• Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Because politicians shouldn’t be getting private charter, they can take normal commercial flights like everyone else.

    There’s extremely very few cases where a premier of a province, whose job is mostly for local provincial stuff and meeting with local stakeholders, needs a plane to go places, let alone a private charter.

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I disagree, depending on circumstances. I having a team of people that also need to come along would make logistics easier on a chartered plane

      • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Did you read the article? For the same “circumstances” the less important people would fly commercial but he’d still charter a plane for him and a few others.

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yes I did, and there are some examples where aids flew by commercial plane, its important to know who the 5 or 6 other people on the chartered flights were. I do agree that some of these flights were not necessary, I’d argue that some of them are. All in all, this was 140k. Less than 1 penny per population in ontario, for a full year. He has done much more egregious things that are clearly fraudulent.

          • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Hmmm. I’m trying to understand where you’re coming from and why you’d assume that they were necessary or legitimate? I think it’s fair to say that it’s purely an assumption and giving benefit of the doubt right now.

            The article itself mentions that this is a new development. So he’s managed to be in his position for several years, but now there’s a legitimate use of chartered flights?

            Other premiers seem to use commercial majority of the time unless they travel to remote areas in the north (not to Calgary or DC like Doug).

            https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/premiers-private-flights-commercial-9.7171284

            Even his statements/reasoning in the use of chartered planes is that he’s a laughingstock if he uses commercial.

            https://www.thetrillium.ca/news/politics/doug-ford-says-north-american-leaders-think-its-a-joke-ontarios-premier-doesnt-have-a-private-jet-12377919

            arguing that other North American leaders “think it’s a joke” that Ontario doesn’t have a dedicated government jet.

            Ford has defended the purchase and his use of private and charter flights as premier, saying he’s saved taxpayers “millions of dollars” by flying commercial over the years.

            So his argument is that he’s already saved Ontario residents millions and now wants comfort?

            • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Very much a benefit of the doubt right now. Again I hate Ford and he’s been a horrible premiere. He’s purchase of the jet was something he should be removed from office for. I could see it potentially being needed for a very time sensitive situation.

              At the end of the day having more details about what he needed the chartered flight for would be helpful