It was RINO talking points. That’s different than the restructured right. RINOS are now the DEM party. Enjoy Liz Cheney, we were trying to get rid of her for a while. She’s your problem now.
You literally described yourself, Nazi. The right censored the fuck out of everyone not toei g their line, both online and in legacy media. Not Dems. The Right. Bezos. Musk. Zaslov. Not us, you.
Now fuck off Nazi punk.
Ummm, hey outside observer here. I saw a lot of dem leaning media during all this. Their was clearly ether little or ineffectual censorship in the left/right balance in media.
Case in point why would these results be so shocking if the media coverage was all against the Dems?
It’s NOT shocking because the media made it a point to not question or challenge trump while constantly questioning Biden and Harris. When trump became the oldest person to ever run for office they stopped talking about age.The media WANTS trump and always has. They don’t gaf about policy; they want clicks and eyeballs.
What are you talking about? The media constantly questions and accuses trump. There’s been numerous hoaxes about what hes said because they take every single thing out of context.
The recent Liz Cheney one is a great example. He talked about sending her to the front lines, and the media was talking about nothing but dissection and twisting his words to say he wanted to put her in front of a firing squad.
The legacy media is controlled by the Dems. That’s why so many quit watpo when Bezos stopped them from endorsing Kamala Harris. An unbiased news source shouldn’t be endorsing either candidate, and they all have been, for years now, and it’s been the Dem candidate every time.
Ah, the word that no longer has any meaning. Thanks to you, the universal reaction to accusations of Nazi are now an eye roll, not shock or horror. But keep it up. The more you accuse, the more people realize you’re actually the authoritarian hack.
I watched multiple speeches given by kamala and I watched the debate. This is the message I came away with and judging by the outcome of the election Im thinking that’s the message most people got. Intention is irrelevant perception is what matters and they failed
Except Harris did mention Trump’s age a few times (after the first debate). If you didn’t see it, you only looked at the disinformation channels, or it got drowned out by them.
Oh totally, attacking Trump’s age was never going to do anything, regardless of media hypocrisy; it was still righ to mention it. It’s also true that Biden was too old and people wouldn’t have voted for him.
That was never the democrat’s message.
What you are describing is the disinformation that you fell for.
Harris’s nomination acceptance speech was around 70% right wing positions. Undeniable.
It was RINO talking points. That’s different than the restructured right. RINOS are now the DEM party. Enjoy Liz Cheney, we were trying to get rid of her for a while. She’s your problem now.
Nazi punk fuck off
Not a Nazi, the Dem party adopted the fascistic playbook of control and censorship and it got them here. Who’s the Nazi again?
You literally described yourself, Nazi. The right censored the fuck out of everyone not toei g their line, both online and in legacy media. Not Dems. The Right. Bezos. Musk. Zaslov. Not us, you. Now fuck off Nazi punk.
Ummm, hey outside observer here. I saw a lot of dem leaning media during all this. Their was clearly ether little or ineffectual censorship in the left/right balance in media.
Case in point why would these results be so shocking if the media coverage was all against the Dems?
It’s NOT shocking because the media made it a point to not question or challenge trump while constantly questioning Biden and Harris. When trump became the oldest person to ever run for office they stopped talking about age.The media WANTS trump and always has. They don’t gaf about policy; they want clicks and eyeballs.
What are you talking about? The media constantly questions and accuses trump. There’s been numerous hoaxes about what hes said because they take every single thing out of context.
The recent Liz Cheney one is a great example. He talked about sending her to the front lines, and the media was talking about nothing but dissection and twisting his words to say he wanted to put her in front of a firing squad.
The legacy media is controlled by the Dems. That’s why so many quit watpo when Bezos stopped them from endorsing Kamala Harris. An unbiased news source shouldn’t be endorsing either candidate, and they all have been, for years now, and it’s been the Dem candidate every time.
Absolutely the wrong read. Fuck off, Nazi
Ah, the word that no longer has any meaning. Thanks to you, the universal reaction to accusations of Nazi are now an eye roll, not shock or horror. But keep it up. The more you accuse, the more people realize you’re actually the authoritarian hack.
I watched multiple speeches given by kamala and I watched the debate. This is the message I came away with and judging by the outcome of the election Im thinking that’s the message most people got. Intention is irrelevant perception is what matters and they failed
Except Harris did mention Trump’s age a few times (after the first debate). If you didn’t see it, you only looked at the disinformation channels, or it got drowned out by them.
Well no dems voted for Trump, and his voters don’t care about his age because it’s a cult of personality
Oh totally, attacking Trump’s age was never going to do anything, regardless of media hypocrisy; it was still righ to mention it. It’s also true that Biden was too old and people wouldn’t have voted for him.