you would actually need to contribute to receive, and you couldnt just move money around contributing nothing

    • DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’d argue that’s a debt-based transaction. You get the land now, but the payment is deferred to a later time when you have the means to pay it.

    • root@lemmy.wtfOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      but the builder takes only 50 grain sacks to build me my house and since you cant stop him with overwhelming beaurocracy, were building affordable housing

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Seems like a major hassle for the builder to have to lug home 50 sacks of grain, which they’ll then have to try and barter for something else. If only we had an abstract representation of value that’s portable and universally accepted…