Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-230 days agoAlright guys, who shut down their farmbot yesterday? Loss of 70k users (5%), graph might be misleading feddit.orgimagemessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1280arrow-down112file-text
arrow-up1268arrow-down1imageAlright guys, who shut down their farmbot yesterday? Loss of 70k users (5%), graph might be misleading feddit.orgBlaze (he/him)@feddit.org to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-230 days agomessage-square50fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareJumuta@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down6·29 days agono it’s not? you can see the axes and op even mentions that it’s a 5% drop the graph is clearly just fitted to the data
minus-squareBlaze (he/him)@feddit.orgOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·29 days agoI edited the title after their comment, it wasn’t that clear at the beginning
minus-squarelennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·28 days agoIn my classes on analytics, we were taught to prefer using normalised axes starting at 0 to more accurately put changes into perspective.
minus-squareThomasLadder_69@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·28 days ago the graph is clearly just fitted to the data That’s the problem. It’s heavily skewed when compared to the greater overall engagement statistics.
no it’s not?
you can see the axes and op even mentions that it’s a 5% drop
the graph is clearly just fitted to the data
I edited the title after their comment, it wasn’t that clear at the beginning
In my classes on analytics, we were taught to prefer using normalised axes starting at 0 to more accurately put changes into perspective.
That’s the problem. It’s heavily skewed when compared to the greater overall engagement statistics.