• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        We let the few dominate and exploit the many. Our relationship with nature is refelective of our relationship with ourself.

        But the cultural focuson domination and exploitation is not biological. It’s not in our nature. The potential to dominate is. But so is the potential of cooperation and mutual aid.

        Let’s try to rethink our society and behaviour to nature and each other and aim for the latter. For all our sake.

        #GoogleBookchin

        • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Those billionaires didn’t portal into this world from another reality. Pick any human at random, make them a billionaire, chances are you have another worst-of-the-worst.

          I’d guess fewer than 1/3 of people are “good” (even after being educated). The rest are just dangerously intelligent animals.

          • OwOarchist@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            3 months ago

            Pick any human at random, make them a billionaire, chances are you have another worst-of-the-worst.

            Power corrupts. Our mistake is allowing power to be concentrated.

            • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Nobody’s perfect, but if I had a billion dollars my sole preoccupation would be to spend it as fast and effectively as possible to help people in need. That one criterion alone — a kind of minimum requirement — unfortunately makes me weird. However, I stand by the claim that anyone who would do otherwise is a bad person.

              To be clear, there is a wealth threshold (Maslow’s hierarchy of needs) that few people in the first world achieve, so we can hardly blame them for not donating their meager savings. But a billion dollars is utterly beyond the pale. Hence my example.

        • Vegafjord oakframer@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’ll admit that I am not clean, but I’ll also say that this is a consumerist framing which is benefitting might and machine. We are all sinners in one shape or another under the machine because we rely on the machine.

          We live under planned economies governed by the eternal hunger of the machine. They sell us shit on stick through advertisements, media control and machine collaboration.

          We loken these monstrocities through the dissolvement of the machine through making oppositional societies that by grounds embrace the meaningful, and being opposed to might and machine.

          • Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            How about you just try to minimise the hold the machine has on you instead of ranting poetically? And don’t start with the old ‘no ethical consumption under capitalism’ because you don’t need to actively make the world a worse place by choosing the most destructive means of consumption available to you.

            • Vegafjord oakframer@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Ranting poetically is how we change the world, mate. Its called getting the message accross instead of using language that only highly educated people understands.

            • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              it’s pretty easy to be *mostly vegetarian, being fully vegetarian is a lot harder for those who are used to eating meat.

              It’s an important distinction to make, we’re not going to convince people by being perfectionists, we convince people by actually helping them change their habits.

            • Vegafjord oakframer@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I tried to go vegan once. Didnt go well. Probably easy for you, but I couldnt do it. Probably sais something about how pathetic I am as a human being.

              Thanks, I feel like shit now.

    • pipi1234@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Slightly?

      As the dominant species we should take better care of the world.

      But, I guess shareholder value is more important.