• glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Your first complaint was that the game still isn’t complete, now your complaint is that they’re fraudsters for not delivering it on day 1.

    • Ledivin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      So, try and follow me here… if the game still doesnt have features promised at launch, then did it have those features on day 1?

      My complaint is the fraud, and always has been. Joking about how it still doesnt meet launch expectations is literally the same thing.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Can’t believe I’m wasting my time on this conversation but here’s a spreadsheet from 5 years ago showing what was promised, what was there at launch, and what was there when the list was made for reference.

        I haven’t played in a few years so I don’t know what’s changed (aside from unique ships) but that’s a pretty complete list. Sure it’s missing a few minor things but are you really going to pretend it fell so short of its goals?

        No, you’re not. That’s why you shifted to talking about the sad state of the game at launch…something no one is saying isn’t true.

        You changed the subject.

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          So you linked a spreadsheet that shows I’m correct, and use that to claim that I changed the subject and am shifting goalposts…

          If both of my claims are objectively true - based on the source that YOU provided - then did I change the subject or was I just adding additional context? It sure seems more like you’re avoiding the subject and attacking a strawman instead of the arguments I made.

            • Ledivin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Who’s moving goalposts, now? 😂🤣😂🤣

              It’s almost as if you realized you were wrong and decided to change the subject. Wild.

              • glimse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                So you were stewing on it for 22 hours, huh?

                We agree on the argument you shifted to - they barely delivered the game they promised on day 1. But that wasn’t what your first comment said. You said the game was starting to almost approach what they promised before launch.

                For at least 5 years, the game has been a few minor features away from everything they promised…while adding a ton more they didn’t promise. Do those missing features means the game isn’t at it’s promised state? You’d be pedantic to buy it would be understandable? Do those missing features means the game isn’t 99.99% complete? You’d be a fool to. And you were a fool.

                Feel free to get the last word in here.