• axh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    I am old enough and geek enough to be bothered by the use of the word “WiFi” instead of the Internet or just network.

    It’s only WiFi if you connect the wireless router at the end.

    Edit: just noticed mention of the “antenna at the roof” on the page, but I still don’t think it’s WiFi, “WiFi” is a name of the technology that allows wireless access by multiple devices. I think it’s rather radio communication between the router and the access point. They basically use radio waves instead of the cable, it was often used in rural areas in my country, where putting cables would be too expensive.

  • meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    I hope they are aware of https://freifunk.net/ and don’t start from scratch completely. They’ve been doing that kinda stuff for over a decade and have developed a modified OpenWRT version and maintain lists of compatible routers

  • ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    Getting ready to drop some raspberry pi OpenWRT WiFi 7 with WiFi HaLow around westchester to downtown. Let me know needed areas!

  • FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    Okay I read the explanation on their faq page but I’m still kinda confused on how this works. Don’t they need like satellites for internet access? What exactly is this in simple terms? Like it seems good, I just want to understand it

    • woodenleg_duck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 days ago

      You don’t need satellites, just some connection on a datacenter (like but internet in bulk, maybe they have some special deal and is free or very cheap). But this is the boring part, the fun part is that you can connect to the hubs (light blue dots in the map) with a router with an antenna or you can connect to another router (red dots). The network is like a living being that keeps expanding. Then to go out to the Internet, the packets are jumping as they can between neighbors (they have a way to know the path) until they reach the datacenter. It looks like you only have to pay for the initial equipment (plus some donations to maintain the network), but it will probably end up costing you some of your time maintaining the network, learning and helping other people in the network.

  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    This seems like a bad idea.

    What sort of protections are in place against nefarious actors that gain access to this network? Do they do anything to isolate each connected device from each other so that two devices on the network cannot connect to each other, such as making use of subnets? Are users connections throttled, and if so, to what degree? Are certain websites blocked to prevent potential malicious actors from intercepting sensitive data more easily, such as bank sites?

    I mean, the idea is a well intentioned one, but I can easily see this going very wrong very quickly.


    Me: Expresses concern about potential cybersecurity issues with a free publicly joinable network

    Lemmy: Furiously downvoting

    Honestly, I am not sure what I was expecting, but it was clearly too much.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        I don’t know, I find people do all sorts of stuff with their networks all the time that has me scratching my head trying to figure out why they set it that way when I am eventually called to fix it.

        • owsei@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          that makes sense

          but in this case, the bank, or whatever good site, would probably not even allow non-TLS connections

          and if the mesh necessitates TLS only on an exit node*. Then yeah, that’s a stupid and flawed network. And it also wouldn’t be transparent (in the sense of using just like a normal ISP)

          *I’m not sure how it connects to the rest of the internet, but assuming there are exit nodes that connect to other networks

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    19 days ago

    So no Internet when it rains?
    Sorry but this idea strikes me as it’s just not gonna work.

    Like I don’t even get it - NYC probably has many competing internet providers.

  • ryanvgates@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Does anyone know what other cities are building similar networks? Or how to get started doing it in your city?

    • nucleative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I was just thinking about ricochet while perusing the thread. Ricochet was new when I was starting in IT and I can still remember connecting a ricochet modem to a company laptop and then pulling up our novell netware file share over our vpn. It was jaw dropping to see it at the time. Amazing how far we’ve come since then.

  • thezeesystem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Way way long ago I remember when I lived in Portland that they tried this, it was a pilot program. Idk if it’s true or propaganda but it didn’t work out because it was slow down because of how much porn people where downloading, so they didn’t expand it and just stoped doing it.