Sure, assuming slight criticism/questioning of something means I am completely opposed to anything and everything even slightly related is normal these days.

But trying to justify a teacher being doused in gasoline for having a high salary in is another level of disgusting.

The violent people being there just for the violence, not caring about the stated goals is what I wanted to point out.

As for hating the bad teachers, I agree and realized this when writing my comment. Still, I find it hard to believe all current teachers are bad or that the protesters know which are the bad ones to attack.

And as pointed out already, attacking teachers definitely does not make teaching an attractive career choice. So it’s likely counterproductive even if the attacked teacher was one of the “bad ones”.

Plus, how bad of a teacher would you have to be to justify a violent attack?

Protester that are complaining about low salaries for teachers are attacking… teachers?

Something does not add up here.

Decagram is used in centeal europe for cooking and groceries, but otherwise probably unused.

I am technically trained in CPR. You absolutely shouldn’t rely on my CPR skills if there is another choice. Wrangling a deranged person is difficult even for people with ample training and experience (e.g. cops), let alone for flight crew with very basic training. If the person is not a danger to himself or others, there is no reason they would escalate the situation during flight.

Restraining him is almost definitely not something the flight crew should attempt. Flight crew are not trained for this and could get injured. It could also easily escalate the situation and the last thing you want is a fight on board while in air. That could cause danger to the plane or other passengers. Asking him to stop and detaining him after landing would probably be the protocol.

There is no reason they need to detain you to charge you.

Both the article and this comment chain are about what caused the missle strike on a school, not what caused the wider war. Commenting edgy off-topic political statements is neither smart nor helping anyone. It’s just obnoxious. Please either stick to the topic or refrain from commenting here. Thank you.

Yes and no. Obviously carelessness can be a problem regardless of whether you use AI. But banning a tool that is known to hallucinate from being involved in life and death decisions is an improvement, even if it does not solve everything.

Sure, tell yourself that as nothing of real significance actually changes. The Democrats passed better legislation.

deleted by creator

People have been electing democrats on and off for over a century. Yet it changed nothing. But sure, 3rd party voting is the thing that can’t succeed. Doing the same thing again and again hoping for a different outcome is clearly the smarter thing to do.

But sure, if we just accept genocide and vote for it, at least the gas will be cheaper. Sure. Why not.

Take your strawman argument somewhere else. I never said or implied I was talking only about the presidential elections. You can vote for 3rd party president, sentaor, and congressman in the same election. Also for state and local 3rd party candidates.

And of course the DOGE fearmongering. Oh no, we can’t vote for change because of DOGE cuts! Sure, countless poeple are dying because of lack of healthcare, pollution, homlessness, … But we can’t try to do anything about that, because we will die of DOGE cuts! /s

The elections are not a one time event. Yes, more people may suffer for 4 years, but if it builds momentum for an actually good 3rd party or at least reforming the DNC, it could have been worth it. But stupidly painting anyone who wants something better then just a Democrat win as an enemy that supports Trump ensures it can’t happen. It’s not that there are no rails to the third track. It’s that people like the author of the meme actively rips them out with the “voting 3rd party is a waste of vote” bullshit. If you ask me, voting for more politically correct genocide is a waste of vote. If you are choosing for the lesser of two genocides, you are alredy fucked either way.

No excuse for people who don’t vote at all tho.

Also filing legal subpeonas for a marketing campaign could get the involved lawyers fined and disbarred. Judges don’t appreciate their time and taxpayer money being wasted like this.

So the same bullying that always happens is now visible and that’s the core problem people see. The glasses, not the bullies wearing them or the bullying recorded. Watch teachers and schools fight the recording, that make evidence fall right into their laps, so they can go back to ignoring bullying in their schools and then act shocked when serious fights, or worse happen.

Oh, no sir! LOL This is America. That’s not 25 calories, that’s .25 caliber!

Well, what Agent641 left out is that manufacturers in the US are allowed to “round down” to 0 if the calories/amount per serving are below a certain threshold. So by claiming 1,532 serving, they can get away with saying the calories in each serving are tiny and write 0. Tick-tack uses this to claim 0 calories even though the are mainly sugar, simply by claiming a portion is 1 tick-tack. It’s just another ridiculous US regulation no one wants to fix.

Well, I was a bit surprised by the carbon footprint of nuclear after I went and did some research on this. The emissions from nuclear fuel mining and preparation are about 34g CO2e/kWh.^{[1](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652613007981)} So less than what the article estimates for Frances grid, but not by much. I wonder if they only estimate the fuel or if the building costs are not significant over the plants lifetime.

deleted by creator