HRC Article:

WASHINGTON — Last night, President Biden signed the FY25 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law, which includes a provision inserted by Speaker Mike Johnson blocking healthcare for the transgender children of military servicemembers. This provision, the first anti-LGBTQ+ federal law enacted since the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, will rip medically necessary care from the transgender children of thousands of military families – families who make incredible sacrifices in defense of the country each and every day. The last anti-LGBTQ+ federal law that explicitly targeted military servicemembers was Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, which went into effect in 1994.

Biden’s press release:

No service member should have to decide between their family’s health care access and their call to serve our Nation.

  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Being willing to sacrifice the rights and protections of ‘a few’ minorities so that our already inflated military doesn’t face delays in payment is exactly what Biden and the other democrats are being criticized for here.

    That you agree that those rights are unimportant isn’t exactly the impassioned defense you think it is

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Being willing to sacrifice the rights and protections of ‘a few’ minorities

      Democrats aren’t just willing to sacrifice trans people. They’re eager to.

        • vga@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          It’s reasonable to suspect that woke politics was one of the issues that made them do so badly. As the elections have been lost already, there’s no reason to maintain that pretense anymore.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 minutes ago

            That’s not reasonable at all. Harris did almost nothing to support minority rights and definitely didn’t do anything that would remotely qualify as performative. Centrists got exactly the campaign they wanted, you can’t run from the failure by throwing vulnerable people under the bus even harder.

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Tell you what - go ahead and try to put into words what you think ‘woke politics’ are without being bigoted or breaking comm rules and then I’ll be happy to share why I think you might be more comfortable hanging out at a nazi bar.

            • vga@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              The problem is not the core goals of woke, which I understand to be inclusivity and social justice. The problem is perfomative outrage and a relentless search for microaggressions. This will alienate people who might in other circumstances be – if not allies – at least sympathetic to the causes.

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Anyone who could vote and says they care about the rights of trans people better have voted for Harris or you have no standing on this issue.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Lmao

        “Only people who were able to set aside their moral/ethical objections to genocide are qualified to speak on the topic of standing up for minority rights”