And it runs in windows too!

“Did that pause screen ad make you want to quit using YouTube?”

“Yes, but what alternative is there?”

“Success!”

The question is whether the dislike of the character was because it was poorly written or poorly acted.

In this case I feel like Charlie was a well-written character who had a good arc (despite a touch of Mary Sue-itis) but Anne Winters’ delivery was absolutely flat.

While I like your analysis, the comment you’re responding to was referring to Pulaski’s arc, not Charlie’s.

we will go the way of Europe, where the native-born populations are being utterly displaced by third world migrants and Muslims

Hey, you God damned ignorant racist, why are those “third world migrants” trying to get into Western countries? Could it be because our countries have been portrayed as places of hope for the downtrodden, where anyone willing to work hard can make a life for themselves? Or maybe it’s because their lives are fucked due to Western countries fucking the Middle East and Central America for all of the 20th century?

Nah, it must be a plot by the “globalists” to “replace” “whiteness”!

Brazil is not banning the Internet.

Brazil is revoking the permission of a company to do business in Brazil because it refuses to follow Brazilian law and is openly defying a court order.

God, you techno-feudalists are fucking weird.

GOP judge declaring NHTSA unconstitutional in 3… 2… 1…

A YouTube representative confirmed that the practice will now become commonplace “as we’ve seen both strong advertiser and strong viewer response.”

Anyone else get the idea that these two “responses” were vastly different?

Conservatives already love abusing children; why should their voting base be safe?

don’t think that’s their goal at all.

Literally their goal.

As mentioned (via Tom Warren) by [Playstation co-CEO Hermen] Hulst in the interview, Sony wants to tempt PC players to purchase and play sequels to single-player narrative games on a PlayStation console.

Oh, so you’re not actually interested in the facts, you just want to stomp your feet and blame Biden.

Gotcha.

My opinion doesn’t matter.

The union and the railroad thought it was reasonable.

The union and the railroad reached an agreement they both found acceptable.

The IBEW and BNSF Railway reached an agreement April 20 to grant members four short-notice, paid sick days, with the ability to also convert up to three personal days to sick days.

They asked for seven sick days, they got four plus three convertible personal days for an annual total of seven. That’s a reasonable compromise.

So to recap this sequence of events:

You’re mad at Biden because:

1. A bill that Congress passed preventing railroad workers from going on strike, because it put the good of the nation ahead of the good of the railroad workers.

2. Biden continuing to negotiate with the railroad unions for months afterwards.

3. The White House and the railroad unions agreeing to a compromise.

4. The unions voting to approve that compromise.

That about sum it up?

So you’re not mad at Biden for continuing to work with the Union to get a deal both sides would find acceptable, you’re really mad at the union for voting to accept that particular deal?

Except they did get those permanent improvements.

Source.

Even Biden sided with the railroad corpo’s over the union.

Yes, because at that time further supply chain disruptions would have been disastrous for Americans.

And what happened after that? The White House continued to work with the Union until they reached an acceptable compromise.

The economy didn’t take another hit, the union is happy, and Internet commenters can cry “Corpo Biden!” with no included context as to what happened.

The billionaire who inherited millions from his dad and lived in a gold-plated penthouse in NYC and has been sued multiple times for not paying his contract work really understands the plight of the working man, you know?

1. She
2. Is a non-white
3. Democrat.

Take your pick