HRC Article:

WASHINGTON — Last night, President Biden signed the FY25 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law, which includes a provision inserted by Speaker Mike Johnson blocking healthcare for the transgender children of military servicemembers. This provision, the first anti-LGBTQ+ federal law enacted since the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, will rip medically necessary care from the transgender children of thousands of military families – families who make incredible sacrifices in defense of the country each and every day. The last anti-LGBTQ+ federal law that explicitly targeted military servicemembers was Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, which went into effect in 1994.

Biden’s press release:

No service member should have to decide between their family’s health care access and their call to serve our Nation.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    Tell us you have no idea how the government works without telling us you have no idea how the government works.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Centrists pull out the “you don’t know how government works” gaslighting whenever someone calls them out and they have no actual rebuttal.

      Concession accepted.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s called facing reality and dealing with it, which isn’t nearly as much fun as mindlessly bashing oversimplified interpretations of click-bait headlines. Sure, it’s nice to play the game online where you pick one issue and ignore all the other issues no matter how important they are, but in the real world you have to do the best you can do. The consequences of vetoing the bill would be huge, while one of the articles posted elsewhere in the comments here[1] talks about the number of children who could be affected and that there are very few circumstances where the provision in the bill would have an impact (e.g. it only disallows treatments that would result in sterilization, which doesn’t include puberty blockers, etc.). But you’re obviously not interested in seriously considering the details and practicalities of the real world situation, just enjoying railing against Biden, so have fun with that.

        [1] edit to repost that link: https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2024/12/senate-passes-military-bill-with-provision-restricting-trans-healthcare/

        • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Being willing to sacrifice the rights and protections of ‘a few’ minorities so that our already inflated military doesn’t face delays in payment is exactly what Biden and the other democrats are being criticized for here.

          That you agree that those rights are unimportant isn’t exactly the impassioned defense you think it is

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Being willing to sacrifice the rights and protections of ‘a few’ minorities

            Democrats aren’t just willing to sacrifice trans people. They’re eager to.

              • vga@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                15 hours ago

                It’s reasonable to suspect that woke politics was one of the issues that made them do so badly. As the elections have been lost already, there’s no reason to maintain that pretense anymore.

                • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 minutes ago

                  That’s not reasonable at all. Harris did almost nothing to support minority rights and definitely didn’t do anything that would remotely qualify as performative. Centrists got exactly the campaign they wanted, you can’t run from the failure by throwing vulnerable people under the bus even harder.

                • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  14 hours ago

                  Tell you what - go ahead and try to put into words what you think ‘woke politics’ are without being bigoted or breaking comm rules and then I’ll be happy to share why I think you might be more comfortable hanging out at a nazi bar.

                  • vga@sopuli.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    4 hours ago

                    The problem is not the core goals of woke, which I understand to be inclusivity and social justice. The problem is perfomative outrage and a relentless search for microaggressions. This will alienate people who might in other circumstances be – if not allies – at least sympathetic to the causes.

          • leadore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Anyone who could vote and says they care about the rights of trans people better have voted for Harris or you have no standing on this issue.

            • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Lmao

              “Only people who were able to set aside their moral/ethical objections to genocide are qualified to speak on the topic of standing up for minority rights”

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          I already accepted your concession. You got what you wanted out of this bill. It’s a shame they had to fund the military too, huh?