I’d argue this isn’t internal US news considering an international reporter was shot. TWO international reporters shot in a single day.

Also…

“People came over to help and got me on the curb. A medic was called, who cut off my clothes. In my leg was what felt like a five centimeter hole with muscle hanging out of it and blood all down my leg. The medic put a tourniquet on it, and a journalist I was with took me to ER.”

  • mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Now imagine all these protesters marching toward the capital…

    gonna be a bloodshed with thousands of National Guard arresting people right?

    Right?

  • caboose2006@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Oh, he was “hit” with a bullet? It just accelerated through the air on its own and accidentally “hit” the journalist? Funny that.

    Say a journalist was shot by police you fucking cowards.

  • tvbusy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Less lethal round. There’s no guarantee of its usage being non-lethal, only less likely to be lethal when using correctly.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Precisely. There is no such thing as a “non lethal” round. I can’t believe the media has gotten so… God I hate to use this word but it’s the only one that works… cucked.

      • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        God I hate to use this word but it’s the only one that works… cucked.

        Owned is a great word for this. Nearly all our news outlets are owned by billionaires which leaves journalists next to zero ownership over what they are allowed to write and how they are allowed to frame things.

    • nthavoc@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Especially when dumbasses are using them and aim for the neck, face, and head at way too close range.

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    As instructed by their pig commanding officers to do. They want attention. They want to distract everyone away from the big beautiful bill.

  • propitiouspanda@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The rich people who stoke these animosities will pay.

    Their children are not going to inherit the world they think they will.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    251
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I’ll keep repeating this because I think it’s important

    Wear safety glasses

    Not sunglasses, or shades or prescription glasses

    Wear actual industrial rated workers safety glasses.

    If you get those shots in your face, you’re going to lose an eye or both eyes. Safety glasses are designed for this kind of stuff and they actually work. It will stop those projectiles from damaging your eyes.

    Cops all over the world are known to purposefully shoot people’s faces and heads. After the fact they will just argue that it didn’t happen, it was accidental, it was chaotic, it was dangerous, etc, etc … it won’t matter after the fact if you lose an eye or end up completely blind.

    Wear safety glasses, they’re easy to find and easy to use.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Excellent point.

      Furthermore, especially in the U.S, ballistic tactical eyewear is readily available at a ton of surpluses. Civilians have access to protective equipment that they should be taking advantage of.

      Paintballers and airsofters wear them all the time because the extra price for real-world protection is worthwhile when it comes to your vision and freakishly chaotic ballistics.

      Protests are a form of combat. Come dressed for the occasion.

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Paintballers and airsofters

        Great point … wear any paintball gear you might have

        And if you are targeted for wearing anything … what would you rather have? Be arrested for wearing gear - or lose your eyesight because you wore no gear.

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Better yet, safety glasses and a face shield.
      Both are required for using a grinder in an industrial setting.
      The safely glasses will save your eyes, the face shield will save your teeth and nose.

      Something like This should work well, but I’d still wear safety glasses behind it too

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        69
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        To add emphasis to this because I really worry about these young people, here’s something I wrote in another thread …

        Safety glasses … any time you join a protest these days … wear safety glasses … any kind will do because it will give you a fighting chance at saving your eyesight.

        So many protests over the past few years have featured police forces aiming munitions, tear gas and other projectiles at people’s faces on purpose. These projectiles won’t kill you but if they hit your face can severely wound you or destroy your eyes and blind you.

        Wounding people as opposed to killing people is also a psychological tool used by security forces. If they hurt, maim or even cause people to bleed … then it has a psychological toll on those who see it. An even greater psychological hit for anyone would be to see a healthy strong, vibrant young 20 year old man losing both his eyes and blinded while everyone witnesses it and tries to help. It might only directly hurt one person but the event would psychologically affect dozens or even a hundred people who see it.

        One of the saddest stories I ever saw was the story of 20 year old Gustavo Gatica in 2019 who was part of a protest against the government in Chile. Police were actively shooting at protesters’ faces on purpose blinding many people in one eye. Gustavo was hit in both eyes and was rendered completely blind.

        https://www.amnestyusa.org/gustavo-gatica/

        It’s one of the saddest and most infuriating images I’ve seen in a long time … no matter where you are and you want to join a protest … wear safety glasses and save your eyes. Police might not try to aim for your face but if they do, they’ll just make the excuse that you shouldn’t have been there in the first place and blame you for your injuries.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Just non-lethal rounds flying around all by themselves apparently. Nobody firing them I guess.

  • DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    TWO international reporters shot in a single day.

    Here I thought the article got the nationality of the reporter wrong only to find out they’re just aiming for reporters in general now apparently…

    • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I had the same reaction when I read about this dude too. Just “Are you fucking kidding me?”

      If this is what they’re doing to people with cameras on them and reporters around them… what are they doing to those who don’t?

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I’ve worked in construction and building for many years and from time to time I had to get safety training.

      Basically, any small object that is moving fast enough is dangerous. It’s not so bad if it hits your skin but it is absolutely dangerous if it flies anywhere on your head and face. You can lose eyes, teeth, hearing even have objects fly into your mouth and the soft parts of your throat and mouth. Remember that your face is basically an airbag to protect your skull - your brain doesn’t care what happens to your face because if anything damages the face or eyes, it will save the brain - so you might survive a shot to the face but does it really matter if you’re blind or maimed in the mouth, nose or ears. In war time, soldiers have been known to blow off the entire face, jaw, nose, eyes and all and still survive.

      The world is insane … we have OSHA standards that regulate what can or can’t be done in a work zone to keep people safe from harm and even death

      But when it comes to dealing with people in a public protest … all that safety goes out the window as police are allowed to fire small objects at unsafe speeds into people’s bodies and faces! Onto unsuspecting people with no training, knowledge or wherewithal to know that they should at least wear safety glasses.

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They KNOW how to make those rounds, “more lethal”, and use that info.

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Well, they didn’t drop a bunch of leaflets threatening residents to evacuate a chunk of L.A before firebombing hospitals and schools and doing target practice on ambulances yet…

      But that could be where it’s heading if we don’t put a stop to it yesterday.

    • RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      No, the Israeli playbook is using live ammunition and accusing the journalists of being members of Hamas

  • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Less than lethal is the accurate term. A rubber bullet or sandbag can definitely kill you

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      23 hours ago

      It’s not even less than lethal, because they’re still lethal. They’re “less lethal”, meaning they’re not designed to kill you when used correctly, but are still fully capable of doing so. “Less than lethal” implies that they’re not capable of killing, the same way any positive number is greater than 0; The positive number will never be equal to zero, because it is greater than zero.

      • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That is a good point. I have especially hated the term non lethal because of exactly what you said. Shame news outlets still use that term