Vladimir Putin has said that a western move to let Kyiv use longer-range weapons against targets inside Russia would mean Nato would be “at war” with Moscow.

Putin spoke as US and UK top diplomats discussed easing rules on firing western weapons into Russia, which Kyiv has been pressing for, more than two and a half years into Moscow’s offensive.

“This would in a significant way change the very nature of the conflict,” Putin told a state television reporter.

“It would mean that Nato countries, the US, European countries, are at war with Russia,” he added. “If that’s the case, then taking into account the change of nature of the conflict, we will take the appropriate decisions based on the threats that we will face.”

MBFC
Archive

  • Rakonat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    7 days ago

    Well Putin, if you don’t want a war with NATO, you could always do the responsible thing and get the fuck out of Ukraine and stop launching illegal invasions of your neighbors.

      • Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Chapter VII of the UN Charter, I.E. internationally agreed upon law by UN signatories, which Russia as a sitting member of the security council should be obliged to obey, states use of force against another country, especially other members of the UN is prohibited except in cases of self-defense or by authorization of UN Council.

        So no, every invasion is not inherently illegal. That’s only explicitly true when you talk about Russia, because like every authoritarian power they only care about rules when they benefit them.

  • Cpo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    “Vladimir Putin says…”

    Aaand my brain switches off. Another red line.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    Another bluff. Also, we can just call it “special military operations”.

    Also, NATO includes Canada. Not just the US and European countries, like the article says.

    • bigFab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Russia have repeatedly admitted it has no chance of beating Nato. Hence the nuclear escalation is the only matter to discuss. A beated nation will press all the buttons.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 days ago

      They’ve been calling it for basically the last whole war.

      In fact, it’s been done pretty masterfully by not making one huge step, but small steps where no single one would force him to do something, but just over time each small step eventually gets to the point where he said he would have to do something…and hasn’t.

      • realitista@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        This is exactly the point. They are already at full throttle war with the West. The only further escalation they could make would be nukes, which would be their end, NATO can take out all of Russias nuclear capacity and win the war in Ukraine all with conventional weapons.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    Ok well I guess we’re all going to be affected. I propose that blender thing for putin when they get him out of the smokey hole.

  • A32topsL🌰@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    NATO should at least shoot down missiles and drones which enter their sovereign airspace. Save Ukrainian lives and structures. Would also be actual experience of shooting down such actual enemy hardware in their own airspace. No simulation, no controlled environment. Would also train their AI for real.

    • DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      maybe attack Ukrainian separatists as they are technically not Russian, and have flying transmitters over Ukraine and in the Black Sea with anti-Putin broadcasts.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Let Ukraine use slightly longer range weapons than anything they can prove has been fired by Russia. Every escalation by Russia is permission to use the next tier of missiles to wipe them out.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Anyone who has played the ‘Risk’ board game has an idea what the next moves should be.

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Risk didn’t properly account for Russia’s nukes being parted out for the last 50 years by black-market scalpers.

      They almost certainly lack sufficient unadulterated fuel, complete/functional nav systems, accurate arming systems or reliable detonation systems.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      So they should conquer the entirety of Asia in one turn, to get an extra 7 units per turn in order to afford their war with Europe?

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Putin is only 5’6".

    If he was a man, he would be a manlet.

    But he is an orc, 5’6" is pretty tall for an orc.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    “It would mean that Nato countries, the US, European countries, are at war with Russia,” he added. “If that’s the case, then taking into account the change of nature of the conflict, we will take the appropriate decisions based on the threats that we will face.”

    Assuming that the implication here isn’t that the appropriate decision would be “Russia’s gonna pull out of Ukraine”, and it’s more “Russia is gonna use nuclear weapons”, I expect that it can be added to this list:

    https://united24media.com/war-in-ukraine/a-timeline-of-russias-nuclear-threats-against-the-west-947

    A Timeline of Russia’s Nuclear Threats Against the West

    I believe that that would be entry #96.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’d also add that during the very first statement Putin made announcing the invasion, on February 24, 2022, he ended it with what I imagine was intended to be interpreted as a nuclear threat:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_conducting_a_special_military_operation

      “On conducting a special military operation” (Russian: О проведении специальной военной операции, romanized: O provedenii spetsialʹnoy voyennoy operatsii) was a televised broadcast by Russian president Vladimir Putin on 24 February 2022, announcing the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

      Warning against international intervention

      At the end of the address, Putin warned other countries against intervening in the conflict, saying:

      Whoever tries to interfere with us, and even more so to create threats for our country, for our people, should know that Russia’s response will be immediate and will lead you to such consequences that you have never experienced in your history. We are ready for any development of events. All necessary decisions in this regard have been made. I hope that I have been heard.[12][10][13]

      I don’t have a unified timeline of everyone’s activity, but we authorized military aid the next day, so I don’t think that the statement had a very extensive deterrent effect.

      https://www.defense.gov/Spotlights/Support-for-Ukraine/Timeline/

      Feb. 25, 2022

      U.S. Air Force Gen. Tod D. Wolters, commander, U.S. European Command and NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe announces the activation of the NATO Response Force.

      The Biden administration authorizes $350 million in military assistance from Defense Department inventories.