WE DEMAND A CORRECTION TO uh various minor nitpicks

also we swear we totally didn’t get your email

bonus from thread:

I am having a lot of fun on Manifold, but if the team insists on inviting eugenics speakers to conferences, its probably time for me to leave :-/

What exactly is your objection to people exercising their bodily autonomy to implement voluntary eugenics?

    • flere-imsaho@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      she’s literally paid from an EA grant for the work at vox, so she can hardly compromise her journalistic ethics more.

      • deborah@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There really is a difference in professional ethics guidelines, though. Matt Levine used to work at Goldman, he totally always sides with financialization, and for that matter everyone at Bloomberg is paid by Mike Bloomberg, but they still have professional guidelines preventing them from most trading.

        ETA: lol. lmao, even

        A Vox spokesperson declined to comment on whether the company has an ethics policy in place around reporters betting on sports they cover.

      • deborah@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        But betting? There’s being an insider and then there’s profiting, and aren’t most journalists prohibited from trading or betting on their covered areas?

        • Evinceo@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Aren’t prediction markets an attempt to turn insider trading into a productive part of society (or whatever the libertarians who love prediction markets conceptualize as society.)