Could they do it? Deactivate Windows licenses, block Cloud services, access to Office 365 and whatnot?

    • sir_pronoun@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      That, yes, and maybe Microsoft wouldn’t be the one pulling the trigger? I mean, with prism the NSA had access to most internet traffic between the US and the rest of the world, I think. Who knows what mechanisms there are in place, and what this government might decide to do?

  • vvilld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    6 days ago

    Microsoft has the ability to do this if they really wanted to. It would completely destroy their business if they did, though, so they won’t. I mean, who would keep using Microsoft products if the company was willing to just take it away from you at a moment’s notice?

    The US government cannot do it so easily. They’d have to order Microsoft to do so. Microsoft would resist and take it to court. The US Court system makes a LOT of really fucked up rulings, but the one thing they do reliably is side with big business. I’m inclined to think that in this hypothetical showdown, the courts would side with Microsoft.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not like loads of militaries care.
        They either use Linux (probably not BSD (or maybe they do?!) or outdated af Windows NT/XP/embedded 7/Server versions.
        I’d honestly not expect them to at least use Windows 10 IoT or an embedded modern version.

        I mean our banks still used Windows 7 or Server 2012 for their ATMs.
        And they are network connected lol

      • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m sure that if a government has information that’s so sensitive they’ll store it on servers that run some sort of proprietary OS, or maybe not digitally at all.

      • Ziggurat@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Isn’t it even part of US law? And why big organization request their data to be hosted in their country?.

        I thought this was far more than just Snowden

  • MTK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yes but not legally. They are also legally bound to EU laws, which would protect the clients that bpught the software. But! Just like plenty of companies pulled out of Russia, if the US does not care and decides ro enable this behavior then they could do it without too much trouble.

    But I doubt this would happen, the EU is a big part of their income, and money is what they care about.

  • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 days ago

    Microsoft is an Eldritch hydra monstrosity. I think it has become its own civilization. I think it’s so large that it just exists as a self sustaining chaos phenomena. I don’t think the organization can make a decision. One department of thousands makes a decision. And they all jostle about breaking each other’s shit every other day.

    https://youtu.be/Apq-U81i8kI

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yes, technically they could cause massive disruptions. Not likely they will.

    1. They would not get paid.

    2. Europe would suddenly have a very good reason to spend billions of euro on funding competitors.

    • lengau@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      To expand on point 2, Europe is already home to two major competitors to Windows (one headquartered within the EU) as well as competitors in other fields, so they would also have an easier time (as a bloc) than many other places, who don’t have local competitors I nearly as good a position.

        • lengau@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          The two I was specifically thinking about are SuSE and Canonical. There’s also Collabora and Nextcloud in the productivity systems space and plenty of others.

        • zxqwas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          LibreOffice, OpenOffice compete with the office suite. Google docs is American but is a big competition with the online variant of office.

          Linux and to some extent BSD compete with windows. Munich, Germany had a project to switch away from windows in favor of Linux. Or got cancelled after some other guy got elected, I don’t know the details.

          There are a dozen cloud storage competitors. But that is something Microsoft is not dominating the market at anyway.

          The government won’t care about gaming but the public opinion would turn against the xbox and windows, which would cause Sony and Nintendo to celebrate.

          • Samsy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Well Munich swiched back to Windows and a M$ dependence opened there short after, looks like deals where made.

            But good news anyway Schleswig-Holstein, the state near Hamburg, decided to switch completely to Linux.

  • peetabix@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Haven’t used a Microsoft product at home in years, at work though is a very different story. Everything is Microsoft and its horrible and frustrating.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 days ago

    Of course they could. One update could render the system worthless or come with malware that infests systems in the network.

      • atro_city@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yep. The idea that microsoft can “do nothing” to a system that isn’t hosted on their servers is pure delusion - or ignorant. They haven’t thought more deeply about being evil, which is quite cute actually.

    • parlaptie@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It hasn’t, though. They just ended support for older versions of Windows. You can still use those versions. The question being asked is if they can actually stop you from using Windows, to which the answer is most likely no.

  • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Stopping Windows from running, probably not. MS could stop sending updates and could deactivate it, but it would mostly keep running. And, if any EU/Russian systems were not connected to the internet (yes, this sort of thing still happens in 2025), nothing MS did would matter. Office/Azure and other cloud based services are more vulnerable. Yes, Microsoft could geo-fence those services such that they did nor work if you were coming from an IP address in EU/Russia. Though, the simple workaround for this is to install a VPN. And given US sanctions on Russia, this is probably happening right now anyway.

    As much as the tin-foil hat crowd likes to think about MS having some master control switch, it’s incredibly unlikely. The problem with backdoors is that hackers are constantly looking for ways to attack systems, especially Windows. If there was some sort of master “off switch” baked into the code, it’s likely some one would have stumbled upon it by now. Even if it’s that well hidden, it’s a “one use” item with high reputational damage attached. Stop and consider for a moment, what happens when that kill switch gets used? It’s going to be picked up on. People record internet traffic for fun. As soon as that kill command went out, security researchers, the world over, would be dissecting logs to find the command, and then it would be reversed engineered. That MS had such a kill switch in their codebase would cause massive distrust in MS software going forward. No one would want to take the risk of having that kill switch running in their environment, certainly not on anything critical. Also, given how bad people are at updating Windows, we’d probably see a lot of systems killed by hackers just doing hacker things. Since the versions with the kill code would be know, you’d get bored teenagers searching Shodan for vulnerable systems and sending the kill command for fun. And all of this would be “Microsoft’s fault” for having the backdoor. It would be a PR nightmare. And since everyone would now know what the kill command looked like, anyone who mattered would install filters to block it at the firewall. So, it got used once, caused some damage with a lot of damage to MS’s reputation but is now neutralized. Was it worth it? Probably not to Microsoft.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Without security updates it would quickly be a nightmare to use windows.

      Anyone remembers installing xp from a CD? It didn’t have security updates, and accepted all kind of trash right in from the internet right away by default lol.

    • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I mean, yes, but there are ways around it. Windows could have a public key embebed somewhere and the private counterpart gives access, the command could depend on the time it’s received, so it’s never the same and without the private key it’s impossible to reproduce, and the Killswitch could be non-instantaneous, combine all of that and you have a Killswitch that:

      • It’s very hard for you to realize something happened, because by the time it happens the trigger is lost in a sea of other requests
      • Even if you were to fine comb through all of that and spot it, it’s encrypted
      • Even if you were to resend it it would do nothing, because the time has changed
      • Even if you managed to find the public key and decrypt it the actual content could be inocuos, like a random looking string
      • As long as the private key is secure enough it would be impossible to crack
      • Even if you somehow managed to crack it and send anything you want to the PC you don’t know the protocol to generate the random strings and you only have the one example of the message (which no longer works)
      • Even if several people did this the content could truly be random (in the common sense of the word, i.e. pseudo-random), since Microsoft controls the RNG on Windows they can use that to ensure that random data gets generated equally

      And I’m not even a cryptographer, people who come up with new encryption protocols can surely do a lot better than my naive example above which would make it almost impossible for someone to figure out.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago
    1. They can deactivate cloud services likely on a press of a button, for all EU IP addresses.
    2. If there’s a killswitch in Windows, yes. Otherwise they can still selectively put out an update that would lock up your PC and disable it from functioning, possibly even wiping any and all drives in the PC completely clean.

    The likelihood of this scenario is small outside of either the USA invading Europe, or Trump giving the EU to Russia or other powers, while Trump promising MS no taxes and regulations for a given period.