• mkhopper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    20 days ago

    I would have killed for 20Gb of space in 1999 on my personal PC. People ran with nowhere near that much space back then.

    I was also the administrator of an HP mainframe at that time, and we ran the whole business on about 5Gb, and paid big $$$ for it.

    • aard@kyu.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 days ago

      In '99 my 8GB disk died, and shortage of stock gave me a 12GB disk as warranty replacement.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      Did you mean 20GB? Cause 20Gb = 2.5Gb

      There is a difference between gigabytes and gigabits. 1 gigabyte (GB) = 8 gigabits (Gb)

      • Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Did you mean 20GB? Cause 20Gb = 2.5Gb

        The irony… Nobody talks about bits when it comes to storage, it’s basically only used for transfer speeds. So it should be pretty easy to infer by the context.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        Yes, and I think in the context, that is implied. I’m not a cable internet provider advertising “50 Mb” speeds and confusing people when they only get like 6MB.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      By late 99 you could catch 10GB drives on sale for $99, dude. If you were cool you bought two of them and ran them in a raid configuration so you had 20GB of space and your drives read/write was way faster. 20GB single drives themselves were still a few hundred, but that was it. I think my pc from like 1995 had 4GB drive in it to start with.

      Regardless of anything else, the posted numbers are obviously wack.