• 1st panel : spongebob in a stand caption reads “Single trans woman”
  • 2nd panel : a huge crowd gathered around spongebob
  • 3rd panel : spongebob adds a little paper on his table saying “I don’t use my penis”
  • 4th panel : the whole crowd left.
    • Zeke@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is why I’ve personally dropped it. I can’t do HRT, bottom surgery is out, political trouble isn’t worth it, and I’ve already been turned down just for using the pronouns he/him. To add, I am in fact a bottom and straight. That little bit of self love doesn’t really feel worth it in my case.

    • Chloë (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      At some point I think it’s just better not to tell people you’re trans , like If you have a neovagina and pass there is literally no visible difference.

      • howrar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        That sounds rather dangerous. There seems to be a not-insignificant number of people who would get irrationally angry at being tricked into having “gay sex” and thus being turned gay, and the only way they know to ungay themselves is through violence.

        • SamboT@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I dont understand how you guys think its okay to trick someone like that. How can you not respect a partner like that? How would it be irrational to be very upset by that?

          • howrar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            I say irrational to describe the degree of anger. Being upset about it? Sure. I don’t expect to understand it, but I can accept that it’s upsetting to some people.

            • SamboT@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Non-consensual sex is pretty egregious… I hope you understand that.

              • howrar@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                Of course. There’s the obvious requirement of consent before the act and continuous consent throughout the course of the act. Things become a lot less straightforward when it comes to revoking consent after the fact. I’m not convinced that violence is ever warranted in these scenarios.

                • SamboT@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Violence is never warranted but theres no confusion about consent. You cant get consent if you arent giving the terms to consent to. Consent means an understanding. This isnt iTunes terms and conditions.