revealed it. Not all websites were supported on this stripped-down browser but it was fascinating.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, that sounds about right. It was neat to have an MMO on a console but paying a subscription wasn’t in the cards… the disc was pretty useful.

  • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Many years ago my nephew showed me how they were using a googe docs live collaboration as a “chat” with their school chromebooks.

    Hopefully this will turn them more computer savvy.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They’re still doing that. Along with doodling apps. Draw text or use text boxes. Source: my kid logged in to their school acct on my computer and didn’t log out. I get to see what’s going on.

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Children, today we are going to learn about i2p and ramble. Make your pubescent brains everyone’s problem again, per tradition.

  • iatenine@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    ·
    21 hours ago

    To be clear, this is a good thing:

    New generation’s should be finding creative solutions to building a community rather than inheriting one controlled by a 40 year old billionaire with every incentive to continue manipulating their behavior in ways that don’t align with their self interest

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Hacking shit (in the original meaning of the word: “making something do what it wasn’t originally meant to do”) is how us older folk started going down the path of making Tech (not to be confused with mindless Tech followers) in the first place.

      You see a similar learning effect with modding.

    • jdr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Idk about you personally, but I reckon most people here who were online in the 2000s were doing so mostly without supervision. It didn’t take much skill to avoid filters, shoulder-surfers, upstream blocks. We weren’t geniuses to do that either. All the smart kids I meet figure out what’s to access the raw web without permission or filters. It didn’t stop us, and it won’t stop them.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Also the kids who figure it out will tell other kids how to do it, if only for the kudos and brag factor.

        Unlike in the “walled garden” shit that the Internet has turned into nowadays, in the non-digital world and original internet people just talk to each other without the surveillance, content bots or algorithmic experience shapers.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        18 hours ago

        One thing is that in early days they hadn’t really sorted out the full potential of manipulating online interactions yet. So we got to enjoy connection with relatively less active manipulation.

    • EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yeah personally I’m kind of, like, impressed. I keep hearing that kids these days are so used to frictionless devices that they have no problem-solving skills whatsoever when it comes to tech, but, today’s kids actually aren’t that different than yesterday’s.

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        There were just as many kids yesterday that can’t handle tech issues as there are today.

        I can only think that people that believe differently clearly don’t work on any sort of technical support roles at places with a variety of worker ages. When you see the gamut of retirement age employees down to 18 year olds and everyone is calling for simple things all the time, the age stuff is a bit ridiculous.

        • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yep, the only difference is the speed people can understand and follow instructions, which goes down with age. But technical affinity is not age related.

        • egregiousRac@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I think it’s just that it isn’t as obvious that they will be clueless. It used to be that you had people that used tech and/or the internet and people who didn’t. Now you have people who have been online for a decade+ but have never gone more than two clicks from Facebook/Discord/etc. They are really no different from the no-computerites two generations ago and the no-internetites last generation.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Agreed, there are a ton of options out there for social media that aren’t algorithmically-weighted.

      They could even make their own page easily on Neocities.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It really is amazing that given how long humans have been around that so many of the older ones have yet to learn that the one thing that will for sure make the younger ones want to do something, and find creative ways to do it, is to try and prevent them from doing it.

    Hell, it is not even necessarily just young people. Look at the lengths prisoners go to in an effort to get around jailhouse restrictions.

    Nothing makes people willing to find a way to do something like telling them they “can’t do it”. Spite is a powerful motivator.

    • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The motivations of kids are generally pretty obvious - most parents know exactly what it is their kids are wanting to do. And kids will work to accomplish that motivation despite what roadblocks the parents put in place, and at somepoint they will figure out a strategy to remain undetected.

      Parents don’t really get a vote WRT their kids having sex or doing drugs. They get _some influence over the details of how those occur, if they show they can be trusted to not freak out.

  • rozodru@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    reminds me when I built a star wars themed website in the mid to late 90s on Geocities and I wanted a forum but I didn’t know how to make a php forum (nor had I anywhere to host it) so I found this defunct Star Wars forum and kinda just hijacked it and linked to it from my site and made threads on there.

    Kids are smart. they’ll find a work around for just about anything. Age verification doesn’t work except when it comes to the companies that thirst for the data it provides.

    • cybervseas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      100
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Clearly we need to age verification even harder, how dare those children try and form social connections /s

      I gotta say keeping away from those for profit big tech algorithmic nightmares and finding small semi private places to connect, this might be a kludgy but effective compromise.

      • kibblebits@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Someone just needs to start a social network that doesn’t ask for age and doesn’t become profitable ;)

          • kibblebits@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Too bad Lemmy if full of propaganda, asshole moderators, and politically motivated instances.

            Maybe there will be a post-post-social network. No one from USA Russia or China.

            Bliss.

            • TronBronson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              19 hours ago

              The mods let you get away with murder on here for the most part… is propaganda just stuff you disagree with generally?

                • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  34 minutes ago

                  I guess I just don’t see much propaganda as I see tired regurgitated positions, and shit opinions. Its a narrow information sphere with a political bias, but propaganda ridden is not how i’d describe it. Leftist echo chamber maybe.

              • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                Ironically your instance lemmy.world is one of the instances more tighthly controlled to stay on message with the United States political view, with even one of its bigger forum moderators there being openly a Zionist and is source of a ton of pro-Liberal (US-style Liberal rather than more leftwing interpretations of it such as Social Democracy) messaging (still today a lot of people go around hammering the “Kamala would’ve been better” key on the Genocide even though she was openly an unwavering supporter of Israel plus in a World scale of politics she’s barelly to the left of Trump mainly differing in that Trump wants Fascism at home and abroad whilst she wants the Fascism to stay abroad).

                Hell, back when I had a lemmy.world account one of the admins even leaked my registration e-mail to Israel and I started getting “learn about Israel” e-mails on it IN MY NATIVE LANGUAGE.

                Not that I disagree with you when it comes to most lemmy instances, it’s just that lemmy.world along with the tankie instances is very much “shaped” and controlled, though in a more “modern western propaganda” style rather than the heavy handed ban hammer way favored by the tankies.

                I can totally understand how the previous poster reached their conclusion about Lemmy even if I disagree that it applies to Lemmy in general.

                • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  40 minutes ago

                  I hold people who hold that opinion personally responsible for the additional deaths across the middle east, the audacity to look at all this unneeded death and say oh ya it was would have been just as bad either way… i truly hope its guilt causing that cognitive dissonance man.

                • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  41 minutes ago

                  Kamala would have done nothing to aid in the genocide. I’ll give you that much, that much is fair. You’ve got blinders on a lot of death and destruction that would not have happened if it wasnt for that trash opinion.

                • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  43 minutes ago

                  Wow dude if you think Kamala would have been worse on Gaza you gotta be smoking fucking CRACK. Everything else you said completely ignored. Kamala had no intention on invading iran and throwing half the middle east into death and chaos. Like she cantsupport isreal and not get us into a war. this is the dumbest shit ive read on here. Kamala would have undoubtedly been better. It would have been the status quo of the biden admin, not a fucking regional conflict. She wouldnt have had isreal marching her around on an old republican grudge match thats for sure. Your telling me either you think kamala would have invaded iran, or that iran escalation is unrelated to the genocide. Which one before i put you on a block list for that commically stupid opinion.

            • femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              23 hours ago

              That’s going to be everywhere now that fascism is on the rise and people just being themselves is political.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Certainly better than the big blinking sign that says, Hey, pedes, the children are all right here like at Club Penguin and Roblox.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    23 hours ago

    In sum, kids couldn’t use tiktok or other apps because the parents blocked them, but could use Spotify. After a kid’s podcast was blocked, they wanted to keep the conversation going so they created playlists called “chat here” that linked to podcasts with few comments (to avoid real comments getting mixed up).

    My thought was mostly that I used MSN, ICQ and AIM back when I was their age… why aren’t chat services like that not an option? Oh right, I guess that’d be WhatsApp or Discord in 2026, which is also kinda dubious.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Oh I’m aware, I meant analogous software. I don’t think AIM or ICQ are still functioning, are they? Although a quick check suggests ICQ both shutdown and somehow isn’t, so I have no idea. Lol

        • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          ICQ went tits up not so long ago. I tried getting access to my old account but couldn’t. It was operated by a Russian company in the end which also had some other chat service. The users got rolled into that one.

        • cybervseas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Matrix would be the way to go now, in terms of a chat which doesn’t require a phone number or age verification.

          • taiyang@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I don’t see kids adopting that but I know me and my friends in middle school probably would have. We were a nerdy bunch…

        • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I feel like app based messaging would be problematic because just putting the app on the phone or computer would be an issue for locked down phones.

        • EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          20 hours ago

          AIM is gone, I was actually there when the servers shut down! Signal or telegram I think would be the closest to an AIM-like experience, but I’ve never seen or heard of any children using them.

          • PokerChips@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            In the eleven years I’ve been on signal, I’ve only been able to successfully get 4 people to consistently use signal. I’m the only person they talk to. One person may have stuck around and got his friends on it but I don’t communicate with him much to know.

            I was able to get a group chat at a place I worked at. But from what I can tell, none of them are you using it anymore. I don’t get it. The most simple and secure app in the world and nobody gives a shit.

            • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              I actually got everyone i know to using signal, because i am simply not reachable by other messengers. That made these people use signal to chat with each other, which in turn made parts of their friend network join - it was interesting to see the “network effect” occurring on a small scale.

            • EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I think Telegram is a lot more popular overseas? although for all I know you are overseas from me LOL