• Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    So you linked a spreadsheet that shows I’m correct, and use that to claim that I changed the subject and am shifting goalposts…

    If both of my claims are objectively true - based on the source that YOU provided - then did I change the subject or was I just adding additional context? It sure seems more like you’re avoiding the subject and attacking a strawman instead of the arguments I made.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Who’s moving goalposts, now? 😂🤣😂🤣

        It’s almost as if you realized you were wrong and decided to change the subject. Wild.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          So you were stewing on it for 22 hours, huh?

          We agree on the argument you shifted to - they barely delivered the game they promised on day 1. But that wasn’t what your first comment said. You said the game was starting to almost approach what they promised before launch.

          For at least 5 years, the game has been a few minor features away from everything they promised…while adding a ton more they didn’t promise. Do those missing features means the game isn’t at it’s promised state? You’d be pedantic to buy it would be understandable? Do those missing features means the game isn’t 99.99% complete? You’d be a fool to. And you were a fool.

          Feel free to get the last word in here.