I read the article. That wasn’t a study. That was a survey where parents self-reported for their children. Hardly a study that has any scientific merit.
Tat’s part of science, too: Validate if the applied methods where actually worth anything. And aurvey of parents is not how you ro developmental science.
Reading the article apparently
I read the article. That wasn’t a study. That was a survey where parents self-reported for their children. Hardly a study that has any scientific merit.
Tat’s part of science, too: Validate if the applied methods where actually worth anything. And aurvey of parents is not how you ro developmental science.
https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/the-early-deception-survey-eds-its-psychometric-properties-in-chi/
I did say I’d wait for replication but it is absolutely research. Again you fail to understand the scientific method.
You fail to understand quality standards in science.