So the same bullying that always happens is now visible and that’s the core problem people see. The glasses, not the bullies wearing them or the bullying recorded. Watch teachers and schools fight the recording, that make evidence fall right into their laps, so they can go back to ignoring bullying in their schools and then act shocked when serious fights, or worse happen.
Oh, no sir! LOL This is America. That’s not 25 calories, that’s .25 caliber!
Well, what Agent641 left out is that manufacturers in the US are allowed to “round down” to 0 if the calories/amount per serving are below a certain threshold. So by claiming 1,532 serving, they can get away with saying the calories in each serving are tiny and write 0. Tick-tack uses this to claim 0 calories even though the are mainly sugar, simply by claiming a portion is 1 tick-tack. It’s just another ridiculous US regulation no one wants to fix.
Well, I was a bit surprised by the carbon footprint of nuclear after I went and did some research on this. The emissions from nuclear fuel mining and preparation are about 34g CO2e/kWh.[1](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959652613007981) So less than what the article estimates for Frances grid, but not by much. I wonder if they only estimate the fuel or if the building costs are not significant over the plants lifetime.
deleted by creator
Yes, but also, it is sad you can automatically safely assume a news site that we only want to display our news will be handling a fuck-ton of our personal information. If it just showed the news and non-targeted ads, it wouldn’t need a retrofit. GDPR wouldn’t apply.
So is the value for other countries. I get 25 when legal minimum is 20. You are fighting for the lowest standards.
Well, if in the foundation you include the moderators/admins or whatever they call them on wikipedia, then I agree. But just like on reddit, the mods of wikipedia are also part of the issue (not all but most).
Oh, you want to make the black pieces into the aggressors of the battle?! I see what you are!
Well, it is what it says on the label. Sure, you may have enough knowledge to understand it is impossible, but some people being able to spot a scam doesn’t make it less of a scam. And it doesn’t mean the people who don’t know that much about how youtube works and get scammed should be unable to sue.
I already wrote no one is demanding they remove all ads. But they can’t describe premium as “removes all ads”.
No one reasonable will demand I sell them the statue of liberty. I can’t do that. But I am still not allowed to advertise that I have Statue of Liberty for sale. The issue isn’t youtube not removing these ads. The issue is they claimed they would for premium.
I don’t think anyone want youtube to remove the ads. They just want Youtube to advertise honestly. If it can’t remove all ads, don’t advertise completely ad-free videos.
What in the world are you talking about? The rent only paying for the interest? You know buildings are not eternal, right? They depreciate in value. They have maintenance costs. And a hundred other things a good landlord should be taking care of.
Well, while USA failed, there are many countries where the combination of democracy and capitalism succeeded to various degrees. Not ever perfect, but way better than anything else tried.
Just capture the testing procedure and you capture the government. That is the typical flow of “allow only X to run for office”.
Honestly, calling people like this Capitalists is like likening all communists to Stalin. The idea of capitalism is based on competition. If you are eroding competition, you are eroding capitalism.
But Marx tells us (in Das Kapital ) that the capitalist will always be seek to bypass regulations and ultimately capture the regulating government.
I am assuming he neglected to mention that the same type of people will seek to capture the government in any system. Socialist, communist, capitalist, feudal, doesn’t matter.
The means they use to capture the government are different. To intention is the same.
Would you say issue of murders increasing to record numbers are unrelated because some murders are commited with a knife, some with an axe? The mechanism doesn’t matter, the abuse it allows does.
Is what everyone in the US thought as well few years back. Now you have a person in jail for speaking up against cop city and police officers routinely stalking their wifes/girlfriends/exes via flock or phone geolocation. Not like few cases news are outraged about. Thousands of known cases. In one state that demanded police disclose their geolocation requests with reason, comparing numbers disclosed with number of request, 2/3 were undisclosed. Even though it was a legal requirement. So the system was probably abused to violate peoples rights more often than it was used to actually investigate crimes.
Plus, even if you are not the one whose speech is suppressed, or who is spied on by your deranged ex, political speech being suppressed still hurts you by getting more bullshit laws passed.
Now if you don’t care about that, I guess there is no helping it, but I can’t think of a political issue more worth caring about than this.
Also filing legal subpeonas for a marketing campaign could get the involved lawyers fined and disbarred. Judges don’t appreciate their time and taxpayer money being wasted like this.