• AAA@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Maybe because the same people who are asking for sympathy now, are the people who hide their sympathy behind “it’s business” when it’s the other way round.

    Sympathy has to be earned.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yeah I remember seeing estimates where someone said 51,000 people were denied life saving care during his time as CEO. If there was no sympathy for their lives, why would people be sympathetic for his?

      Also when someone told me they shouldnt have shot him, they should have just punched him or something I asked if it should be 1 punch for all 51,000 lives… Because I have a feeling that 2 weeks later (a little over 14 hours I have been informed) when he’s done getting punched once per second I don’t think there would be much left of his corpse. The bullet is more “humane”

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    4 days ago

    Us middle aged fucks do too.

    And so do some of the older fucks. Even my dad, a literal boomer, said that it wasn’t like he killed someone useful.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      Boomer dad sold health insurance in the 90s, made some bank, almost every customer was a referral from another. Think on that.

      I can hear him from the afterlife, “FUCK that low life! I’d shoot him AGAIN!”

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Word. If someone is giving word of mouth to an insurance agent, they’re doing the job the right way. Gotta love people like that :)

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          My old man sold a policy to an old woman.

          “When will I be covered?”

          “You already are, the second you signed, like I said.”

          She slipped and broke her back in the bath, minutes after dad left. Covered. Done. Word spread like wildfire.

          Dad didn’t sell for one company, he sold for 20. He could tailor the contract to one’s situation, wasn’t beholden to one company’s product. He sold what was right for a given person.

          He later made bank from those same elderly people, converting their sorry CDs into annuities. Saved them loads of money, and made them more.

          Dad wasn’t always the most moral man, but goddamn he tried later in life. Still proud of his drunk ass.

          Sucks that such a position exists, but he did his best. (This was in the 90s.)

          EDIT: I should note, dad wouldn’t have shot the CEO. He hated guns. He would have beat him to death, mano a mano. He practiced karate for 30-years, and was a bouncer for much of that time. Because he liked to fight. Complicated man, complicated life.

          • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            I think I would have loved a chance to meet the guy. I’m an ex bouncer, martial artist too. And, like him, I enjoyed a good, fair fight, but didn’t mind the chance to cut loose when it came.

            We all have flaws for sure. Gods know I do lol. But your dad managed to help people and be someone his kid could love and admire. That right there is as good as it gets.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Didn’t meet him until I was 20. Coming from being adopted into my grandparent’s Beaver Clever family into dad’s, system shock. He was a wild guy, died too young, but he burned that candle at both ends.

    • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      You know, this is the part that really drives me nuts about this whole thing. A murderer murdered a murderer.

      Murderer A, he’s taken care of. The judicial system will put him in front of a jury, he will be tried. He will be found innocent or guilty. The system handles murderer A.

      Murderer B on the other hand, just screw the laws of humans for a moment, the laws of physics say that he shouldn’t be murdering any more after death, but nope. People are still dying. You would think this is where the system would kick in and start putting a stop to it but nope, corporation is still killing. Hell the meeting murderer B was headed to didn’t even get delayed.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        There’s no law of physics that says people will stop dying just because the person who caused them to die was killed. Thomas Midgely Jr. died in 1944, he’s still killing people. The wheels he put in motion still haven’t come to a stop.

        (he invented Tetra-ethyl lead and CFCs, he’s at least slightly damaged every living thing on the planet for a century)

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          I feel like his death was some kind of cosmic justice.

          I don’t believe in any kind of higher power, but he was crippled by his inventions, which caused him to design an elaborate cable system so he could zip line around his house instead of using a wheel chair.

          He got his neck caught in his zipline contraption and strangled himself getting out of bed.

          Not exactly justice for the billions of lines he’s negatively affected, but it is kind of funny that he kept inventing stuff that killed people, and he was in turn killed by his last invention.

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            There’s this hilarious line in his Wikpedia entry:

            Bill Bryson remarked that Midgley possessed “an instinct for the regrettable that was almost uncanny”.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    The headline doesn’t lie, but importantly:

    48% said they view the killing as totally or somewhat justified.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    Most of the population doesnt relate to some 1% fuck committing mass social murder? Strange, we’ll have to work overtime to uncover why this is.