The two main issues I see are:

  • In any kind of anarchist system, the need for financial capital is replaced by a need for social capital. It’s easy to tell people “jUsT go TaLk To YoUr NeIgHbOrS” and hard for many people to do. There should be room in society still for people who don’t feel like talking

  • Locally grown and unprocessed foods with unpredictable taste and texture

If you see any more problems or solutions then you can comment them below

EDIT: I tried to delete this post but I don’t really know how. I deleted it but it still shows up. Sry for the bad post

EDIT 2: I guess I will undelete if it’s going to show up on the feed either way

  • cravl@slrpnk.net
    1·
    5 days ago

    Very well said. Concerning terminology, I did just think of neuronormative, or possibly neuromajoritive?

    Tbh, I feel like neurodiverse is the more problematic term, because diversity is a measure of a whole group, not individuals or even subgroups within it. Saying someone is more or less diverse than another is just… nonsense. They can contribute to or represent diversity, but they cannot be diverse.

    ^(You could argue that’s a nitpick and that language is defined by those who use it, but eh.)