“With membership at new lows and no electoral wins to their name, it’s time for the Greens to ditch the malignant narcissist who’s presided over its decline.”

  • nednobbins@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Is she really responsible for the problems of the US Green party?

    As near as I can tell the EU Green parties had a different trajectory. They initially started winning seats in parliaments on purely environmental platforms. Those MPs actually started pushing green agendas in various parliaments. That, in turn led to more people voting for them. Eventually that had to adopt policy positions beyond the environment and they tended to be pretty left.

    The US never had Green party members in a position where they could actually do anything useful about the environment. That means they could never fulfill their primary goal in the US. So when they tried to branch out the same way the EU Green parties did, they just turned into a vague hodgepodge of leftists ideas.

    Is there any suggestion that Jill Stein’s replacement would have any chance of saving the US Green party?

    • geekwithsoul@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The issue is she sucks all the oxygen out of the room with her pointless presidential runs and does nothing for the four years in between. There’s an inconsequential number of Greens who run and win elections in small cities and towns or less consequential elections, and none of them have won any federal elections. A real party leader would recruit and foster candidates in large cities and state legislatures— and then get folks to run for the US House, the Senate, state governorships, and then the presidency.

      Stein is less a party leader and more a figurehead who basically seems to be in it for the grift. And so US Greens (especially in comparison to those in the EU) are less a party and more just a convenient label for those of a certain bent that want to run as something other than as a Democrat.

      • nednobbins@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        My question was more along the lines of the “(not so) the great (wo)man” hypothesis.

        Let’s imagine that Jill Stein was permanently abducted by aliens. What do we think would happen?

        Would the Green Party just collapse?
        Would the former member just join the Democrats?
        Would they start a new party?
        Or maybe someone new would take over who could do a better job?
        I think we’d likely just get someone who’s functionally equivalent.

        • geekwithsoul@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Ah, I get your question now. Unfortunately I think it’s impossible to say, but I do know it’s impossible to find out while she’s still there.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I am by inclination Green, but I live in Europe where the Greens have been through their scandals and emerged somewhat presentable. I don’t believe that is the case in the US, where the Greens and particularly Jill Stein are basically just useful idiots. They disrupt the candidates most aligned to their own cause. And in Stein’s case, she’s disrupts her own damned country.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    And Stein’s answer every single time this comes up?

    “What about Gaza?”

    She is literally an operative for Russia and the Republicans. This isn’t even a meme or conspiracy theory, it’s simply a plain truth.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m voting for the party for socialism and liberation and you can too.

    You don’t need to vote green to cast a third party ballot.

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 minutes ago

        No, I didn’t say that.

        My ballot will be counted for PSL.

        That’s the opposite of not voting.

        You know… voting.

    • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      24 minutes ago

      will be voting for the PSL if they’re on the ballot in my state, Claudia De la Cruz is great. if they don’t make it on the ballot then it’ll probably go to Stein as I believe she’s confirmed on the ballot in my state, but the PSL is my first choice!

      edit: just checked, the PSL is indeed on the ballot in my state, so they’ve got my vote :3

    • geekwithsoul@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Cool. Not sure I’ve seen anyone arguing against that point.

      And of course you’ve been working all the time for the past four years in support of socialism and liberation? Because of course, you wouldn’t be one of the people who only jump in every four years with a third party vote because they think it makes them edgy and cool? That would just be sad.

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        27 minutes ago

        A lot of the tone of these anti green posts seems pointed at pushing people to vote for the democrats instead. I’m as anti Green Party as they come, but I want to make sure people know there are still good third parties to support.

        As a member of the lemmy instance for privacy and open source, I’m not gonna dox myself, but yeah, I’m absolutely politically active in the off years lol.

        You wouldn’t happen to be trying to badjacket people or gatekeep support for PSL, would you? Because first timers and those newly disillusioned with the democrats are welcome to vote for PSL. No experience required.

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Even if you assume she isn’t a bad faith actor, she’s still objectively failed to pass the one thing the world needs, the Green New Deal, and environmentalism is in the worst shape it’s been in decades.

    That’s not all her fault, but her protest candidacy weirdness put Trump in office the first time instead of spending that time and effort on actual policy so…

    Fuck off already?

    • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Haha oh really. It had nothing to do with Hilary being the worst candidate ever? The authoritarian electoral college founded to preserve slavery? The rampant voter suppression by Republicans that Democrats refuse to stop. It was all her fault huh?

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        All her fault, no, but if she was a real progressive she would have learned a lesson and made a play for a lower office. But it’s very clear that’s not what she’s being paid to do.

      • Scirocco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Certainly if she has been trying to effect real change in a realistic way, rather than an egocentric impossible run at the presidency…

        Things would have been different. She was one of many straws, which if subtracted, would have prevented trump

        So for that and that alone, she and the rest of the greens can fuck right off.

        See the No Labels folks for a more common sense way to be activist on national level politics.

        Greens would be great if they would focus on good, winnable races from the bottom up…

        What that called again?? Uhh ‘grass roots’

        • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          She funded an investigations that showed Hilary had won a state that went to Donald Trump. But sure it’s her that doesn’t care about democracy not the Democrats that rolled over on not one but two elections where they likely won.

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Jill Stein is both a terrible candidate and possibly a Russian agent. Even if I do align with much of the green parties stances and I live in a solidly blue state, I would never vote for her out of principle

    • Scirocco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Indeed. I might vote for some Greens down-ballot, but Stein is a stain on the party and its cause

    • DTFpanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      then you are effectively falling right in line with the lies the DNC sold you since the “russian agent” theory is easily debunked after 5 seconds of googling.

