Good question. Also, given the way AI tools are creeping into everything, can we really declare that any modern Photoshop are truly free of AI?
- 0 Posts
- 362 Comments
Everybody is just trying to look cool. Everybody probably looks like a “poser” to someone else. And in a cruel twist of irony, the inventors and early adopters of some “cool” new thing, look derivative and boring years AFTER everyone else has done it. Kids don’t have a long memory for these kinds of things; they grew up in a world where it was already old news and boring, never having experienced a world without it. This shift in perception can happen sometimes even among people old enough to have been there at the beginning. So yeah, they are just a bunch of posers trying to look cool, but aren’t we all?
Is the joke that Stranger Things is nothing like Twin Peaks at all?
Wolf314159@startrek.websiteto
Work Reform@lemmy.world•Just checking in to see if anyone cares that the mumbling turtle is still on full salary while being MIA for two-and-a-half months
2·2 days agoNevermind that regardless of any other factor the absence alone for such a long time means that the ethical thing to do would be for him to resign.
Wolf314159@startrek.websiteto
DeGoogle Yourself@lemmy.ml•Here is another reason Google is terrible.
78·3 days agoEveryone should just report the error to Google over and over and over again. Remind them that the federal government doesn’t actually have unilateral authority to rename major international geographic features on the whim of a single deranged despot.
Wolf314159@startrek.websiteto
Soulslike - Discussion, News, Memes@lemmy.zip•[ER] Horse armor then and now
2·3 days ago2026 looks like a good way to impale yourself.
Wolf314159@startrek.websiteto
TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.world•That magnificent hair!
14·3 days agoI was referring to that glorious hair.
Wolf314159@startrek.websiteto
TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name@lemmy.world•That magnificent hair!
24·3 days agoThe light that burns twice as bright burns half as long, and you have burned so very very brightly. Look at you. You’re the prodigal son. You’re quite a prize!
Not all the colors of crayons are available in the RGB space. Some colors will always look different when captured for a digital photo.
Wolf314159@startrek.websiteto
LEGO@lemmy.world•[META] Whatever happened to images like these..? (notes in post)English
1·4 days agoAround 20-30 years ago, people took a little more care in composing a photo, even the amateurs. Hard drive space was still kind of pricey. Smart phones weren’t ubiquitous yet. It took some level of real investment to create the kind of photos you miss. Lego landscapes are hard. They’re tiny and big at the same time. Focus, depth of field, and lack of a background all work against you in ways a little diorama doesn’t. Combine that with more people that haven’t actually studied the craft of photography, taking more photos than ever and you get flooded with snapshots. Those lazy snapshots still happened 20-30 years ago to be sure, but nobody’s remembering them because they were forgettable then and forgotten now, kind of a survivorship bias. The same reason people argue that the music they listened to in grade school always was and forever will be the best music.
Wolf314159@startrek.websiteto
Technology@lemmy.world•As Ubuntu embraces AI, Debian discusses banning all AI-generated codeEnglish
13·4 days agodeleted by creator
I wish I could stay asleep for 8 consecutive hours, or even go back to sleep after waking up at hour 6 without feeling like shit the rest of the day. Some of my most restorative sleeping has been 4 hours or a 30 minute nap. Sleeping more than 30 minutes and less than 4? Straight to sleepy jail. More than 4 hours, but a little less than six? Sleepy jail. More than 8 hours? Probably dead, definitely at least sleepy jail where nothing productive happens.
Wolf314159@startrek.websiteto
Technology@lemmy.world•As Ubuntu embraces AI, Debian discusses banning all AI-generated codeEnglish
41·4 days agoThat’s not what the articles says or implies at all. The article only refers to another article with a click bait headline. The article article summarizes Canonical stance like this:
- Canonical will add AI to Ubuntu — but only cautiously and when it truly makes sense.
- AI features must be mature, open-source, and run locally when possible.
- Focus AI on accessibility (speech-to-text, TTS) and improvements, not turning Ubuntu into an ‘AI product’.
And to be clear, including a tool or default workflow is MILES away from patronizingly forcing it on to users. It’s just the way that most distros that aren’t Linux From Scratch work.
The idea is to have the server safely shutdown BEFORE it loses power, so that BIOS setting wouldn’t mean anything. The server does not loose power while it it running, so it will never “restore last state after AC loss”. The idea is that you can run a low power device (the raspberry pi) for which you don’t care if power is cut abruptly and that can talk to both the UPS and the wake-on-lan of the server directly over ethernet. It being local means those WOL are much more likely to work than trying to send them from outside your network when you’re remote. It’s a lot simpler to set this up once than it is to recover a server with a corrupted file system due to power loss or lose access to your server for weeks because a thunderstorm knocked out power for 30min at the beginning of a long trip. That pi can also take care of other always on services like a pi-hole, home assistant, etc.
Wolf314159@startrek.websiteto
History Memes@piefed.social•No unicorns were harmed in our research during the creation of this meme.English
1·5 days agoThis is hardly an inciteful comment worthy of discussion. We could say this about just about anything people like.
We are, collectively, stupid apes who go apeshit for lazy insults that make us feel superior to other stupid apes.
It’s a nothing burger of a comment, but it sure does drive engagement. It’s also not really true and neither is your hot take. Humans being fascinated by strange things is like one of the core aspects of our species, our civilization, and our science. To me that hardly seems an indication of stupidity or something to be shamed for.
It’s my understanding that he didn’t put himself at risk for the adrenaline, he did it because he valued the safety of the animals he cared for above his own. I seem to remember him explaining his reasoning on his show. There are lots of devices and drugs that can be used for protected contact so that animal handlers are never put at serious risk, but all of them can and do sometimes go horribly wrong for the animals in addition to being very traumatic in ways that it can be difficult for humans to conceive. He didn’t do it without thought either, it being clear that the techniques he used required an intimate knowledge of those animals and their behaviors. He didn’t die wrestling a croc or handling a venomous snake. He died from being to close to an animal he likely had much less familiarity with.
Tastes like a beaver’s ass.
Wolf314159@startrek.websiteto
History Memes@piefed.social•"We don't like your kind around here"English
19·10 days agoIs that Pierce Brosnan?
Wolf314159@startrek.websiteto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•The water wars have started, and it's not between countries, it's between neighborhoods and data centers.
3·11 days agoPaolo Bacigalupi is to the climate crisis what William Gibson is to cyberpunk. Stories like The Water Knife and The Tamarisk Hunter feeling a lot closer to reality everyday. But then again, fighting over access to water is a tale as old as time.





“No participant study has been run yet, so we’re not claiming superiority ahead of the evidence,” he said.
Why not? Seems a simple thing to do before the development gets very far, certainly before the “press release” stage. Probably because they have actually done participant studies and found that trippy map visualizations aren’t particularly good for info at a glance or safe for use while driving. The whole design should have been driven by participant studies from the beginning.
The whole article wreaks of a “solution” in search of investors and a problem. No one needs a near street level view for navigation, they’ve got that already. Adding a layer of Escher-like distortion seems unlikely to make getting information at a glance from a map any better.