BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 15 days agoWoman jailed after using shooting suspect's catchphrase as insurance company denied claim.www.rawstory.comexternal-linkmessage-square306fedilinkarrow-up11.08Karrow-down110
arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1external-linkWoman jailed after using shooting suspect's catchphrase as insurance company denied claim.www.rawstory.comBonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 15 days agomessage-square306fedilink
minus-squareɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down25·14 days agoWell, she actually said “Delay, Deny, Depose. You people are next,” That’s a pretty direct threat. The headline is misleading.
minus-squaremeliaesc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up41·edit-214 days agoThat’s worth 100k bond? Really? That’s more than voluntary manslaughter.
minus-squareQueen HawlSera@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30arrow-down1·14 days agoThey’re afraid of the common man now
minus-squareɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up2·14 days agoI don’t think so, no. Context is everything though. Before the assassination, just free speech, after, a threat of significant violence. Also, free Luigi!
minus-squaremeliaesc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-214 days agoI suppose so, but the thought process of just jailing any verbal dissent… how long can, a healthcare system of all things, run on fear?
minus-squareɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 days agoWell, it’s not just any dissent, it a threat of violence. If she didn’t say, “you’re next” I’d be agreeing with most of the people in this thread. Whoever posted this left that part out of the post. I wonder why.
minus-squareBronzebeard@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down2·14 days agoPointing out that what someone is doing puts a target on their back isn’t necessarily you threatening them.
minus-squareKbobabob@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down2·14 days agoWhere is the actual threat? You people are next, to get delayed, denied, or deposed.
Well, she actually said “Delay, Deny, Depose. You people are next,”
That’s a pretty direct threat. The headline is misleading.
That’s worth 100k bond? Really? That’s more than voluntary manslaughter.
They’re afraid of the common man now
They are supposed to be…
I know
I don’t think so, no. Context is everything though. Before the assassination, just free speech, after, a threat of significant violence.
Also, free Luigi!
I suppose so, but the thought process of just jailing any verbal dissent… how long can, a healthcare system of all things, run on fear?
Well, it’s not just any dissent, it a threat of violence. If she didn’t say, “you’re next” I’d be agreeing with most of the people in this thread.
Whoever posted this left that part out of the post. I wonder why.
Pointing out that what someone is doing puts a target on their back isn’t necessarily you threatening them.
Where is the actual threat? You people are next, to get delayed, denied, or deposed.