  • a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Jill Stein doesn’t know how many members of the House there are in Congress. 600?!?!

    There is a 100% chance that Trump couldn’t name how many members there are in the house. I’d be shocked if he could list the branches of government without help.

    note I’m not saying that’s acceptable. But if that’s your test for “is this a serious candidate” I hate to be the bearer of bad news…

  • DTFpanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Shitlibs love to be parrots for the DNC, eating up whatever shit they spew out their asses to stay in power. Yeah, the green party and Stein are the baddies, not the genocidal, warmongering democrats who don’t give a shit about Americans 🙄

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’d love for this person to highlight even one thing outside of running for president every few years, that Jill Stein has done to forward climate activism or help stop the endless wars.

  • Strike1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    “given that she herself has received tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Google, Lockheed Martin, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, and McKinsey.” I don’t see this information on the FEC website. Can anybody actually find this information? I sort this page by Amount, and it doesn’t list these companies. It lists people:

    https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/?data_type=processed&committee_id=C00505800&committee_id=C00581199&two_year_transaction_period=2016

  • RalphFurley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    They never organize, canvass, campaign… they never put in the work. It’s easy to sit on Twitter all day and disparage the Democratic Party (yes they have many flaws as well) and nothing else.

    They’re lazy grifters.

    What exactly did Jill Stein do with that $7 million for the recount? She was interviewed by Mehdi Hassan and he kept asking her why she won’t call out Putin when she has no problem calling out Bibi. Yes two things can be true at once. She just couldn’t explain why she refused to call Putin out on his war mongering and genocide.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      12 hours ago

      How does the Green Party suddenly get money around election time when they don’t do shit for the previous four years?

      People are asking.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        How does the Green Party suddenly get money around election time

        That’s - clearly - when they’re doing their best work for their supporter. You thought the ‘green’ wasn’t about greenbacks?

  • Don Escobar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I only hear about this candidate a month before the election for the last 50 years, how is this mummy still here?

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      84
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Pretending they had a chance in a voting system that can barely support two parties was kinda pitiable. Until we have RCV for federal elections at a minimum, they will never have a shot.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is a little discussed problem with fptp (along with many others) it gives minor parties perverse incentive to play spoiler, which gives foreign actors an opportunity to find spoilers.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        A-fucking-men.

        The Green Party should be the RCV party and that should be their main focus. After that then they and any other party would actually stand a chance. Republicans are actively banning RCV from being implemented and Democrats are slow walking it, but we need to keep pushing.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 hours ago

          That would mean actually caring about running campaigns for state goverments. State governments are the ones that can (and in Alaska’s case have) implement RCV.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 day ago

          TBH, I don’t see it happening except organically from within the Democratic Party. If enough progressive Democrats get elected, I think it stands a chance to happen in our lifetimes.

            • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              Unless they gain more support from endorsing RCV than they would lose to third parties. They’re slowly bending to long term third party pressure.

            • socsa@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              1 day ago

              This is just not true. Places which are doing RCV are literally state at metro democratic strongholds. Democrats are literally the only ones pushing it.

              • blazera@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                1 day ago

                Vested interest meaning it benefits them, i doubt you disagree with the current system of only two parties being considered for elections improves the odds of those two parties winning elections

                • jj4211@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Actually, an RCV system may help the democrats, at least in the short term.

                  For the last couple of decades, the “spoiler” candidates generally take from the democrats more than the republicans. Last big spoiler third party that screwed the right was Perot that I remember. With RCV, then the ‘fringe’ votes can still be cast and democrats can work toward being the second choice of those hardliners. At least in the short term, it alleviates the need to actually compete for votes with candidates that are going to lose anyway.

                  Longer term, it may cause a viable third party or more to get some steam (attracting practical candidates that no longer see the need to be a D or R to get votes, the parties generally getting left alone by outside forces that find them not worth weaponizing), but I don’t think the politicians are too concerned on that long a time frame.

                • Telorand@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  What I disagree with is your implication that they will only ever act in their own interests. I do not know that to be true in the future (and neither do you), as not everyone is motivated by money or power. Enough politicians who see it as vital to the health of US democracy, and change will happen.

                  I’m not proposing that it will, only that it is far from a precluded possibility. As Boomers die out and retire, I have hope for the Millennials and Gen Zers who replace them.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            That’s all well and good, but useless in any federal race because the federal government does not dictate how the elections/voting are done.

            Brings it back around to if you care so damn much, then focus your resources on state governments.

            • blazera@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              You should reread the elections clause. Congress has authority to regulate elections

      • Omega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They have a shot, by joining the Democratic Party. The same way that progressives join liberals, make their voice heard, and let the voters decide.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Or, just here me out, the Democrats adopt ranked choice voting from the Green Party platform, ditch aid to Israel, and make Jill Stein obsolete. I know, I know, it’s crazy. But, it might just work.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Or just hear me out, the green party stops playing spoiler every 4 years. Proving that their platform is meaningless and empty. And instead focuses on running and recruiting for state and local legislature to actually pass ranked Choice voting. And where it makes sense, such as offices no Democrat is running for. Recruit and endorsed a candidate to run as the combined democrat/green party candidate. Instead of constantly splitting the vote helping conservatives and the bourgeoisie.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I guess we’re never getting ranked choice voting then. And the genocide will continue until morale improves, according to bourgeois liberals.